Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ekvall, T.; Elander, M.; Umpfenbach, K.; Hirschnitz-Garbers, M.; Hudson, C.; Wunder, S.; Nesbit, M.; Keenleyside, C.; Mazza, L.; Russi, D.; Tucker, G.; Underwood, E.; Withana, S.; Bicket, M.; Vanner, R.; Kong, M.A.; Tan, A.; Bigano, A.; Eboli, F.; Gaska, J.; Sniegocki, A. (2016)
Publisher: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: UOWABE
This report documents the development of the initial dynamic policy mixes that were developed for assessment in the DYNAMIX project. The policy mixes were designed within three different policy areas: overarching policy, land-use and food, and metals and other materials. The policy areas were selected to address absolute decoupling in general and, specifically, the DYNAMIX targets related to the use of virgin metals, the use of arable land and freshwater, the input of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus, and emissions of greenhouse gases. Each policy mix was developed within a separate author team, using a common methodological framework that utilize previous findings in the project. Specific drivers and barriers for resource use and resource efficiency are discussed in each policy area. Specific policy objectives and targets are also discussed before the actual policy mix is presented. Each policy mix includes a set of key instruments, which can be embedded in a wider set of supporting and complementary policy instruments. All key instruments are described in the report through responses to a set of predefined questions. The overarching mix includes a broad variety of key instruments. The land-use policy mix emphasizes five instruments to improve food production through, for example, revisions of already existing policy documents. It also includes three instruments to influence the food consumption and food waste. The policy mix on metals and other materials primarily aims at reducing the use of virgin metals through increased recycling, increased material efficiency and environmentally justified material substitution. To avoid simply shifting of burdens, it includes several instruments of an overarching character.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Delforge Pierre and Horowitz Noah. 2013. Energy Consumption of New Generation Game Consoles in the EU - Key Findings, URL: http://www.coolproducts.eu/resources/documents/2014-ALL/NRDC-PS4-XboxOne-EnergyKey-Findings---EU.pdf [31/07/2014]
    • Deloitte. 2013. Responsible tax: Sustainable tax strategy, URL: https://www.deloitte.com/assets/DcomUnitedKingdom/Local%20Assets/Documents/Services/Tax/uk-tax-responsible-tax-v2.pdf
    • Demailly, Damien, Lucas Chancel, Henri Waiman, and Céline Guivarch. 2013. “A PostGrowth Society for the 21st Century - Does Prosperity Have to Wait for the Return of Economic Growth?” Studies N°08/2013. Paris: IDDRI.
    • Devetter, F.-X., Rousseau, S. 2011. Working hours and sustainable development. Review of Social Economy 69, 333-355.
    • Dise, N.B. 2011. Nitrogen as a threat to European terrestrial diversity, in M A Sutton, C M Howard, J W Erisman, G Billen, A Bleeker, P Grennfelt, H van Grinsven, & B Grizzetti (eds) The European Nitrogen Assessment, Chapter 20. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Druckman, A., Buck, I., Hayward, B. and Jackson, T. 2012. Time, gender and carbon: A study of the carbon implications of British adults' use of time. Ecological Economics 84: 153-163.
    • EEA. 2009. Water Resources across Europe. Confronting Water Scarcity and Drought. EEA Report No 2/2009, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    • EEA. 2010a. The European Environment State and Outlook 2010: Land Use. State of the Environment Report, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    • EEA. 2010b. EU 2010 Biodiversity Baseline. EEA Technical Report No 12/2010, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    • EEA. 2011a. The European environment - state and outlook 2010: assessment of global megatrends. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    • EEA. 2011b. Average age of the vehicle fleet (TERM 033). http://www.eea.europa.eu/dataand-maps/indicators/average-age-of-the-vehiclefleet/ds_resolveuid/0a8fd4edfd22606ef529fd12ee3d3fa9.
    • EEA. 2012a. The European State and Outlook 2010, Consumption and the Environment - 2012 Update. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/consumption-and-the-environment2012.
