Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
McNeill, F.; Farrall, S.; Lightowler, C.; Maruna, S. (2012)
Publisher: Justice Research and Statistics Association, Inc.
Languages: English
Types: Article
This article aims to reexamine the development and scope of evidence-based practice (EBP) in community corrections by exploring three sets of issues. Firstly, we examine the relationships between the contested purposes of community supervision and their relationships to questions of evidence. Secondly, we explore the range of forms of evidence that might inform the pursuit of one purpose of supervision—the rehabilitation of offenders—making the case for a fuller engagement with “desistance” research in supporting this process. Thirdly, we examine who can and should be involved in conversations about EBP, arguing that both ex/offenders’ and practitioners’ voices need to be respected and heard in this debate.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Best, A., Terpstra, J.L., Moor, G., Riley, B., Norman, C.D. and Glasgow, R.E. (2009) 'Building knowledge integration systems for evidence-informed decisions', Journal of Health Organization and Management 23: 627-41.
    • Bonta, J. and Andrews, D. (2010). Viewing offender assessment and rehabilitation through the lens of the risk-needs-responsivity model. In McNeill, F., Raynor, P., and Trotter, C. (Eds.) Offender Supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
    • Bottoms, A., Shapland, J., Costello, A., Holmes, D. and Muir, G. (2004) 'Towards Desistance: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Empirical Study', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 43(4): 368-89.
    • Bottoms, A. and Shapland, J. (2011) "Steps Towards Desistance Amongst Male Young Adult Recidivists", in Farrall, S., Sparks, R., Hough, M. and Maruna, S. (eds) (2011) Escape Routes: Contemporary Perspectives on Life After Punishment, London, Routledge.
    • Buckley and Whelan (2009) Putting Research Evidence to Work: Key Issues for Research Utilisation in Irish Children's Services, Children Acts Advisory Board Research: Report No.2., Dublin: Children Acts Advisory Board.
    • Burnett, R. (1992) The Dynamics of Recidivism. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
    • Burnett, R. (2000) 'Understanding criminal careers through a series of in-depth interviews', Offender Programs Report, 4(1): 1-16.
    • Burnett, R. (2004) 'One-to-one Ways of promoting Desistance: In Search of an Evidence Base', in R. Burnett and C. Roberts (eds) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
    • Burnett, R. and McNeill, F. (2005) 'The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime', Probation Journal, 52(3): 247- 68.
    • Burnett, R. and Maruna, S. (2004) 'So ''prison works'' does it? The criminal careers of 130 men released from prison under Home Secretary, Michael Howard', Howard Journal, 43(4): 390-404.
    • Durnescu, I. (2008) 'An exploration of the purposes and outcomes of probation in European jurisdictions' Probation Journal 55(3): 273-281.
    • Farrall, S. (2002) Rethinking What Works With Offenders, Cullompton: Willan.
    • Farrall, S. (2004) 'Social Capital, Probation Supervision and Desistance from Crime', in S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Ex-Offender Reintegration and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan.
    • Farrall, S. and Bowling, B. (1999) 'Structuration, Human Development and Desistance from Crime', British Journal of Criminology, 39(2):252-67.
    • Farrall, S. and Calverley, A. (2006) Understanding Desistance from Crime, Crime and Justice Series, London: Open University Press.
    • Farrall, S., Sharpe, G., Hunter, B. and Calverley, A. (2011). Theorizing structural and individual-level processes in desistance and persistence: Outlining an integrated perspective. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44, 218-234.
    • Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A. and Rudolph, J. L. (2002) 'Gender, Crime and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation', American Journal of Sociology, 107: 990-1064.
    • Hollin, C., (2008) Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomization glister? Criminology & Criminal Justice 8(1): 89-106
    • Hough, M (2010). Gold Standard or Fool's Gold? The Pursuit of Certainty in Experimental Criminology. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 10, 11-22.
    • Landry, R., Amara, N. And Lamari, M. (2001) 'Utilisation of social science research knowledge in Canada' in Research Policy, 30(2): 333-349.
