Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wadud, Z; MacKenzie, D; Leiby, P (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Experts predict that new automobiles will be capable of driving themselves under limited conditions within 5-10 years, and under most conditions within 10-20 years. Automation may affect road vehicle energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in a host of ways, positive and negative, by causing changes in travel demand, vehicle design, vehicle operating profiles, and choices of fuels. In this paper, we identify specific mechanisms through which automation may affect travel and energy demand and resulting GHG emissions and bring them together using a coherent energy decomposition framework. We review the literature for estimates of the energy impacts of each mechanism and, where the literature is lacking, develop our own estimates using engineering and economic analysis. We consider how widely applicable each mechanism is, and quantify the potential impact of each mechanism on a common basis: the percentage change it is expected to cause in total GHG emissions from light-duty or heavy-duty vehicles in the U.S. Our primary focus is travel related energy consumption and emissions, since potential lifecycle impacts are generally smaller in magnitude. We explore the net effects of automation on emissions through several illustrative scenarios, finding that automation might plausibly reduce road transport GHG emissions and energy use by nearly half – or nearly double them – depending on which effects come to dominate. We also find that many potential energy-reduction benefits may be realized through partial automation, while the major energy/emission downside risks appear more likely at full automation. We close by presenting some implications for policymakers and identifying priority areas for further research.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • AAA, 2012. Your Driving Costs, 2012 edition, Heathrow, FL.
    • Anderson, J.M., Karla, N., Stanley, K.D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., Oluwatola, O.A., 2014. Autonomous Vehicle Technology A Guide for Policymakers. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
    • ATRI, 2012. An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: A 2012 Update, September 2012.
    • Barth, M., Boriboonsomsin, K., 2009. Energy and emissions impacts of a freeway-based dynamic eco-driving system. Transport. Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 14 (6), 400-410.
    • Batley, R., Mackie, P., Bates, J., Fowkes, T., Hess, S., de Jong, G., Wardman, M., Fosgerau, M., 2010. Updating Appraisal Values for Travel Time Savings. Report to the Department for Transport, UK.
    • Berry, I.M., 2010. The effects of driving style and vehicle performance on the real-world fuel consumption of US light-duty vehicles (Masters thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
    • Bigman, D., 2014. Driverless cars coming to showrooms by 2020. Available at: (accessed January 2014).
    • Brown, A., Gonder, J., Repac, B., 2014. An analysis of possible energy impacts of automated vehicles, road vehicle automation. In: Meyer, Gereon, Beiker, Sven (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer International Publishing, pp. 137-153.
    • Cambridge Systematics, 2009. Assessment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Medium and Heavy Duty Vehicles: Commissioned Paper on Indirect Costs and Alternative Approaches, Draft final paper, Cambridge Systematics Inc. (revised 21.09.09).
    • Celent, 2012. [online]. A Scenario: The End of Auto Insurance. Available at: (accessed May 2013).
    • Cervero, R., Golub, A., Nee, B., 2007. City car share: longer-term travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transp. Res. Rec. 1992, 70-80.
    • Chester, M.V., Horvath, A., 2009. Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environ. Res. Lett. 4 (2), 024008.
    • CIS, 2015. Automated Driving: Legislative and Regulatory Action. Center for Internet and Society, Stanford University. Accessible online: .
    • Davis, S.C., Diegel, S.W., Boundy, R.G., 2012. Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 31. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL-6987. July, 2012.
    • Degraeuwe, B., Beusen, B., 2013. Corrigendum on the paper using on-board data logging devices to study the longer-term impact of an eco-driving course. Transport. Res. Part D: Transport Environ.
    • Duan, K., McDaniel, C., Muller, A., Yokota, B., Kleissl, J., 2007. Effects of Highway Slipstreaming on California Gas Consumption. June, 2007.
    • EPA, 2013. Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2012. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-420-R-13-001. March, 2013.
    • EPA, 2008. Average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger cars and light trucks. Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
    • Fagnant, D., Kockelman, K.M., 2013. Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations. Eno Centre for Transportation, Washington, DC.
    • Fagnant, D., Kockelman, K.M., 2014. The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transport. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 40, 1-13.
    • FHWA, 2005. Highway Economics Requirements System, State Version, Technical Report, US Department of Transportation.
