Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Perera, Charith; Wakenshaw, Susan Y.L.; Baarslag, Tim; Haddadi, Hamed; Bandara, Arosha K.; Mortier, Richard; Crabtree, Andy; Ng, Irene C.L.; McAuley, Derek; Crowcroft, Jon (2016)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Computer Science - Computers and Society, Computer Science - Networking and Internet Architecture
The Internet of Things is expected to generate large amounts of heterogeneous data from diverse sources including physical sensors, user devices and social media platforms. Over the last few years, significant attention has been focused on personal data, particularly data generated by smart wearable and smart home devices. Making personal data available for access and trade is expected to become a part of the data-driven digital economy. In this position paper, we review the research challenges in building personal Databoxes that hold personal data and enable data access by other parties and potentially thus sharing of data with other parties. These Databoxes are expected to become a core part of future data marketplaces. Copyright © 2016 The Authors Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. C. Perera, C. H. Liu, S. Jayawardena, and M. Chen, “A survey on internet of things from industrial market perspective,” IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 1660-1679, 2014.
    • 2. C. Perera, R. Ranjan, L. Wang, S. U. Khan, and A. Y. Zomaya, “Big data privacy in the internet of things era,” IT Professional, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 32-39, May 2015.
    • 3. R. Mortier, T. Lodge, N. Bhandari, R. Houghton, A. Skatova, J. Goulding, C. Wagner, A. Madhavapeddy, and J. Crowcroft, “Demo: Dataware, a personal data architecture,” in The Fourth Digital Economy All-hands Meeting: Open Digital (DE), Salford, Manchester, UK, 2013.
    • 4. HAT Project, “Home hub-of-all-things (hat) as platform for multi-sided market powered by internetof-things: Opportunities for new economic & business model,” 2013-2015, http://hubofallthings. com/[Accessed on: 10-03-2016].
    • 5. RCUK Digital Economy HAT Project, “Engineering a market for personal data: The hub-of-all-things (hat) a briefing paper,” RCUK Digital Economy, Tech. Rep., 2014.
    • 6. A. Chaudhry, J. Crowcroft, H. Howard, A. Madhavapeddy, R. Mortier, H. Haddadi, and D. McAuley, “Personal data: Thinking inside the box,” in 5th decennial Aarhus conferences (Aarhus 2015 Critical Alternatives), 2015.
    • 7. H. Chen and Q. Jin, “Ubiquitous personal study: a framework for supporting information access and sharing,” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 539-548, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s00779-009-0221-z
    • 8. M. Mun, S. Hao, N. Mishra, K. Shilton, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, and R. Govindan, “Personal data vaults: A locus of control for personal data streams,” in Proceedings of the 6th International COnference, ser. CoNEXT '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 17:1-17:12. [Online]. Available: http: //doi.acm.org/10.1145/1921168.1921191
    • 9. C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos, “Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things,” Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81-93, Jan. 2014.
    • 10. Google Inc, “Introducing google opinion rewards,” 2016, http://www.google.com/insights/ consumersurveys/google opinion rewards [Accessed on: 28-02-2016].
    • 11. Datacoup, “Unlock the value of your personal data, introducing the world's first personal data marketplace,” 2016, https://datacoup.com/ [Accessed on:05-03-2016].
    • 12. J. Bates, Thingalytics - Smart Big Data Analytics for the Internet of Things. Software AG, 2015.
    • 13. B. Kamleitner, S. Dickert, M. Falahrastegar, and H. Haddadi, “Information bazaar: A contextual evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 5th ACM Workshop on HotPlanet, ser. HotPlanet '13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 57-62. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2491159.2491161
    • 14. J. P. Carrascal, C. Riederer, V. Erramilli, M. Cherubini, and R. de Oliveira, “Your browsing behavior for a big mac: Economics of personal information online,” in Proceedings of the 22Nd International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW '13. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2013, pp. 189-200. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2488388.2488406
    • 15. J. Bourgeois, J. van der Linden, G. Kortuem, B. A. Price, and C. Rimmer, “Conversations with my washing machine: An in-the-wild study of demand shifting with self-generated energy,” in Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, ser. UbiComp '14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 459-470. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2632048.2632106
    • 16. W. J. Najjar, Mohammad S.; Kettinger, “Data monetization: Lessons from a retailer's journey,” MIS Quarterly Executive, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 213, 2013.
    • 17. S. D. Prakash, “Big data led big monetization,” Vidwat, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 6-7, 2014.
    • 18. M. Bulger, G. Taylor, and R. Schroeder, “Data-driven business models: Challenges and opportunities of big data,” Oxford Internet Institute, Tech. Rep., 2014.
