LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Carson, H.J.; Collins, D.,; Richards, J. (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C800
When developing motor skills there are several outcomes available to an athlete depending on their skill status and needs. Whereas the skill acquisition and performance literature is abundant, an under-researched outcome relates to the refinement of already acquired and well-established skills. Contrary to current recommendations for athletes to employ an external focus of attention and a representative practice design, Carson and Collins’ (2011) [Refining and regaining skills in fixation/diversification stage performers: The Five-A Model. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 146–167. doi:10.1080/1750984x.2011.613682] Five-A Model requires an initial narrowed internal focus on the technical aspect needing refinement: the implication being that environments which limit external sources of information would be beneficial to achieving this task. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to (1) provide a literature-based explanation for why techniques counter to current recommendations may be (temporarily) appropriate within the skill refinement process and (2) provide empirical evidence for such efficacy. Kinematic data and self-perception reports are provided from high level golfers attempting to consciously initiate technical refinements while executing shots onto a driving range and into a close proximity net (i.e. with limited knowledge of results). It was hypothesised that greater control over intended refinements would occur when environmental stimuli were reduced in the most unrepresentative practice condition (i.e. hitting into a net). Results confirmed this, as evidenced by reduced intra-individual movement variability for all participants’ individual refinements, despite little or no difference in mental effort reported. This research offers coaches guidance when working with performers who may find conscious recall difficult during the skill refinement process.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bar-Eli, M. (1991). On the use of paradoxical interventions in counseling and coaching in sport. The Sport Psychologist, 5, 61-72.
    • Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., & Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 6-16. doi: 10.1037/1076-898x.8.1.6
    • Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Brown, S. J., Selbie, W. S., & Wallace, E. S. (2013). The X-Factor: An evaluation of common methods used to analyse major inter-segment kinematics during the golf swing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 31, 1156-1163. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.775474
    • Carson, H. J., & Collins, D. (2011). Refining and regaining skills in fixation/diversification stage performers: The Five-A Model. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 146-167. doi: 10.1080/1750984x.2011.613682
    • Carson, H. J., & Collins, D. (2015). The fourth dimension: A motoric perspective on the anxiety-performance relationship. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2015.1072231
    • Carson, H. J., Collins, D., & Jones, B. (2014). A case study of technical change and rehabilitation: Intervention design and interdisciplinary team interaction. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45, 57-78. doi: 10.7352/IJSP2014.45.057
    • Carson, H. J., Collins, D., & MacNamara, Á. (2013). Systems for technical refinement in experienced performers: The case from expert-level golf. International Journal of Golf Science, 2, 65-85.
    • Carson, H. J., Collins, D., & Richards, J. (2014a). Intra-individual movement variability during skill transitions: A useful marker? European Journal of Sport Science, 14, 327-336. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2013.814714
    • Carson, H. J., Collins, D., & Richards, J. (2014b). “To hit, or not to hit?” Examining the similarity between practice and real swings in golf. International Journal of Golf Science, 3, 103-118. doi: 10.1123/ijgs.2014-0003
    • Christina, R. W., & Corcos, D. M. (1988). Coaches guide to teaching sport skills. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    • Collins, D., & MacNamara, Á. (2012). The rocky road to the top: Why talent needs trauma. Sports Medicine, 42, 907-914. doi: 10.2165/11635140
    • Collins, D., Morriss, C., & Trower, J. (1999). Getting it back: A case study of skill recovery in an elite athlete. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 288-298.
    • Davids, K. (2012). Learning design for nonlinear dynamical movement systems. The Open Sports Science Journal, 5, 9-16. doi: 10.2174/1875399X01205010009
    • Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433. doi: 10.1038/415429a
    • Giblin, G., Farrow, D., Reid, M., Ball, K., & Abernethy, B. (2015). Exploring the kinaesthetic sensitivity of skilled performers for implementing movement instructions. Human Movement Science, 41, 76-91. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.02.006
    • Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., & Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 651-658. doi: 10.3758/BF03211385
    • Grinder, J., & Bandler, R. (1976). The structure of magic II. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
    • Guadagnoli, M. A., & Bertram, C. P. (2014). Optimizing practice for performance under pressure. International Journal of Golf Science, 3, 119-127. doi: 10.1123/ijgs.2014- 0021
    • Hanin, Y., Korjus, T., Jouste, P., & Baxter, P. (2002). Rapid technique correction using old way/new way: Two case studies with Olympic athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 16, 79-99.