    • FHWA/HDR-HLB Decision Economics, Inc. and ICF International, 2008. Freight Benefit/Cost Study: Phase III Analysis of Regional Benefits of Highway-Freight Improvements, prepared for the Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management and Operations, February 2008.
    • Gladwell, M., 2004. Big and Bad: How the SUV ran over Automotive Safety. The New Yorker, Jan 12, pp. 28-33.
    • Graham, D., Glaister, S., 2002. Review of Income and Price Elasticities of Demand for Road Traffic. Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London, London.
    • Graham, D., Glaister, S., 2004. Road traffic demand elasticity estimates: a review. Transp. Rev. 24 (3), 261-274.
    • Greene, D.L., 1998. Fuel availability and alternative fuel vehicles. Energy Stud. Rev. 8 (3), 215-231.
    • Greene, D.L., Plotkin, S.E., 2011. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from U.S. Transportation. The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES), pp. 1-103. Retrieved from .
    • He, Y., Rios, J., Chowdhury, M., Pisu, P., Bhavsar, P., 2012. Forward power-train energy management modeling for assessing benefits of integrating predictive traffic data into plug-in-hybrid electric vehicles. Transport. Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 17 (3), 201-207.
    • Ian Wallis Associates Ltd., 2014. Car passenger valuations of quantity and quality of time savings. NZ Transport Agency research report 551. Wellington, New Zealand.
    • IEEE, 2012. News release on Intelligent Transportation System. Available: (accessed Jan 2014).
    • Kasseris, E.P., 2006. Comparative Analysis of Automotive Powertrain Choices for The Near to Mid-term Future (Masters thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
    • Kobayashi, I., Tsubota, Y., Kawashima, H., 2007. Eco-driving Simulation: Evaluation of Eco-driving within a Network using Traffic Simulation. In Urban Transport XIII. Urban Transport and the Environment in the 21st Century.
    • Lu, X., Shladover, S., 2013. Automated Truck Platoon Control and Field Test. TRB Road Vehicle Automation Workshop, Stanford, CA. July 16, 2013.
    • Lyons, G., Jan, J., Holley, D., 2007. The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp. Res. Part A 41 (1), 107-120.
    • MacKenzie, D., 2013. Fuel Economy Regulations and Efficiency Technology Improvements in U.S. Cars Since 1975. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    • MacKenzie, D., Heywood, J., 2012. Acceleration performance trends and evolving relationship between power, weight, and acceleration in US light-duty vehicles. Transport. Res. Record: J. Transport. Res. Board 2287 (1), 122-131.
    • MacKenzie, D., Zoepf, S., Heywood, J., 2014. Determinants of US passenger car weight. Int. J. Veh. Des. 65 (1), 73-93.
    • Marchetti, C., 1994. Anthropological invariants in travel behaviour. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 47, 75-88.
    • Martin, E.W., Shaheen, S.A., 2011. Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 12 (4), December.
    • Melaina, M., Bremson, J., Solo, K., 2013. Consumer Convenience and the Availability of Retail Stations as a Market Barrier for Alternative Fuel Vehicles (NREL Conference Paper NREL/CP-5600-56898). Presented at the 31st USAEE/IAEE North American Conference Austin, Texas November 4-7, 2012.
    • Mensing, F., Bideaux, E., Trigui, R., Tattegrain, H., 2013. Trajectory optimization for eco-driving taking into account traffic constraints. Transport. Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 18, 55-61.
    • Mensing, F., Trigui, R., Bideaux, E., 2011, September. Vehicle trajectory optimization for application in ECO-driving. In: Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, pp. 1-6.
    • Mensing, F., Trigui, R., Bideaux, E., 2012, October. Vehicle trajectory optimization for hybrid vehicles taking into account battery state-of-charge. In: Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2012 IEEE. IEEE, pp. 950-955.
    • NHTSA, 2008. National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey, Report to Congress, US Department of Transportation, Springfield.
    • NHTSA, 2013. U.S. Department of Transportation Releases Policy on Automated Vehicle Development. NHTSA 14-13, Thursday, May 30, 2013. Available online: .
    • Nichols, B.G., Kockelman, K.M., 2014. Life-cycle energy implications of different residential settings: recognizing buildings, travel, and public infrastructure. Energ. Policy 68, 232-242.
