Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bertolotti, Mauro; Catellani, Patrizia; Douglas, Karen; Sutton, Robbie M. (2013)
Publisher: Hogrefe
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, JA
In two experimental studies (conducted in Britain and Italy), participants read about a politician answering to leadership- versus morality-related allegations using either downward counterfactuals (“things could have been worse, if…”) or upward counterfactuals (“things could have been better, if…”). Downward messages increased the perception of the politician’s leadership, while both downward and upward messages increased morality perception. Political sophistication moderated the effect of message direction, with downward messages increasing perceived morality in low sophisticates and upward messages increasing perceived morality in high sophisticates. In the latter group, the acknowledgement of a responsibility-taking intent mediated morality judgment. Results were consistent across different countries, highlighting previously unexplored effects of communication on the perception of the “Big Two” dimensions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Carraro, L., Gawronski, B., & Castelli, L. (2010). Losing on all fronts: The effects of negative versus positive person-based campaigns on implicit and explicit evaluations of political candidates. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 453-470.
    • Catellani, P. (2011). Counterfactuals in the social context: The case of political interviews and their effects. In D. Birke, M. Butter., & T. Koeppe (Eds.), Counterfactual thinkingCounterfactual writing, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 81-94.
    • Cislak, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2006). The role of self-interest and competence in attitudes toward politicians. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 37, 203-212.
    • Cislak, A., & Wojciszke, B. (2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1103-1110.
    • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (third edition). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Delli Carpini, M.X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    • Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2006). When what you say about others says something about you: Language abstraction and inferences about describers' attitudes and goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 500-508.
    • Elder, T. J., Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M. (2005). Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticisms of the ingroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 231-244.
    • Epstude, K., & Roese, N. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168-192.
    • Fein, S. (1996). Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1164-1184.
    • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in cognitive sciences, 11, 77-83.
    • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P.,& Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from the perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
    • Fiske, S.T., Lau, R.R., & Smith, R.A. (1990). On the varieties and utilities of political expertise. Social Cognition, 8, 31-48.
    • Funk, C. L. (1996). The Impact of Scandal On Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits. Political Behavior, 18, 1-24.
    • Funk, C. L. (1997). Implications of Political Expertise in Candidate Trait Evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 675-697.
    • Gonzales, M. H. (1992).A thousand pardons: The effectiveness of verbal remedial tactics during account episodes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 133-151.
    • Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Martinich, A.P. (ed). Philosophy of Language. (pp. 165-175). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: A social identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365- 383.
    • Jones, P., & Hudson, J. (1996). The quality of political leadership: A case study of John Major. British Journal of Political Science, 26, 229-224.
    • Judd, C., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V., & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913.
    • Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 104-118.
    • Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In Lau, R. R., & Sears, D.O. (Eds.), Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507.
    • Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In Lupia, A., McCubbins, M., & Popkin S. (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (183-213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Luskin, R. (1990). Explaining Political Sophistication. Political Behavior, 12,
    • Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1993). The mental simulation of better and worse possible worlds. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 87- 109.
    • McGraw, K. M. (1990). Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications. British Journal of Political Science, 20, 119-131.
    • McGraw, K. M. (1991). Managing blame: An experimental test of the effects of political accounts. The American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1133-1157.
    • McGraw, K.M. (2001). Political accounts and attribution processes. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.
    • McGraw, K.M. (2003). Political impressions. In D.O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press
    • McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Jones, J. (2002). The pandering politicians of suspicious minds. Journal of Politics, 64, 362-383.
    • McGraw, K. M., Timpone, R., & Bruck, G. (1993). Justifying controversial political decisions: Home style in the laboratory. Political Behavior, 15, 289-308.
    • Miller, A.H., Wattenberg, M.P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessment of presidential candidates. The American Political Science Review, 80, 521-540.
    • Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603-610.
    • Mondak, J.J. (1995). Competence, integrity, and the electoral success of Congressional incumbents. Journal of Politics, 57, 1043-69.
    • Nario-Redmond, M., & Branscombe, N. (1996). It could have been better or it might have been worse: Implications for blame assignment in rape cases. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 347-366.
    • Newman, B. (2003). Integrity and presidential approval, 1980-2000. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 335-367.
    • Redlawsk, D. P., & Mccann, J. A. (2005). Popular interpretations of “corruption” and their partisan consequences. Political Behavior, 27, 261-283.
    • Sanna, L. J., Turley-Ames, K. J., & Meier, S. (1999). Mood, self-esteem, and simulated alternatives: Thought-provoking affective influences on counterfactual direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 543 - 558.
    • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Tedeschi, J. T., Riordan, C. A., Gaes, G. G., & Kane, T. (1983).Verbal accounts and attributions of social motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 218-225.
    • Vecchione, M., Gonzalez Castro, J.L., & Caprara G.V. (2011). Voters and leaders in the mirror of politics: Similarity in personality and voting choice in Italy and Spain. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 259-270.
    • Vonk, R. (1999). Impression formation and impression management: Motives, traits, and likeability inferred from self-promoting and self-deprecating behavior. Social Cognition, 17, 390-412.
    • Vonk, R. (2002). Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 512-526.
    • Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100- ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598.
    • Wong, E. M. (2010). It could have been better : The effects of counterfactual communication on impression formation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1251-1260 .
    • Wojciszke, B. (2005). Morality and competence in person- and self-perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155-188.
    • Wojciszke, B., & Abele, A.E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147.
    • Zaller, J. (1990). Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response. Social Cognition, 8, 125-153.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article