    • EEA. 2012b. European waters - assessment of status and pressures. EEA Report No.8/2012, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
    • Ekvall, Tomas, Fredrik Persson, and Anna Fråne. 2014. Material Pinch Analysis: A pilot study on global steel flows. Metall. Res. Technol. 111: 359-367.
    • Ekvall T, Eboli F, Hudson C, Sniegocki A. 2015. Dynamic policy mix for efficient use of metals and other material resources. World Resources Forum. Davos, Switzerland. October 2015.
    • Ekvall T, Hirschnitz-Garbers M, Eboli F, Sniegocki A. 2016a. A systemic approach to the development of a policy mix for material resource efficiency. Sustainability (submitted).
    • Ekvall T, Martin M, Palm D, Danielsson L, Fråna A, Laurenti R, Oliveira F. 2016b. Physical and environmental assessment. DYNAMIX Deliverable D6.1. Gothenburg, Sweden: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institutet.
    • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 2012. Towards the Circular Economy. Volume 1.
    • Ellen Macarthur Foundation. 2013. Towards the Circular Economy: Opportunities for the consumer goods sector Volume 2.
    • EREP. 2014. Manifesto and Policy Recommendations. European Resource Efficiency Platform. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/documents/erep_manifesto_and_polic y_recommendations_31-03-2014.pdf [26/06/2014]
    • Espinosa, Denise Crocce Romano and Mansur, Herman Sander. 2012. 'Recycling Batteries', in Goodship, Vannessa and Stevels Ab (eds), 'Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Handbook', Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
    • ETC/SCP. 2012. Overview of the use of landfill taxes in Europe, ETC/SCP working paper 1/2012, URL: http://scp.eionet.europa.eu/publications/WP2012_1/wp/WP2012_1
    • EU. 2009. Directive 2009/125/EC establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (recast). Official Journal of the European Union L 285/10, 31.10.2009, Url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0125&from=en [08/07/2014].
    • FAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2010. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
    • FAO. 2011. Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention. Study conducted for the International Congress SAVE FOOD! at Interpack2011 Düsseldorf, Germany, 2011. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
    • FAO. 2013. Food wastage footprint: impacts on natural resources - summary report
    • FAO. 2014. FAO Statistical Yearbook, 2014: Europe and Central Asia Food and Agriculture
    • Fedrigo-Fazio, Doreen, Leonardo Mazza, Patrick ten Brink, and Emma Watkins. 2014. Comparative analysis of policy mixes addressing natural resources. Deliverable 3.2 of DYNAMIX. London/Brussels: Institute for European Environmental Policy. http://dynamixproject.eu/sites/default/files/D.3.2.%20Comparative_Assessment_final_public.pdf.
    • Fischer-Kowalski M, Swilling M, von Weizsäcker EU, Ren Y, Sadovy Y, Crane W, Krausmann F, et al. 2011. Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth - A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme.
    • Gerbens-Leenes P.W. and S. Nonhebel. 2002. Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food. Ecological Economics 42: 185-199.
    • GHK. 2006. A study to examine the benefits of the End of Life Vehicles Directive and the costs and benefits of a revision of the 2015 targets for recycling, re-use and recovery under the ELV Directive, Final Report to DG Environment, URL: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/study/final_report.pdf
    • Global View Sustainability Services. 2011. Review of EuP Preparatory Study Evidence: Does it support development of non-energy related implementing measures? Report to the
    • Hallström, E., S. Ahlgren, and P. Börjesson. 2011. Challenges and opportunities for future production of food, feed and biofuel. A land use perspective. Report no 74. Lund: Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, Lund University.
    • Hart, K., B. Allen, M. Lindner, C. Keenleyside, P.J. Burgess, J. Eggers, and A. Buckwell. 2013. Land as an environmental resource. Report prepared for DG Environment, Contract No ENV.B.1/ETU/2011/0029. London: Institute for European Environmental Policy.
    • Hayden, A. and J.M. Shandra. 2009. Hours of work and the ecological footprint of nations: an exploratory analysis. Local Environment 14: 575-600.