    • Laub, J. and Sampson, R. (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Delinquent Boys to Age Seventy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Leibrich, J. (1993) Straight to the Point: Angles On Giving Up Crime, Otago: University of Otago Press.
    • Lemert, E.M. (1951). Social Pathology: Systematic Approaches to the Study of Sociopathic Behaviour. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    • McCulloch, T. (2005) 'Probation, social context and desistance: Retracing the relationship', Probation Journal 52(1): 8-22.
    • McCulloch, P. and McNeill, F. (2007) 'Consumer society, commodification and offender management' Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(3): 223-242.
    • McCulloch, P. and McNeill, F. (2008) 'Desistance-Focussed Approaches' in S. Green, E. Lancaster and S. Feasey (eds.) Addressing Offending Behaviour: Context, practice and values. Cullompton: Willan.
    • McNeill, F. (2000) 'Defining effective probation: Frontline perspectives', Howard Journal, 39, 4: 382-97.
    • McNeill, F. (2003) 'Desistance Based Practice', in W-H. Chui and M. Nellis (eds.), Moving Probation Forward: Evidence, Arguments and Practice, Harlow: Pearson Education.
    • McNeill, F. (2006) 'A desistance paradigm for offender management' Criminology and Criminal Justice 6(1): 39-62.
    • McNeill, F. (2009a) 'What Works and What's Right' European Journal of Probation 1(1): 21-40.
    • McNeill, F. (2009b) Towards Effective Practice in Offender Supervision. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, available at: http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/documents/McNeil_Towards.pdf
    • McNeill, F. (2012) 'Four forms of offender rehabilitation: Towards an integrated perspective', Legal and Criminological Psychology 17(1): 18-36.
    • McNeill, F., Bracken, D. and Clarke, A. (2010) 'Social work and criminal justice' in I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, and R. Ruckdeschel (eds.) The Sage handbook of social work research, London and New York: Sage.
    • McNeill, F. Burnett, R. and McCulloch, T. (2010) Culture, Change and Community Justice. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Criminal Justice. Available at: http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/pubs/Culture-Change-and--CommunityJustice/251
    • McNeill, F and Maruna, S. (2007) 'Giving up and giving back: desistance, generativity and social work with offenders', in McIvor, G. and Raynor, P. (eds.), Developments in social work with offenders. research highlights in social work 48. London: Jessica Kingsley, pp. 224-239.
    • McNeill, F., Raynor, P. and Trotter, C. (eds.) (2010) Offender supervision: new directions in theory, research and practice. Cullompton: Willan.
    • McNeill, F. and Weaver, B. (2010) Changing Lives? Desistance Research and Offender Management. Glasgow: Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research. Available at: http://www.sccjr.ac.uk/documents/Report%202010%2003%20- %20Changing%20Lives.pdf
    • McNeill, F. and Whyte, B. (2007) Reducing Reoffending: Social Work and Community Justice in Scotland. Cullompton: Willan.
    • Maguire, M. and Raynor, P. (2006) 'How the resettlement of prisoners supports desistance from crime: Or does it? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(1): 19-38.
    • Maruna, S. (2001) Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington DC: American Psychological Association Books.
    • Maruna, S. (2011) 'Reentry as a rite of passage', Punishment and Society 13(1): 3- 28.
    • Maruna, S. and LeBel, T. (2003) 'Welcome Home? Examining the “Re-entry Court” Concept from a Strengths-based Perspective', Western Criminology Review, 4(2): 91-107.
    • Maruna, S. and Barber (2011). Why can't criminology be more like medical research?: Be careful what you wish for. In Bosworth, M. and Hoyle, C. (Eds.) What is Criminology? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    • Maruna, S. and Farrall, S. (2004). Desistance from Crime: A Theoretical Reformulation. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43.
    • Maruna, S. & LeBel, T. (2003). Welcome home? Examining the 're-entry court' concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review 4: 91-107.