    • Nicholas, M.A., Handy, S.L., Sperling, D., 2004. Using geographic information systems to evaluate siting and networks of hydrogen stations. Transp. Res. Rec. 1880, 126-134.
    • NRC (National Research Council) Committee on Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels, (2013). Transitions to Alternative Vehicles and Fuels.
    • Orfila, O., 2011. Impact of the Penetration Rate of Ecodriving on Fuel Consumption and Traffic Congestion. In YRS11: Young Researchers Seminar 2011.
    • Qian, G., Chung, E., 2011. Evaluating effects of eco-driving at traffic intersections based on traffic micro-simulation. In: Tisato, Peter, Oxlad, Lindsay, Taylor, Michael (Eds.), Evaluating Effects of Eco-driving at Traffic Intersections Based on Traffic Micro-simulation. PATREC, Adelaide Hilton Hotel, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, pp. 1-11.
    • Schäfer, A., Victor, D.G., 2000. The future mobility of the world population. Transp. Res. Part A 34 (3), 171-205.
    • Schipper, L., 2002. Sustainable urban transport in the 21st century: a new agenda. Transport. Res. Record: J. Transport. Res. Board 1792 (1), 12-19.
    • Schito, P., Braghin, F., 2012. Numerical and experimental investigation on vehicles in Platoon. SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 5 (1).
    • Scholz, T., Schmallowsky, A., Wauer, T., 2007. Auswirkungen eines allgemeinden tempolimits aufautobahnen im land Brandenburg. Schlothauer & Wauer, October, 2007.
    • Schrank, D., Eisele, B., Lomax, T., 2012. TTI's 2012 Urban Mobility Report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute, December, 2012.
    • Shladover, S., Su, D., Lu, X.Y., 2012. Impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on freeway traffic flow. Transport. Res. Record: J. Transport. Res. Board 2324, 63-70.
    • Small, K.A., 2012. Valuation of travel time. Econ. Transport. 1 (1).
    • Spieser, K., Treleaven, K., Zhang, R., Frazzoli, E., Morton, D., Pavone, M., 2014. Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore, Forthcoming in Road Vehicle Automation, Springer Lecture Notes in Mobility.
    • Trottenberg, P., 2011. Revised Departmental Guidance on Valuation of Travel Time in Economic Analysis. Memorandum to Secretarial Officers and Modal Administrators, U.S. Department of Transportation (28.09.11).
    • Tsugawa, S., 2013. Energy and Environmental Implications of Automated Truck Platooning within Energy ITS Project. TRB Road Vehicle Automation Workshop, Stanford, CA (16.07.13).
    • Underwood, S., 2014. Automated Vehicles Forecast: Vehicle Symposium Opinion Survey. Automated Vehicles Symposium 2014, Burlingame, CA (15.07.14).
    • Wadud, Z., 2011. Personal tradable carbon permits for road transport: why, why not and who wins? Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 45 (10), 1052-1065.
    • Wadud, Z., 2008. Personal Tradable Carbon Permits for Road Transport: Heterogeneity of Demand Responses and Distributional Analysis, PhD theses at Imperial College London, London.
    • Wardrop, M., 2009. Driverless Vehicles could be on Britain's Roads in 10 years. Available: (accessed Jan 2014).
    • Winebrake, James J., Green, Erin H., Comer, Bryan, Corbett, James J., Froman, Sarah, 2012. Estimating the direct rebound effect for on-road freight transportation. Energy Policy 48, 252-259.
    • White, J.B., 2010. Why 70 miles per hour is the new 55. The Wall Street J. (March 17)
    • Wu, C., Zhao, G., Ou, B., 2011. A fuel economy optimization system with applications in vehicles with human drivers and autonomous vehicles. Transport. Res. Part D: Transport Environ. 16 (7), 515-524.
    • Zabat, M., Stabile, N., Farascaroli, S., Browand, F., 1995. The Aerodynamic Performance of Platoons: A Final Report. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (January, 1995).
    • Zhu, H., Yang, Z., 2011. Simulation of the aerodynamic interaction of two generic sedans moving very closely. In: Electric Information and Control Engineering (ICEICE), 2011 International Conference on. April, IEEE, pp. 2595-2600.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article