    • Herrero, M., P. Havlik, H. Valin, A. Notenbaert, M.C. Rufino, P.K. Thornton, M. Blummel, F. Weiss, D. Grace, and M. Obersteiner. 2013. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 110(52): 20888-20893.
    • Herrero, M., P.K. Thornton, P. Gerber, and R.S. Reid. 2009. Livestock, livelihoods and the environment: understanding the trade-offs. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1(2): 111-120.
    • Hewitt, J. 2011. Flows of biomass to and from the EU. An analysis of data and trends. FERN, Brussels.
    • Hislop, H. and J. Hill. 2011. Reinventing the Wheel: A Circular Economy for Resource Security (Green Alliance).
    • Hogg, Dominic, Mikael Skou Andersen, Tim Elliot, et al. 2014. Study on Environmental Fiscal Reform Potential in 12 EU Member States. Gestion des déchets: bilans 2009-2012 de la TGAP et des soutiens de l'ADEME. http://www.developpementdurable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_TGAP.pdf.
    • IEA. 2015. “World - Final consumption (2012)”. International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/Sankey/index.html#?c=World&s=Final consumption. Accessed February 13th 2015.
    • Kessler, J.J., T. Rood, T. Tekelenburg, and M. Bakkenes. 2007. Biodiversity and socioeconomic impacts of selected agro-commodity production systems. The Journal of Environment and Development 16(2): pp131-160.
    • Knight, K.W., E.A. Rosa, and J.B. Shor. 2013. Could working less reduces pressures on the environment? A cross-national panel analysis of OECD countries, 1970-2007, Global Environmental Change 23: 691-700.
    • KPMG. 2012. Expect the Unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. KPMG International Cooperative.
    • Kubiszewski,I., R. Costanza, C. Franco, P. Lawn, J. Talberth, T. Jackson, and C. Aylmer. 2013. Beyond GDP: measuring and achieving genuine global progress. Ecol. Econ. 93: 57- 68.
    • Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    • Kumpula, J., A. Colpaert, A. Tanskanen, M. Anttonen, H. Törmänen, and J. Siitari. 2006. Porolaidunten inventoinnin kehittäminen. Keski-Lapin paliskuntien laiduninventointi vuosina 2005-2006. KALA - JA RIISTARAPORTTEJA nro 397, Riistan-ja kalantutkimus, Kaamanen, Helsinki.
    • Lindberg J. 2014. Monetarization - A Life Cycle Assessment weighting methodology: Monetize environmental impacts of paint with and without modified colloidal silica for AkzoNobel. Report No. 2014:10. Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/200762/200762.pdf
    • Linn, S. 2010. Commercialism in Children's Lives, in: Assadourian, E. (ed.): Transforming Cultures. From consumerism to sustainability, Worldwatch State of the World Report, p. 62-68.
    • Ljunggren Söderman, Maria, David Palm and Tomas Rydberg. 2011. Förebygga avfall med kretsloppsparker. Analys av miljöpåverkan. (Reducing waste through recycling parks: analysis of the environmental impact.) Report B1958. Gothenburg, Sweden: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute. In Swedish. Available at http://www.ivl.se/english/startpage/press/news/news/reuseoffersmajorenvironmentalbenefit s.5.7df4c4e812d2da6a416800084686.html
    • Lucha, C. and Roberts, E. (2015): Legal assessment of DYNAMIX policy mixes. DYNAMIX deliverable 5.4.1. Berlin, Germany: Ecologic Institute
    • Lugschitz, B., M. Bruckner, and S. Giljum. 2011 Europe's global land demand. A study on the actual land embodied in European imports and exports of agricultural and forestry products. Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI), Vienna, Austria.
    • Mani, Shyamala. 2012. 'WEEE management in the USA and India research and education for a responsible approach to managing WEEE' in Goodship, Vannessa and Stevels Ab (eds), 'Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Handbook', Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
    • Mann, M.L., R.K. Kaufmann, D. Bauer, S. Gopal, M. del Carmen Vera-Diaz, D. Nepstad, F. Merry, J. Kallay, and G.S. Amacher. 2010. The economics of cropland conversion in Amazonia: The importance of agricultural rent. Ecological Economics 69: 1503-1509.
