Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Nunn, A (2008)
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper considers the latest developments in an ongoing attempt to restructure the English working class. It divides this project into two distinct phases. The first is associated with destructive policies to undermine the political, social and institutional structures of the working class embedded in the post- War social democratic and compromise. The paper then goes on to show how New Labour initially sought to rebuild the working class in the image of global competitiveness, at the outset of the second phase to restructure the English working class. The paper argues that the present moment in policy development represents a watershed in this second-phase. The aim now is to contain and overcome some of the contradictions thrown up by New Labour’s early policies and to raise the raise the workforce in terms of its position in the Global Division of Labour. To do so, there is a need to move up those sections of the working class currently working in, and competing for, low-value and low paid ‘entry-level’ work, in order to create space for largely inactive elements of the latent workforce to move into. The project is pre-figured by a wholesale acceptance of the politics of global competitiveness. The discussion is undertaken via an analysis of three key sets of policy documents associated with the Harker Review of Child Poverty, the Leitch Review of Skills and the Freud Review of Welfare.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. 2004. 'Unemployment in Britain: What are the Real Numbers?' The Social Europe We Need, 4 (3), 105-135.
    • Beatty, C. and Fothergill, S. 2002. “Hidden Unemployment among men: A case study”. Regional Studies, 34 (7), pp. 617-630.
    • Beatty, C., Fothergill, S., Gore, T. and Green, A. (2002) The Real Level of Unemployment 2002. Sheffield, CRESR, Sheffield Hallam University.
    • Breen, R. (ed.). 2004. Social Mobility in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Breen, R. 2004a. “Social Mobility in Europe”, paper on personal website at http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/sociology/Group/BreenHomepage.htm.
    • Brown, G. 2005, 'Politics as a Moral Duty', Speech to the annual Labour Party Conference, 26 September, Brighton, http://www.labour.org.uk/ac05speeches.
    • Brown, G. 2004. “Pre-Budget Report Statement to the House of Commons Delivered by Chancellor Gordon Brown”, (2 December), HM Treasury, available at: http://www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/pre_budget_report/prebud_pbr04/prebud_pbr04_speech.cf m.
    • Cabinet Office 2007. Building on Progress: The Role of the State, London: Cabinet Office.
    • Department for Work and Pensions. 2006a. Press Release: “Murphy welcomes new focus on tackling child poverty”, 26 June: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/mediacentre/pressreleases/2006/jun/cphs027- 260606.asp.
    • Heath, A. 1981. Social Mobility, Glasgow: Fontana.
    • Heath A. and Payne, C. 1999. “Twentieth Century Trends in Social Mobility in Britain”, Centre for Research into Elections and Social Trends, Working Paper 70, www.crest.ox.ac.uk.
    • Hills, J. 2007. Ends and Means, the future roles of social housing in England, London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (34).
    • HM Treasury. 2004. Child Poverty Review, London: HM Treasury.
    • HM Treasury. 2004a. Opportunity for all: the strength to take long-term decisions for Britain, CM6408, Norwich: HMSO.
    • HM Treasury. 2004b. Skills in the Global Economy, Norwich: HMSO.
    • HM Treasury 2000. Spending Review 2000 Public Service Agreements White Paper, London: TSO.
    • Hutton, J. 2006. “Welfare Reform: 10 years on, 10 years ahead”, speech, 18 December: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/aboutus/2006/18-12-06.asp.
    • Hutton, J. 2006a. “Ending Child Poverty and Transforming Life Chances”, Speech to the Fabian Society, 10 May: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/aboutus/2006/10- 05-06.asp.
    • Jessop, B. 2007. “New Labour or the Normalisation of Neoliberalism?”, British Politics, 2:2.
    • Knott, D. Muers, S. and Aldridge, S. 2007. Achieving Culture Change: a policy framework, London: Cabinet Office.
    • Learning and Skills Council (2007), National Employer Skills Survey Headline findings November 2007, Coventry: LSC.
    • Overbeek, H. 1990. Global Capitalism and National Decline: The Thatcher Decade in Perspective, London; Unwin Hyman.
    • Palmer, G. MacInnes, T.and Kenway, P. (2007), Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion 2007, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Palmer, G. MacInnes, T.Kenway, P. 2006.Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Policy Research Institute. 2006. Phase 2 evaluation of Multiple Provider Employment Zones: Qualitative study, DWP Research Report 399. London: Department for Work and Pensions,
    • Rose, D. and O'Reilly, K. 1998. The ESRC review of government social classifications, London: Office for National Statistics.
    • Smith, N. and Middleton, S. 2007. A review of poverty dynamics research in the UK, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Talbot, C. 2007. Understanding Customers: What Influences their Behaviour?, London: Department for Work and Pensions.
    • 1. The Politics of Global Competitiveness
    • 2. UN Imperialism: unleashing entrepreneurship in the developing world
    • 3. Forget the Transnational State
    • 4. Class Politics, Competitiveness, and the Developmental State
    • 5. Competitiveness and Convergence: the Open Method of Coordination in Latin America
    • 6. Competitiveness, Social Justice, and the Third Way
    • 8. Competitiveness and the New Labour Project
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article