Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Canaway, Alastair; Al-Janabi, Hareth; Kinghorn, Philip; Bailey, Cara; Coast, Joanna (2017)
Publisher: Sage
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/pubmedpublicationtype/D016428, /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/pubmedpublicationtype/D013485, Capability Approach, Bereavement, Outcome Assessment, Journal Article, Economic Evaluation, Palliative Care, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, R1
Background: End-of-life care affects both the patient and those close to them. Typically, those close to the patient are not considered within economic evaluation, which may lead to the omission of important benefits resulting from end-of-life care.\ud \ud Aim: To develop an outcome measure suitable for use in economic evaluation that captures the benefits of end-of-life care to those close to the dying.\ud \ud Design: To develop the descriptive system for the outcome measure, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with the participants and constant comparative analysis methods were used to develop a descriptive system for the measure.\ud \ud Participants: Twenty-seven individuals bereaved within the last 2 years or with a close-person currently receiving end-of-life care were purposively recruited into the study. Participants were recruited through newsletters, adverts, snowball sampling and a local hospice.\ud \ud Results: Twenty-seven individuals were recruited. A measure of capability with six attributes, each with five levels, was developed based on themes arising from the analysis. Attributes comprise the following: good communication with services, privacy and space to be with the loved one, emotional support, practical support, being able to prepare and cope and being free from emotional distress related to the condition of the decedent.\ud \ud Conclusion: This measure is designed to capture the benefits of end-of-life care to close-persons for use in economic evaluation. Further research should value the measure and develop methods for incorporating outcomes for close-persons into economic evaluation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Coast J, Kinghorn P, Mitchell P. The Development of Capability Measures in Health Economics: Opportunities, Challenges and Progress. Patient, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25074355 (2014, accessed 4 December 2014).
    • Clark AE, Diener E, Georgellis Y, et al. Lags And Leads in Life Satisfaction: a Test of the Baseline Hypothesis. Econ J; 118: 222-243, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 0297.2008.02150.x (2008).
    • Ingleton C, Morgan J, Hughes P, et al. Carer satisfaction with end-of-life care in Powys, Wales: a cross-sectional survey. Heal Soc Care Community; 12: 43-52, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00467.x (2004, accessed 3 November 2014).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects


Cite this article