    • Marques R. C. et al. 2013. Economic viability of packaging waste recycling systems: A comparison between Belgium and Portugal.
    • Martínez-Alier, J., U. Pascual, F.-D. Vivien, and E. Zaccai. 2010. “Sustainable de-Growth: Mapping the Context, Criticisms and Future Prospects of an Emergent Paradigm.” Ecological Economics 69(9): 1741-1747.
    • Mazza L., D. Fedrigo-Fazio, S. Withana, and A. Faria Lopes. 2013. Evaluating existing policy mixes to identify solutions for EU resource efficiency - Summary report of 15 real world policy mix evaluations. URL: http://dynamixproject.eu/sites/default/files/DYNAMIX_WP3_Case-Study-Summary.pdf
    • McKinsey Global Institute. 2011. Resource revolution: meeting the world's energy, materials, food and water needs.
    • Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. 1972. The Limits to Growth. New York: Universe Books. http://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Limits-to-Growth-digital-scanversion.pdf
    • Meyer, Bernd. 2011. Macroeconomic modelling of sustainable development and the links between the economy and the environment. GWS for the European Commission, DG Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/studies_modelling/pdf/report_macroeconomic.pdf.
    • Miegel, Meinhard. 2010. Exit: Wohlstand Ohne Wachstum. [Exit: Prosperity without growth] Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.
    • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC : World Resources Institute.
    • Ministère de l'économie, des finances et de l'industrie, France, 2014. URL: http://vosdroits.service-public.fr/professionnels-entreprises/F23497.xhtml
    • Mission Ministerielle. 2013. 'Projects annuels de performances. Annex au project de loi de finances pour 2013. Aides à l'acquisition de vehicules propres'. http://www.performancepublique.budget.gouv.fr/farandole/2013/pap/pdf/PAP2013_CS_CA S_Aide_Acquisition_Vehicules_propres.pdf
    • Moore D, Galli A, Cranston GR, Reed A. 2012. Projecting future human demand on the Earth's regenerative capacity. Ecol. Indic.16:3-10.
    • Narayanan, Badri G. and Terrie L. Walmsley, Editors. 2008. Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 7 Data Base. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.
    • Nässén, J., Larsson, J. 2010. Would shorter work time reduce greenhouse gas emissions? An analysis of time use and consumption in Swedish households. Working Paper, Version March 26, 2010. Gothenburg, Chalmers University of Technology.
    • National Energy Policy Institute. 2013. The Economics of Fuel Economy Standards versus Feebates, URL: http://www.yale.edu/gillingham/Gillingham_FeebatesCAFE.pdf
    • NDA. 2012. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA). Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein. EFSA Journal 2012.
    • NEF. 2010. “The Great Transition”. London: new economics foundation.
    • NEF. 2012. About Time: Developing the Case for a Shorter Working Week. New Economics Foundation, London. Suomen ympäristö 8/2008. Helsinki: Suomen ympäristökeskus [The Finnish Environment Institute].
    • Raza, A. 2011. Deciphering Los Angeles's Billboard Laws, in: Los Angeles Lawyer January 2011, p. 9-11, available on the internet at: http://www.lacba.org/Files/LAL/Vol33No10/2772.pdf [Accessed 7 August 2014].
    • Rey Benayas, J.M. and J.M. Bullock. 2012. Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services on agricultural land. Ecosystems 15(6): 883-899.
    • Rockström, Johan, Will Steffen, Kevin Noone, Åsa Persson, F. Stuart Chapin, Eric Lambin, Timothy M. Lenton, et al. 2009. “Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Ecology and Society 14(2): 32.
    • Rohn, Holger., Lettenmeier, Michael and Pastewski, Nico. 2011. 'Identification of Technologies, Products and Strategies with High Resource Efficiency Potential: Results of a Cooperative Selection Process', in Bleischwitz, Raimund., Welfens, Paul and Zhang, Zhongxiang (eds.), International Economics of Resource Efficiency: Eco-Innovation Policies for a Green Economy, Physica-Verlag.
