LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Massol, O.; Tchung-Ming, S. (2012)
Publisher: Department of Economics, City University London
Languages: English
Types: Book
Subjects: HB
The large-scale diffusion of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) imposes the construction of a sizeable CO2 pipeline infrastructure. This paper analyzes the conditions for a widespread adoption of CCS by a group of emitters that can be connected to a common pipeline system. It details a quantitative framework capable of assessing how the tariff structure and the regulatory constraints imposed on the pipeline operator impact the overall cost of CO2 abatement via CCS. This modeling framework is applied to the case of a real European CO2 pipeline project. We find that the obligation to use cross-subsidy-free pipeline tariffs has a minor impact on the minimum CO2 price required to adopt the\ud CCS. In contrast, the obligation to charge non-discriminatory prices can either impede the adoption of CCS or significantly raises that price. Besides, we compared two alternative regulatory frameworks for CCS pipelines: a common European organization as opposed to a collection of national regulations. The results indicate that the institutional scope of that regulation has a limited impact on the adoption of CCS compared to the detailed design of the tariff structure imposed to pipeline operators.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Al-Juaied, M., & Whitmore, A. (2009). Realistic Costs of Carbon Capture. Discussion Paper 2009-08, Energy Technology Innovation Research Group, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.
    • AndrĂ©, J., & Bonnans J.F. (2011). Optimal structure of gas transmission trunklines. Optimization and Engineering, 12(1-2), 175-198.
    • AndrĂ©, J., Bonnans, J.F., & Cornibert, L. (2009). Optimization of Capacity Expansion Planning for Gas Transportation Networks. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3), 1019-1027.
    • Bakken, B.H. & von Streng Velken, I. (2008). Linear Models for Optimization of Infrastructure for CO2 Capture and Storage. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 23(3), 824-833.
    • Bard, J.F. (1998). Practical bilevel optimization. Nonconvex optimization and its applications (Vol. 30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
    • Baumol, W.J. (1977). On the Proper Cost Tests for Natural Monopoly in a Multiproduct Industry. The American Economic Review, 67(5), 809-822.
    • Baumol, W.J., Bailey, E.E., & Willig, R.D. (1977). Weak Invisible Hand Theorems on the Sustainability of Multiproduct Natural Monopoly. The American Economic Review, 67(3), 350-365.
    • Berg, S., & Tschirhart, J. (1988). Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.
    • Betz, R., Sanderson, T., & Ancev, T. (2010). In or out: efficient inclusion of installations in an emissions trading scheme? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 37(2), 162-179. Buchanan, J.M. (1965). An Economic Theory of Clubs. Economica, 32(125), 1-14.
    • Yang, M., Blyth, W., Bradley, R., Bunn, D.W., Clarke, C., & Wilson, T. (2008). Evaluating the power investment options with uncertainty in climate policy. Energy Economics, 30(4), 1933-1950. for compression purposes is obtained using the engineering relations detailed in McCoy (2009, subsection 2.1.3 and Appendix A).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article