LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sims, Lionel Duke (2006)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
North West European late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age (EBA) monumental\ud alignments on the sun’s solstices and the moon’s standstills were first\ud systematically studied by Thom (Thom 1971). Later research, since labelled\ud ‘the Thom paradigm’ (Ruggles 1999), has rejected Thom’s eclipse prediction\ud and calendrical theories for these ancient alignments, yet retained his\ud definition of a lunar standstill as the ‘geocentric extreme declination’ of the\ud moon (Heggie 1981a, Heggie 1981b, Hoskin 2001, Morrison 1980, North\ud 1996, Ruggles 1999, Thom 1971). Thom suggested that prehistoric\ud ‘extrapolation devices’ calculated this midtransit\ud property of the moon from\ud observed horizon alignments, but subsequent research has found no\ud evidence for such devices. While a midtransit\ud definition of a lunar standstill is\ud an accurate specification of the phenomena, it is based upon the premises of\ud modern heliocentric astronomy and is unlikely to provide valid interpretations\ud of the monument builder’s use of horizon ‘astronomy’. This paper attempts to\ud demonstrate that the current theories used to explain the late Neolithic/EBA\ud function of lunar standstill alignments do not fit the horizon, and therefore\ud megalithic user, properties of lunar standstills. It is argued that a recent model\ud (Sims 2006b) is more consistent with the archaeology and ‘astronomy’ of\ud horizon aligned\ud monuments, and with any ethnographic elaboration of the\ud Thom paradigm.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 2010AD Inter- Southern Summer standstill Winter 5 Northern Summer 9 Winter 0
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article