Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Liu, Chengyu; Griffiths, Clive; Murray, Alan; Zheng, Dingchang (2016)
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Journal: Blood Pressure Monitoring
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Korotkoff sound, blood pressure, bell and diaphragm, Devices and Technology, stethoscope characteristic, stethoscope tube length
OBJECTIVE\ud \ud This study investigated the effect of stethoscope side and tube length on auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measurement.\ud \ud METHODS\ud \ud Thirty-two healthy participants were studied. For each participant, four measurements with different combinations of stethoscope characteristics (bell or diaphragm side, standard or short tube length) were each recorded at two repeat sessions, and eight Korotkoff sound recordings were played twice on separate days to one experienced listener to determine the systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP). Analysis of variance was carried out to study the measurement repeatability between the two repeat sessions and between the two BP determinations on separate days, as well as the effects of stethoscope side and tube length.\ud \ud RESULTS\ud \ud There was no significant paired difference between the repeat sessions and between the repeat determinations for both SBP and DBP (all P-values>0.10, except the repeat session for SBP using short tube and diaphragm). The key result was that there was a small but significantly higher DBP on using the bell in comparison with the diaphragm (0.66 mmHg, P=0.007), and a significantly higher SBP on using the short tube in comparison with the standard length (0.77 mmHg, P=0.008).\ud \ud CONCLUSION\ud \ud This study shows that stethoscope characteristics have only a small, although statistically significant, influence on clinical BP measurement. Although this helps understand the measurement technique and resolves questions in the published literature, the influence is not clinically significant.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1 Netea RT, Lenders JW, Smits P, Thien T. Both body and arm position significantly influence blood pressure measurement. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17:459-462.
    • 2 Beevers G, Lip GY, O'Brien E. ABC of hypertension: blood pressure measurement. Part II-conventional sphygmomanometry: technique of auscultatory blood pressure measurement. BMJ 2001; 322:1043-1047.
    • 3 Pan F, Zheng D, He P, Murray A. Does the position or contact pressure of the stethoscope make any difference to clinical blood pressure measurements: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2014; 93:e301.
    • 4 Drzewiecki GM, Melbin J, Noordergraaf A. The Korotkoff sound. Ann Biomed Eng 1989; 17:325-359.
    • 5 Welsby PD, Parry G, Smith D. The stethoscope: some preliminary investigations. Postgrad Med J 2003; 79:695-698.
    • 6 Abella M, Formolo J, Penney DG. Comparison of the acoustic properties of six popular stethoscopes. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91 (4 Pt 1):2224-2228.
    • 7 Campbell IW. MacLeod's clinical examination. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
    • 8 Turner R, Blackwood R. Lecture notes on clinical skills. Edinburgh: Blackwell Science; 1997.
    • 9 Swash M. Hutchison's clinical methods. Edinburgh: WB Saunders; 2002.
    • 10 Coviello Jessica S. Auscultation skills - breath and heart sounds. Pennsylvania: Springhouse Corporation; 1999.
    • 11 Jeferies A, Turkley A. Mosby's crash course - respiratory system. London: Mosby; 1998.
    • 12 Ogilvie C, Evans CC. Chamberlain's symptoms and signs in clinical medicine: an introduction to medical diagnosis. London: Butterworth Heinemann; 1997.
    • 13 Bourke SJ. Lecture notes on respiratory medicine. Edinburgh: Blackwell Science; 1998.
    • 14 Welsby PD. An illustrated colour text - clinical history taking and examination. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1996.
    • 15 [No authors listed]. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:2413-2446.
    • 16 Chalmers J, et al. WHO-ISH Hypertension Guidelines Committee. 1999 World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. J Hypertens 1999; 17:151-183.
    • 17 Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee; Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42:1206-1252.
    • 18 O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G, et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21:821-848.
    • 19 Handler J. The importance of accurate blood pressure measurement. Perm J 2009; 13:51-54.
    • 20 Jones DW, Appel LJ, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ, Lenfant C. Measuring blood pressure accurately: new and persistent challenges. JAMA 2003; 289:1027-1030.
    • 21 Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360:1903-1913.
    • 22 Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2005; 111:697-716.
    • 23 Zheng D, Giovannini R, Murray A. Effect of respiration, talking and small body movements on blood pressure measurement. J Hum Hypertens 2012; 26:458-462.
    • 24 Murray A, Zheng D, Bowers EJ, Langley P, King ST, Sims AJ. Physiological causes of variability in blood pressure measurement. Lecture Note Series 2008; International Centre for Biocybernetics, Polish Academy of Sciences 2008.
    • 25 Arveschoug AK, Revsbech P, Brøchner-Mortensen J. Sources of variation in the determination of distal blood pressure measured using the strain gauge technique. Clin Physiol 1998; 18:361-368.
    • 26 Mauro AM. Effects of bell versus diaphragm on indirect blood pressure measurement. Heart Lung 1988; 17:489-494.
    • 27 Prineas RJ, Jacobs D. Quality of Korotkoff sounds: bell vs. diaphragm, cubital fossa vs. brachial artery. Prev Med 1983; 12:715-719.
    • 28 Kantola I, Vesalainen R, Kangassalo K, Kariluoto A. Bell or diaphragm in the measurement of blood pressure? J Hypertens 2005; 23:499-503.
    • 29 Cushman WC, Cooper KM, Horne RA, Meydrech EF. Effect of back support and stethoscope head on seated blood pressure determinations. Am J Hypertens 1990; 3:240-241.
    • 30 Rappaport MB, Sprague HB. The effects of tubing bore on stethoscope efficiency. Am Heart J 1951; 42:605-609.
    • 31 Ertel PY, Lawrence M, Brown RK, Stern AM. Stethoscope acoustics. II. Transmission and filtration patterns. Circulation 1966; 34:899-909.
    • 32 Hampton CS, Chaloner A. Which stethoscope? Br Med J 1967; 4:388-390.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | Novel engineering solution...
  • RCUK | Development of an intellig...

Cite this article