LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ahmed, F.; Václavovic, P.; Teferle, F. N.; Douša, J.; Bingley, R.; Laurichesse, D. (2016)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: GPS Solutions
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Ambiguity resolution, : Sciences de la terre & géographie physique [G02] [Physique, chimie, mathématiques & sciences de la terre], Earth and Planetary Sciences(all), GNSS, : Earth sciences & physical geography [G02] [Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences], Precise point positioning, GPS, Real time, Zenith total delay
The continuous evolution of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) meteorology has led to an increased use of associated observations for operational modern low-latency numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, which assimilate GNSS-derived zenith total delay (ZTD) estimates. The development of NWP models with faster assimilation cycles, e.g., 1-h assimilation cycle in the rapid update cycle NWP model, has increased the interest of the meteorological community toward sub-hour ZTD estimates. The suitability of real-time ZTD estimates obtained from three different precise point positioning software packages has been assessed by comparing them with the state-of-the-art IGS final troposphere product as well as collocated radiosonde (RS) observations. The ZTD estimates obtained by BNC2.7 show a mean bias of 0.21 cm, and those obtained by the G-Nut/Tefnut software library show a mean bias of 1.09 cm to the IGS final troposphere product. In comparison with the RS-based ZTD, the BNC2.7 solutions show mean biases between 1 and 2 cm, whereas the G-Nut/Tefnut solutions show mean biases between 2 and 3 cm with the RS-based ZTD, and the ambiguity float and ambiguity fixed solutions obtained by PPP-Wizard have mean biases between 6 and 7 cm with the references. The large biases in the time series from PPP-Wizard are due to the fact that this software has been developed for kinematic applications and hence does not apply receiver antenna eccentricity and phase center offset (PCO) corrections on the observations. Application of the eccentricity and PCO corrections to the a priori coordinates has resulted in a 66 % reduction of bias in the PPP-Wizard solutions. The biases are found to be stable over the whole period of the comparison, which are criteria (rather than the magnitude of the bias) for the suitability of ZTD estimates for use in NWP nowcasting. A millimeter-level impact on the ZTD estimates has also been observed in relation to ambiguity resolution. As a result of a comparison with the established user requirements for NWP nowcasting, it was found that both the G-Nut/Tefnut solutions and one of the BNC2.7 solutions meet the threshold requirements, whereas one of the BNC2.7 solution and both the PPP-Wizard solutions currently exceed this threshold.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Askne J, Nordius H (1987) Estimation of tropospheric delay for microwaves from surface weather data. Radio Sci 22:379-386
    • Benjamin SG, Jamison BD, Moninger WR, Sahm SR, Schwartz BE, Schlatter TW (2010) Relative short-range forecast impact from aircraft, profiler, radiosonde, VAD, GPS-PW, METAR and mesonet observations via the RUC hourly assimilation cycle. Mon Weather Rev 138(4):1319-1343
    • Bennitt G, Levick T (2011) The impact of assimilating zenith total delay measurements from ground-based GNSS receivers in the Met Office numerical weather prediction UK model. Geophys Res Abstr vol 13, EGU2011-6705
    • Bevis M, Businger S, Chiswell S, Herring TA, Anthes RA, Rocken C, Ware RH (1994) GPS meteorology: mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water. J Appl Meteorol 33(3):379-386
    • Brian CA, Clifford FM, Kirby C, Brad C (2014) Comparison of surface wind and temperature analyses from an ensemble Kalman filter and the NWS real-time mesoscale analysis system. Weather Forecast 29:1058-1075
    • Byram S, Hackman C, Slabinski V, Tracey J (2011) Computation of a high-precision GPS-based troposphere product by the USNO. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, Institute of Navigation, Portland, Oregon, USA, pp 572-578
    • Byun SH, Bar-Sever YE (2009) A new type of troposphere zenith path delay product of the international GNSS Service. J Geodesy 83(3-4):1-7
    • Caissy M, Agrotis L, Weber G, Hernandez-Pajares M, Hugentobler U (2012) The international GNSS real-time service. GPS World 23(6):p52
    • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (eds) (2007) Bernese GPS software version 5.0, 612, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern
    • De Haan S (2011) Impact of GPS ZTD on rainfall estimates in an hourly update cycle of a numerical weather prediction model. Geophys Res Abstr vol 13, EGU2011-4222
    • Dousˇa J (2012) The impact of errors in predicted GPS orbits on zenith troposphere delay estimation. GPS Solut 14(3):229-239
    • Dousˇa J, Elias M (2014) An improved model for calculating tropospheric wet delay. Geophys Res Lett 41:4389-4397. doi:10.1002/2014GL060271
    • Dousˇa J, Vaclavovic P (2014) Real-time zenith tropospheric delays in support of numerical weather prediction applications. Adv Space Res 53(9):1347-1358
    • Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geodesy 83(3-4):191-198
    • Elgered G (2001) An overview of COST Action 716: exploitation of ground-based GPS for climate and numerical weather prediction applications. Phys Chem Earth Part A 26(6-8):399-404
    • Fritsche M, Dietrich R, Kno¨fel C, Ru¨lke A, Vey S (2005) Impact of higher-order ionospheric terms on GPS estimates. Geophys Res Lett 32:L23311. doi:10.1029/2005GL024342
