Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gibson, R. M.; Chennu, S.; Fernandez-Espejo, D.; Naci, L.; Owen, A. M.; Cruse, D. (2016)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Q

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: genetic structures
Objective\ud \ud Some patients diagnosed with disorders of consciousness retain sensory and cognitive abilities beyond those apparent from their overt behavior. Characterizing these covert abilities is crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, and medical ethics. This multimodal study investigates the relationship between electroencephalographic evidence for perceptual/cognitive preservation and both overt and covert markers of awareness.\ud Methods\ud \ud Fourteen patients with severe brain injuries were evaluated with an electroencephalographic vibrotactile attention task designed to identify a hierarchy of residual somatosensory and cognitive abilities: (1) somatosensory steady-state evoked responses, (2) bottom-up attention orienting (P3a event-related potential), and (3) top-down attention (P3b event-related potential). Each patient was also assessed with a clinical behavioral scale and 2 functional magnetic resonance imaging assessments of covert command following.\ud Results\ud \ud Six patients produced only sensory responses, with no evidence of cognitive event-related potentials. A further 8 patients demonstrated reliable bottom-up attention-orienting responses (P3a). No patient showed evidence of top-down attention (P3b). Only those patients who followed commands, whether overtly with behavior or covertly with functional neuroimaging, also demonstrated event-related potential evidence of attentional orienting.\ud Interpretation\ud \ud Somatosensory attention-orienting event-related potentials differentiated patients who could follow commands from those who could not. Crucially, this differentiation was irrespective of whether command following was evident through overt external behavior, or through covert functional neuroimaging methods. Bedside electroencephalographic methods may corroborate more expensive and challenging methods such as functional neuroimaging, and thereby assist in the accurate diagnosis of awareness.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Multi(Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (first part). N. Engl. J. Med. 1994;330(21):1499-1508.
    • Multi(Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (second part). N. Engl. J. Med. 1994;330(22):1572-1579.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article