    • Maruna, S. and LeBel, T. (2009). Strengths-Based Approaches to Reentry: Extra Mileage toward Reintegration and Destigmatization. Japanese Journal of Sociological Criminology, 34: 58-80.
    • Maruna, S., Immarigeon, R., and Lebel, T. (2004). Ex-Offender Reintegration: Theory and Practice. In Maruna, S. and Immarigeon, R. (eds) After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
    • Nutley, S (2003) Increasing research impact: early reflections from the ESRC Evidence Network, Working Paper 16, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, Queen Mary, University of London (Accessible via www.EvidenceNetwork.org).
    • Nutley S, Walter I and Davies H (2007) Using Evidence: How research can improve public services, Bristol: The Policy Press.
    • Nutley, S., Morton, S., Jung, T. and Boaz, A. (2010) 'Evidence and policy in six countries: diverse approaches and common challenges' in Evidence and Policy, 6(2) 131-144.
    • Paternoster, R. and Bushway, S. (2010). Desistance and the “Feared Self”: Towards and Identity Theory of Criminal Desistance. Criminology 99(4): 1103-1156.
    • Polaschek, D. (2012) 'An appraisal of the risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment', Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1): 1-17
    • Porporino, F. (2010) 'Bringing Sense and Sensitivity to Corrections: from programmes to 'fix' offenders to services to support desistance in Brayford, J., Cowe, F. and Deering, J. (eds.) What Else Works? Creative Work with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan
    • Priestley, P. and Vanstone, M. (2010) Offenders or Citizens? Readings in Rehabilitation. Cullopmton: Willan.
    • Raynor, P. (2004a) 'Rehabilitative and Reintegrative Approaches', in A. Bottoms, S. Rex and G. Robinson (eds) Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
    • Raynor, P. (2004b) 'Opportunity, Motivation and Change: Some Findings from Research on Resettlement', in R. Burnett and C. Roberts (eds) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
    • Raynor, P. (2008) 'Community penalties and Home Office research: On the way back to `nothing works'?' Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8: 73-87.
    • Rex, S (1999), 'Desistance from Offending: Experiences of Probation', Howard Journal, 38(4): 366-383.
    • Robinson, G. and McNeill, F. (2004). Purposes Matters: The Ends of Probation. In G. Mair (Ed.) What Matters in Probation Work. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
    • Robinson, G. (2008) 'Late-modern Rehabilitation: The Evolution of a Penal Strategy', Punishment and Society, 10, 4: 429-445.
    • Schwandt, T.A. (2005), 'The Centrality of Practice to Evaluation' The American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1): 95-105.
    • Sennett, R. (2003). Respect in a World of Inequality. New York: Norton.
    • Shonkoff , J (2000) 'Science, Policy and Practice: Three cultures in search of a shared mission' in Child Development 71(1): 181-187.
    • Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press.
    • Taxman, F., Henderson, C. and Lerch, J. (2010) The socio-political context of reforms in probation agwencues: impact on adoption of evidence-based practices', in McNeill, F., Raynor, P., and Trotter, C. (Eds.) Offender Supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
    • Van Kalmhout, A. and Durnescu, I (2008) 'European probation service systems: a comparative overview', in Probation in Europe. Nijmegen: Wolf, pp. 1-42.
    • Weaver, B. (2011) 'Co-producing Community Justice: The Transformative Potential of Personalisation for Penal Sanctions' British Journal of Social Work 41(6): 1038-1057.
    • Weaver, B. and McNeill, F. (2010) 'Travelling Hopefully: Desistance Research and Probation Practice' in Brayford, J., Cowe, F. and Deering, J. (eds.) What Else Works? Creative Work with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.
    • Weiss, C.H (1979) 'The Many Meanings of Research Utilization' in Public Administration Review, 39(5) 426-431.
    • White, W. (2000) 'Toward a New Recovery Movement: Historical Reflections on Recovery, Treatment and Advocacy', paper presented at the Centre for Substance Abuse Treatment, Recovery Community Support Program Conference, Alexandria, Virginia, April.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article