    • Rosnick, D., Weisbrot, M. 2006. "Are Shorter Work Hours Good for the Environment? A Comparison of U.S. and European Energy Consumption," CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2006-32, Washington D.C.: Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
    • Rudel TK, et al. 2009. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 20675-20680.
    • Russell, D. 2014. Corporate sustainability: accounting standards vs tax by design", Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 10: 3.
    • Schmidt, JH. 2010. 25-year forecasts of the cumulated physical stocks, waste generation, and environmental impacts for each scenario for EU-27 and for the case study countries. Overall mapping of physical flows and stocks of resources to forecast waste quantities in Europe and identify life-cycle environmental stakes of waste prevention and recycling. FORWAST, FP6 research project.
    • Schmidt, M., M. Porcar, V. Schachter, A. Danchin, and I. Mahmutoglu. 2012. Biofuels, in M Schmidt (ed) Synthetic Biology, pp7-66. vol. doi: 10.1002/9783527659296.ch1 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
    • Schneider, F., G. Kallis, and J. Martinez-Alier. 2010. “Crisis or Opportunity? Economic Degrowth for Social Equity and Ecological Sustainability. Introduction to This Special Issue.” Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (6): 511-18.
    • Schor, J. 1998. “The overspent American”. New York: Basic Book.
    • Schor, J. 2010. Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth. Penguin Press, New York.
    • Schoumans, O.F., W.J. Chardon, M. Bechmann, C. Gascuel-Odoux, G. Hofman, B. Kronvang, M.I. Litaor, A. Lo Porto, P. Newell-Price, and G. Rubaek. 2011. Mitigation options for reducing nutrient emissions from agriculture. A study amongst European Member States of Cost Action 869. Alterra report 2141, Alterra Wageningen UR, Wageningen.
    • Seely, A. 2013. VAT: European law on VAT rates; House of Commons library, URL: www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/sn02683.pdf
    • Tellus Institute. 2014. From Waste to Jobs : What Achieving 75 Percent Recycling Means for California, Report for Natural Resources Defense Council, Boston 2014
    • Temple, H.J. and N.A. Cox. 2009a. European Red List of Amphibians. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    • Temple, H.J. and N.A. Cox. 2009b. European Red List of Reptiles. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    • TNO. 2013. Opportunities for a Circular Economy in the Netherlands, The Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research.
    • Trucost. 2013. Natural Capital at Risk: The top 100 externalities of business.Trucost PLC.
    • Trumper et. al. 2009. "The Natural Fix? The Role of Ecosystems in Climate Mitigation", A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC,.
    • Tscharntke, T., Y. Clough, T.C. Wanger, L.E. Jackson, I. Motzke, I. Perfecto, J. Vandermeer, and A. Whitbread. 2012. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biological Conservation 151(1) : 53-59.
    • Tucker, G.M. and M. Evans. 1997. Habitats for Birds in Europe: a Conservation Strategy for the Wider Environment. Cambridge: BirdLife International.
    • Tucker, G.M., E. Underwood, A. Farmer, R. Scalera, I.A. Dickie, A.J. McConville, and W. van Vliet. 2013. Estimation of the financing needs to implement Target 2 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy. Report to the European Commission. Institute for European Environmental Policy
    • Tucker, G.M., B. Allen, M. Conway, I. Dickie, K. Hart, M. Rayment, and C.J.E. Schulp. 2014. Policy Options for an EU No Net Loss Initiative. Report to the European Commission (with Annexes), Institute for European Environmental Policy.
    • Turbé, Anne, Arianna De Toni, Patricia Benito, Patrick Lavelle, Perrine Lavelle, Nuria Ruiz, Wim H. Van der Putten, Eric Labouze, and Shailendra Mudgal. 2010. Soil biodiversity: functions, threats and tools for policy makers. [Contract 07.0307/2008/517444/ETU/B1], Report for European Commission (DG Environment). Bio Intelligence Service, IRD, and NIOO.