    • Hanin, Y., Malvela, M., & Hanina, M. (2004). Rapid correction of start technique in an Olympic-level swimmer: A case study using old way/new way. Journal of Swimming Research, 16, 11-17.
    • Horn, R. R., Williams, A. M., & Scott, M. A. (2002). Learning from demonstrations: The role of visual search during observational learning from video and point-light models. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 253-269. doi: 10.1080/026404102317284808
    • Horn, R. R., Williams, A. M., Scott, M. A., & Hodges, N. J. (2005). Visual search and coordination changes in response to video and point-light demonstrations without KR. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 265-274.
    • Hristovski, R., Davids, K., Araújo, D., & Button, C. (2006). How boxers decide to punch a target: Emergent behaviour in nonlinear dynamical systems. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5, 60-73.
    • Lang, P. J. (1979). A bio-informational theory of emotional imagery. Psychophysiology, 16, 495−512. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01511.x
    • Langdown, B. L., Bridge, M. W., & Li, F.-X. (2013). Address position variability in golfers of differing skill level. International Journal of Golf Science, 2, 1-9.
    • MacPherson, A. C., Collins, D., & Morriss, C. (2008). Is what you think what you get? Optimizing mental focus for technical performance. The Sport Psychologist, 22, 288- 303.
    • MacPherson, A. C., Turner, A. P., & Collins, D. (2007). An investigation of natural cadence between cyclists and noncyclists. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 396-400. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2007.10599438
    • Martindale, A., & Collins, D. (2005). Professional judgment and decision making: The role of intention for impact. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 303-317.
    • Mesagno, C., & Mullane-Grant, T. (2010). A comparison of different pre-performance routines as possible choking interventions. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 343-360. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2010.491780
    • Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
    • Newell, K. M., Liu, Y.-T., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2001). Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychological Review, 108, 57-82. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.57
    • Oudejans, R. R. D., Koedijker, J. M., & Beek, P. J. (2007). An outside view on Wulf's external focus: Three recommendations. E-journal Bewegung und Training, 1, 41-42. www.ejournal-but.de
    • PGA. (2010). Study guide: Golf coaching 1. United Kingdom: The Professional Golfers' Association Limited.
    • Phelps, F. G., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Warnock, H. (2006). Helping children think: Gaze aversion and teaching. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 577-588. doi: 10.1348/026151005X49872
    • Roetenberg, D., Luinge, H., & Slycke, P. (2009). Xsens MVN: Full 6DOF human motion tracking using miniature inertial sensors. Technical report. Xsens Technologies B.V.
    • Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x
    • Scholz, J. P., & Schöner, G. (1999). The uncontrolled manifold concept: Identifying control variables for a functional task. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 289-306. doi: 10.1007/s002210050738
    • Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 21-53. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8
    • Toner, J., Nelson, L., Potrac, P., Gilbourne, D., & Marshall, P. (2012). From 'blame' to 'shame' in a coach-athlete relationship in golf: a tale of shared critical reflection and the re-storying of narrative experience. Sports Coaching Review, 1, 67-78. doi: 10.1080/21640629.2012.704193
    • Wertheim, A. H. (1981). Occipital alpha activity as a measure of retinal involvement in oculomotor control. Psychophysiology, 18, 432-439. doi: 10.1111/j.1469- 8986.1981.tb02476.x
    • Wulf, G. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 77-104. doi: 10.1080/1750984x.2012.723728
    • Zanone, P. G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1992). Evolution of behavioural attractors with learning: Nonequilibrium phase transitions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 403-421. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.403
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article