    • 19. C. Aperjis and B. A. Huberman, “A market for unbiased private data: Paying individuals according to their privacy attitudes,” Social Computing Group, HP Labs, Technical Report, 2012, http://arxiv.org/ pdf/1205.0030v1.pdf.
    • 20. M. L. Katz and C. Shapiro, “Network externalities, competition, and compatibility,” The American Economic Review, vol. 75, p. 424440, 1985.
    • 21. G. G. Parker and M. W. Van Alstyne, “Twosided network effects: A theory of information product design,” Manage. Sci., vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1494-1504, Oct. 2005. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
    • 22. A. Hagiu, “Multi-sided platforms: From microfoundations to design and expansion strategies,” Harvard Business School Strategy Unit,, Working Paper, 2007.
    • 23. K. J. Boudreau and A. Hagiu, “Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators,” in Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009, ch. 7. [Online]. Available: http: //EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:13257 7
    • 24. A. Hagiu and J. Wright, “Marketplace or reseller?” Manage. Sci., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 184-203, Jan. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2042
    • 25. A. Crabtree and R. Mortier, ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19- 23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, ch. Human Data Interaction: Historical Lessons from Social Studies and CSCW, pp. 3-21. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4 1
    • 26. C. Perera, C. H. Liu, and S. Jayawardena, “The emerging internet of things marketplace from an industrial perspective: A survey,” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 585-598, Dec 2015.
    • 27. A. Westin, Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum, 1967.
    • 28. L. Palen and P. Dourish, “Unpacking ”privacy” for a networked world,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI '03. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003, pp. 129-136. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642635
    • 29. H. Li, R. Sarathy, and H. Xu, “Understanding situational online information disclosure as a privacy calculus,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 62-71, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ abs/10.1080/08874417.2010.11645450
    • 30. B. A. Price, C. Mancini, Y. Rogers, A. K. Bandara, T. Coe, A. N. Joinson, J. A. Lay, and B. Nuseibeh, “Contravision: Presenting contrasting visions of future technology,” in CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ser. CHI EA '10. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2010, pp. 4759- 4764.
    • 31. T. Baarslag, A. T. Alan, R. C. Gomer, I. Liccardi, H. Marreiros, E. H. Gerding, and m.c. schraefel, “Negotiation as an interaction mechanism for deciding app permissions,” in ACM SIGCHI Conference Extended Abstract on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2016.
    • 32. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, Recommender Systems Handbook, 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2010.
    • 33. D. J. Solove, “A taxonomy of privacy,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 154, no. 3, p. 477, January 2006.
    • 34. C. Perera, R. Ranjan, and L. Wang, “End-to-end privacy for open big data markets,” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 44-53, July 2015.
    • 35. M. Yang, Y. Yu, A. K. Bandara, and B. Nuseibeh, “Adaptive sharing for online social networks: A trade-off between privacy risk and social benefit,” in 2014 IEEE 13th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, Sept 2014, pp. 45-52.
    • 36. R. Mortier, H. Haddadi, T. Henderson, D. McAuley, and J. Crowcroft, “Human-data interaction: The human face of the data-driven society,” in Social Science Research Network, 2014.
    • 37. D. Koll, J. Li, and X. Fu, “Soup: An online social network by the people, for the people,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Middleware Conference, ser. Middleware '14. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014, pp. 193-204. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2663165.2663324
    • 38. T. Karkkaainen and J. Ott, “Liberouter: Towards autonomous neighborhood networking,” in Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS), 2014 11th Annual Conference on, April 2014, pp. 162-169.
    • 39. A. Gawer and M. Cusumano, Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Boston, Mass. : Harvard Business School Press, 2002, ch. Introduction: Platform leadership and complementary innovation.
    • 40. M. Iansiti and R. Levien, The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
    • 41. C. Perera and A. Zaslavsky, “Improve the sustainability of internet of things through trading-based value creation,” in Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2014 IEEE World Forum on, March 2014, pp. 135-140.
    • 42. intelsecurity.com, “Intel securitys international internet of things smart home survey shows many respondents sharing personal data for money,” March 2016, https://newsroom.intel.com/newsreleases/intel-securitys-international-internet-ofthings-smart-home-survey/ [Accessed on: 11-05- 2016].
    • 43. altimetergroup.com, “Consumer perceptions of privacy in the internet of things: What brands can learn from a concerned citizenry,” Altimeter Group, Tech. Rep., June 2015.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | Privacy-by-Design: Buildin...
  • RCUK | From Human Data to Persona...
  • RCUK | Home Hub-of-all-Things (HA...
  • EC | UCN
  • EC | ASAP

Cite this article