    • UEPG. 2013. Annual Review 2012/2013. Union Européenne des Producteurs de Granulats, Brussels
    • Umpfenbach, K. 2014. Influences on consumer behaviour. Policy implications beyond nudging, Berlin: Ecologic Institute.
    • Umpfenbach, K. 2013. Common Approach for DYNAMIX. Deliverable 1.2 of DYNAMIX. Berlin: Ecologic Institute. http://dynamixproject.eu/sites/default/files/D.1.2_Common_Approach_public.pdf.
    • UNECE and FAO 2011: State of Europe's Forests 2011. Status and Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe.
    • Underwood, E., D. Baldock, H. Aiking, A. Buckwell, E. Dooley, A. Frelih-Larsen, S. Naumann, C. O'Connor, J. Poláková, and G.M. Tucker. 2013a. Options for sustainable food and agriculture in the EU. Technology options for feeding 10 billion people synthesis report. Report for the Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) panel of the European Parliament, Institute for European Environmental Policy with BIO Intelligence Service, Ecologic Institute and IVM - VU University, At: [http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/cms/home/publications/studies].
    • Vanner, R, Bicket, M, Elliott, B, Harvey, C (2015). Public acceptability of DYNAMIX policy mixes. DYNAMIX deliverable D5.4.2. London: PSI.
    • Vanner, Robin, and Martha Bicket. 2013. The Use of Paradigms in DYNAMIX. Deliverable 1.1 of DYNAMIX. London: Policy Studies Institute. http://dynamix-project.eu/use-paradigmsdynamix.
    • Varela, T. 2011. Paris Cuts the Size of Outdoor Advertisements, in: MarketWatch, June 22, 2011, Webstory: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/paris-cuts-the-size-of-outdooradvertisments-2011-06-22 [Accessed 7 August 2014].
    • Veen, Peter, Richard Jefferson, Jacques de Smidt, and Jan van der Straaten (eds). 2009. Grasslands in Europe of High Nature Value. KNNV Publishing, Zeist, The Netherlands.
    • Vester, F. 2007. The art of Interconnected Thinking - Ideas and tools for tackling with complexity, Munich.
    • Vigneau, L, Humphreys, M., Moon, J. 2014. How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative, Journal of Business Ethics.
    • Von Witzke, H. and S. Noleppa. 2010. EU agricultural production and trade: Can more efficiency prevent increasing “land grabbing” outside of Europe? Research report. Humboldt University.
    • Vrijheid, M. 2010. Health Effects of Residence Near Hazardous Waste Landfill Sites: A Review of Epidemiologic Literature, in Environmental Health Perspectives Volume 108, Supplement 1
    • Wakamiya, A. 2011. “Wie viel Fläche braucht ein Mensch um sich zu ernähren?“ Ökologie & Landbau 159.
    • WBCSD. 2008. Sustainable Consumption Facts and Trends. From a business perspective. World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
    • Weed, B. and R. Morand. 2010. Automakers Face Challenges on the Road to Electrification, Copper Development Association. Available from http://www.copper.org/applications/automotive/electric-vehicles/green-car.html
    • Westhoek, H., T. Rood, M. van den Berg, J. Janse, D. Nijdam, M. Reudink, and E. Stehfest. 2011. The Protein Puzzle: The consumption and production of meat, dairy and fish in the European Union. PBL publication number: 500166001. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
    • Wiesmeth, Hans. 2012. 'Environmental Economics: Theory and Policy in Equilibrium', Springer.
    • Wiesmeth, Hans and Häckl, Dennis. 2011. 'How to successfully implement extended producer responsibility: considerations from an economic point of view', in Waste Management and Research, Vol. 29, pp. 891-901.
    • Withana, S. et al. 2013. Evaluation of environmental tax reform: International experiences. A report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) for the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) and the Federal Finance Administration (FFA) of Switzerland. Brussels.
    • Withana, S., P. ten Brink, A. Illes, S. Nanni, and E. Watkins. 2014. 'Environmental tax reform in Europe: Opportunities for the future, A report by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) for the Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Funded by projects


Cite this article