Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fillery-Travis, Annette; Tyrrell, Emma (2012)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Practitioner research has a specific role to play in the development of a profession. It can be argued that it is often at the start of the development of knowledge of an emerging practice. This research, produced by scholar practitioners, is highly ‘situated’ within the practice environment and at its best is not restricted to the evaluation within practice of existing models and theories but can through critical engagement with others lead to the development of new knowledge. To date, however, there is little literature concerned with the competencies required of practitioner researchers in general. Clearly this does restrict the evidence base for professional development in this area and the provision of resources to support this valuable activity. This study seeks to engage in an initial exploration of these competencies through the consideration of a small case study and the use of grounded theory for data collection and analysis. The case is a community of executive coaching practitioners brought together to undertake practitioner research as part of the Rainbow Convention, a conference held in Cape Town in May 2011. The community was unusual as all the self selected practitioners were trained in action learning and research methodologies and overseen by research supervisors but were not required to undertake a university course nor complete a research degree. This allowed the competencies required to carry out practitioner research to be considered in isolation from the competencies required for academic study. Through focus groups and interview the participants identified the competencies they considered most useful to the development of their research. The results are compared to the competencies required of professional researchers and the degree of agreement is of interest to those seeking to provide research training for senior practitioners either through research degrees or as part of their professional development.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, N., Herriot, P., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2001). The practitioner-researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 391-411.
    • Bartunek, J. M. (2007). Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need Not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1223- 1333.
    • Boud, D., & Costley, C. (2007). From project supervision to advising: new conceptions of the practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 119 - 130.
    • Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., Stavros, J. M., & Fry, R. (2008). Appreciative Inquiry Handbook: For Leaders of Change: Crown Custom Publishing, Inc.
    • Costley, C., & Armsby, P. (2006). Work‐based learning assessed as a field or a mode of study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(1), 21-33.
    • Costley, C., & Armsby, P. (2007). Research influences on a professional doctorate. Research in PostCompulsory Education, 12(3), 343-355.
    • Diedrich, R. C. (1996). An iterative approach to executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2), 61-66.
    • Fillery-Travis, A., & Passmore, J. (2011). A Critical Review of executive coaching research: a decade of profess and what's to come. Coaching : An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice Glaiser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discover of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
    • Gorby, C. B. (1937). Everyone gets a share of the profits. Factory Management & Maintenance,. Factory Management & Maintenance, 95, 82-83.
    • Graham, S., Wedman, J. F., & Kester, B. G. (1993). Manager Coaching Skills: Development and Application. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(1), 2-13.
    • Hillman, L. W., Schwandt, D. R., & Bartx, D. E. (1990). Enhancing staff memebers' performance through feedback and coaching. Journal of Management Development, 9(3), 20-27.
    • Kampa Kokesch, S., & Anderson, M. Z. (2001). Executive coaching: A comprehensive review of the literature. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(4), 205-228.
    • Kilburg, R. R. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2), 134-144.
    • Kleinberg, J. A. (2001). A scholar-practitioner model for executive coaching: Applying theory and application within the emergent field of executive coaching. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 61(12-A), 4853.
    • Lane, D., & Corrie, S. (2006). The Scientist Practitioner. New York: Routledge.
    • Lowman, R. L. (2001). Constructing a literature from case studies: Promise and limitations of the method. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research, 53(2), 119-123.
    • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2002). Action research: principles and practice: Routledge/Falmer.
    • Peterson, D. B. (1996). Executive coaching at work: The art of one-on-one change. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48(2), 78-86.
    • Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (1992). Coaching on LEadership. Leadership and ORganization DEvelopment Journal, 13(7), 15-18.
    • RainbowConvention. (2011). Retrieved 23rd July 2011, 2011, from www.gccrainbowconvention.org.za Ruona, W. E. A., & Gilley, J. W. (2009). Practitioners in Applied Professions: A Model Applied to Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(4), 438-453.
    • Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
    • Van der Ven, A. H. V. (2007). Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research: Oxford University Press.
    • Vitae. (2010). Researcher Development Framework.
    • Wasserman, I. C., & Kram, K. E. (2009). Enacting the Scholar- Practitioner Role. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45(1), 12-38.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article