LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fildes, Robert; Petropoulos, Fotios (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD
Armstrong, Green, and Graefe (this issue) propose the Golden Rule in forecasting: “be conservative”. According to the authors, the successful application of the Golden Rule comes through a checklist of 28 guidelines. Even if the authors of this commentary embrace the main ideas around the Golden Rule, which targets to address the “average” situation, they believe that this rule should not be applied automatically. There is no universal extrapolation method that can tackle every forecasting problem; nor are there simple rules that automatically apply without reference to the data. Similarly, it is demonstrated that for a specific causal regression model the recommended conservative rule leads to unnecessary inaccuracy. In this commentary the authors demonstrate, using the power of counter examples, two cases where the Golden Rule fails. Forecasting performance is context-dependent and, as such, forecasters (researchers and practitioners) should take into account the specific features of the situation faced.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allen, P. G., & Fildes, R. (2001). Econometric forecasting. In J. S. Armstrong (Eds.), Principles of Forecasting (pp. 303-362). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
    • Armstrong, J. S. (2006). Findings from evidence-based forecasting: Methods for reducing forecast error. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 583-598.
    • Asimakopoulos, S., & Dix, A. (2013). Forecasting support systems technologies-in-practice: A model of adoption and use for product forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 29, 322-336.
    • Assimakopoulos, V., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2000). The Theta model: a decomposition approach to forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(4), 521-530.
    • Athanasopoulos, G., Hyndman, R. J., Song, H., & Wu, D. C. (2011). The tourism forecasting competition. International Journal of Forecasting, 27 (3), 822- 844.
    • Baesens, B., Van Gestel T., Viaene, S., Stepanova, M., Suykens, J., and Vanthienen., J. (2003). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 627-635.
    • Dana, J., & Dawes, R. M. (2004). The superiority of simple alternatives to regression for social science predictions. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(3), 317- 331.
    • Davydenko, A., & Fildes R. 2013. Measuring forecasting accuracy: The case of judgmental adjustments to SKU-level demand forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting, 29(3), 510-522.
    • Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Alchemy in the behavioral sciences. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(3), 367-378.
    • Evanschitzky, H., & Armstrong, J. S. (2010). Replications of forecasting research. International Journal of Forecasting, 26(1), 4-8.
    • Fildes, R., & Goodwin, P. (2007). Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting. Interfaces, 37, 570-576.
    • Fildes, R., Hibon, M., Makridakis, S., & Meade, N. (1998). Generalising about univariate forecasting methods: further empirical evidence. International Journal of Forecasting, 14(3), 339-358.
    • Fildes, R., & Makridakis, S. (1995). The Impact of Empirical Accuracy Studies on TimeSeries Analysis and Forecasting. International Statistical Review, 63(3), 289-308.
    • Hyndman, R. J. & Khandakar, Y. (2008), Automatic Time Series Forecasting: The forecast Package for R, Journal of Statistical Software, 27(3), 1-22.
    • Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(4), 451-476.
    • Moon, M. A., Mentzer, J. T., & Smith, C. D. (2003). Conducting a sales forecasting audit. International Journal of Forecasting, 19(1), 5-25.
    • Newbold P., Granger C. W. J. (1974). Experience with forecasting univariate time series and the combintion of forecasts. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 137, 131-164.
    • Ord, J. K., & Fildes, R. (2013). Principles of Business Forecasting. Mason, OH: SouthWestern, Cengage Learning.
    • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002). Forecasting using principal components from a large number of predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 1167- 1179.
    • Syntetos, A. A. & Boylan, J. (2005). The accuracy of intermittent demand estimates. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(2), 303-314. ARIMA 0.897 0.937 0.998 0.951 0.918 0.928 N.B. The most accurate method is shown in bold, second most accurate in italics.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article