    • Geng J, Teferle FN, Shi C, Meng X, Dodson AH, Liu J (2009) Ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning with hourly data. GPS Solut 13(4):263-270
    • Geng J, Meng X, Dodson AH, Teferle FN (2010) Integer ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning: method comparison. J Geodesy 84(9):569-581
    • Glowacki TJ, Penna NT, Bourke WP (2006) Validation of GPS-based estimates of integrated water vapour for the Australian region and identification of diurnal variability. Aust Meteorol Mag 55:131-148
    • Gutman SI, Sahm SR, Benjamin SG, Schwartz BE, Holub KL, Stewart JQ, Smith TL (2004) Rapid retrieval and assimilation of ground based GPS precipitable water observations at the NOAA forecast systems laboratory: impact on weather forecasts. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 82(1B):351-360
    • Gyori G, Dousˇa J (2013) GOP-TropDB development for tropospheric product evaluation and monitoring-design, functionality and initial results. In: Rizos C, Willis P (eds), IAG symposia series, vol 143. Springer (accepted for publication)
    • Hill EM, Davis JL, Elo´segui P, Wernicke BP, Malikowski E, Niemi NA (2009) Characterization of site-specific GPS errors using a short-baseline network of braced monuments at Yucca Mountain, southern Nevada. J Geophys Res 114:B11402. doi:10.1029/ 2008JB006027
    • Huang XY et al (2003) TOUGH: targeting optimal use of GPS humidity measurements in meteorology. In: Proceedings of international workshop on GPS meteorology, Tsukuba, Japan, 14-17 January 2003
    • Iwabuchi T, Naito I, Mannoji N (2000) A comparison of global positioning system retrieved precipitable water vapor with the numerical weather prediction analysis data over the Japanese Islands. J Geophys Res 105(4573-4585):C2000
    • Jones J, Guerova G, Dousa J, de Haan S, Bock O, Dick G, Pottiaux E, Pacione R (2014) COST Action ES1206 : advanced global navigation satellite systems tropospheric products for monitoring severe weather events and climate (GNSS4SWEC). Geophys Res Abstr vol 16, EGU2014-14097
    • Lagler K, Schindelegger M, Boehm J, Kra´sna´ H, Nilsson T (2013) GPT2: empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophys Res Lett 40:1069-1073. doi:10.1002/grl. 50288
    • Laurichesse D (2011) The CNES real-time PPP with undifferenced integer ambiguity resolution demonstrator. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2011, Institute of Navigation, Portland, OR, 654-662
    • Laurichesse D, Mercier F, Berthias JP, Broca P, Cerri L (2009) Integer ambiguity resolution on undifferenced GPS phase measurements and its application to PPP and satellite precise orbit determination. Navigation 56(2):135-149
    • Li X, Dick G, Ge M, Heise S, Wickert J, Bender M (2014) Real-time GPS sensing of atmospheric water vapor: precise point positioning with orbit, clock, and phase delay corrections, Geophys Res Lett, 41. doi:10.1002/2013GL058721
    • Loyer S, Perosanz F, Mercier F, Capdeville H, Marty J-C (2012) Zero-difference GPS ambiguity resolution at CNES-CLS IGS analysis center. J Geodesy 86(11):991-1003
    • NERC Centres for Atmospheric Science-British Atmospheric Data Centre (2006) http://badc.nerc.ac.uk/view/badc.nerc.ac.uk__ ATOM__dataent_GLOBRADS
    • Ning T (2012) GPS meteorology: with focus on climate applications, PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, ISBN 978-91- 7385-675-1
    • Offiler D (2010) Product requirements document version 1.0-21 December 2010. EIG EUMETNET GNSS Water Vapour Programme (E-GVAP-II)
    • Park C-G, Roh K-M, Cho J (2012) Radiosonde sensors bias in precipitable water vapor from comparisons with global positioning system measurements. J Astron Space Sci 29(3):295-303
    • Shi J, Gao Y (2012) Improvement of PPP-inferred tropospheric estimates by integer ambiguity resolution. Adv Space Res 50(10):1374-1382
    • Smith TL, Benjamin SG, Gutman SI, Sahm SR (2007) Forecast impact from assimilation of GPS-IPW observations into the rapid update cycle. Mon Weather Rev 135(8):2914-2930
    • Thomas ID, King MA, Clarke PJ, Penna NT (2011) Precipitable water vapor estimates from homogeneously reprocessed GPS data: an intertechnique comparison in Antarctica. J Geophys Res, 116. doi:10.1029/2010JD013889
    • Tregoning P, Herring TA (2006) Impact of a priori zenith hydrostatic delay errors on GPS estimates of station heights and zenith total delays. Geophys Res Lett 33:L23303. doi:10.1029/ 2006GL027706
    • Va´clavovic P, Dousˇa J, Gyori G (2013) G-Nut software library-state of development and first results. Acta Geodyn Geomater 10(172) (in print)
    • Vedel H, Huang X-Y, Haase J, Ge M, Calais E (2004) Impact of GPS zenith tropospheric delay data on precipitation forecasts in Mediterranean France and Spain. Geophys Res Lett 31:L02102. doi:10.1029/2003GL017715
    • Vedel H, de Haan S, Jones J, Bennitt G, Offiler D (2013) E-GVAP third phase. Geophys Res Abstr vol 15, EGU2013-10919
    • Weber G, Mervart L (2012) BKG Ntrip Client (BNC) version 2.7 manual, federal agency for cartography and geodesy, Frankfurt, Germany
    • Weber G, Dettmering D, Gebhard H (2006) Networked transport of RTCM via internet protocol (NTRIP). IAG Symp Ser 128:60-64
    • Wu¨bbena G, Schmitz M, Bagge A (2005) PPP-RTK: precise point positioning using state-space representation in RTK networks. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2005, Institute of Navigation, Portland, OR, pp 2584-2594
    • Yuan Y, Zhang K, Rohm W, Choy S, Norman R, Wang C-S (2014) Real-time retrieval of precipitable water vapor from GPS precise point positioning. J Geophys Res Atmos, 119. doi:10.1002/ 2014JD021486
    • Zumberge JF, Heftin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102(B3):5005-5017
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.