Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Alonso, Hany; Granadeiro, José Pedro; Waap, Silke; Xavier, José; Symondson, William Oliver Christian; Ramos, Jaime A .; Catry, Paulo (2014)
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Q1
wledge of the dietary choices and trophic niches of organisms is the key to understanding their roles in ecosystems. In seabird diet studies, prey identification is a difficult challenge, often yielding results with technique-specific biases. Additionally, sampling efforts are often not extensive enough to reveal intrapopulational variation. Immature animals, which may constitute up to 50% of a population, may occupy a significantly different trophic niche to more experienced birds, but this remains largely unexplored. We investigated the diet of Cory's shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) from Selvagem Grande, an island located off the northwest African coast, collecting a total of 698 regurgitate samples over three consecutive breeding seasons. The diet was assessed using two complementary approaches for prey identification: conventional morphological analysis (using fish vertebrae, otoliths and cephalopod beaks) and DNA barcoding of the 16S rRNA mitochondrial gene, in cases where a positive identification could not be retrieved. Species assignments employed BLAST and distance-based methods, as well as direct optimization of the tree length based on unaligned sequences in POY. This method resulted in robust tree estimates and species assignments, showing its potential for DNA barcoding of stomach contents using hypervariable markers such as the 16S. The molecular approach increased taxonomic resolution and revealed an additional 17 taxa. Diet differed significantly according to breeding status, sex, breeding phase (prelaying and chick rearing) and year. Such direct evidence of trophic segregation within the same population has rarely been shown in seabirds and highlights the importance of including such variables in ecosystem-based management approaches.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology, 215, 403–410.
    • Barnett A, Redd KS, Frusher SD, Stevens JD, Semmens JM (2010) Non lethal method to obtain stomach samples from a large marine predator and the use of DNA analysis to improve dietary information. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 393, 188–192.
    • Barrett RT, Camphuysen KCJ, Anker Nilssen T, Chardine JW, Furness RW, Garthe S, Hüppop O, Leopold MF, Montevecchi WA, Veit RR (2007) Diet studies of seabirds: a review and recommendations. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 6F4,1675–1691.
    • Belda EJ, Sanchez A (2001) Seabird mortality on longline fisheries in the western Mediterranean: factors o affecting bycatch and proposed mitigating measures. Biological Conservation, 98, 357–363.
    • Bowen WD, Iverson SJ (2013) rMethods of estimating marine mammal diets: A review of validation experiments and sources of bias and uncertainty. Marine Mammal Science, 29, 719–754. R
    • Bowser AK, Diamond AW, Addison JA (2013) From Puffins to Plankton: A DNA Based Analysis of a Seabird Food Chain in the Northern Gulf of Meaine. PloS ONE, 8, e83152. v
    • Castillo Guerrero JA, Mellink E (2011) Occasional inter sex differences in diet and foraging behavior of the Blue footed Booby: maximizing chick rearing in a variable environment? Journal of Ornithology, 152, 269– 277. ie
    • Dai L, Zheng X, Kong L, Li Q (2012) DNA barcoding analysis of Coleoidea (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) from Chinese waters. Molecular Ecology Resources, 12, 43w7–447.
    • Daunt F, Wanless S, Harris MP, Money L, Monaghan P (2007) Older and wiser: improvements in breeding success are linked to better foraging performance in European Oshags. Functional Ecology, 21, 561–567.
    • Deagle BE, Chiaradia A, McInnes J, Jarman SN (2010) Pyrosequencing faecal DNA to determine diet of little penguins: is what goes in what comes out? Conservation Genetics, 11, n2039–2048. l
    • Deagle BE, Gales NJ, Evans K, Jarman SN, Robinson S, Trebilco R, Hindell MA (2007) Studying seabird diet through genetic analysis of faeces: a case study on macaroni penguins (Eudyyptes chrysolophus). PLoS ONE, 2, e831.
    • De Laet (2010) Letter to the editor. A problem in POY tree searches (and its work around) when some sequences are observed to be absent in some terminals. Cladistics, 26, 453–455.
    • den Hartog JC , Clarke MR (1996) A study of stomach contents of Cory's Shearwater, Calonectris diomedea borealis (Cory, 1881) (Aves: Procellariidae), from the Macaronesian Islands. Zoologische Mededeelingen, 70, 117–133.
    • Dunn MR, Szabo A, McVeagh MS, Smith PJ (2010) The diet of deepwater sharks and the benefits of using DNA identification of prey. Deep Sea Research Part I, 57, 923–930.
    • Forero MG, Hobson KA, Bortolotti GR, Donázar JA, Bertellotti M, Blanco G (2002) Food resource utilisation by the Magellanic penguin evaluated through stable isotope analysis: segregation by sex and age and influence on offspring quality. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 234, 289–299.
    • Goss Custard JD, Durell SLVD, McGrorty S, Reading CJ (1982) Use of mussel Mytilus edulis beds by oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus according to age and population size. Journal of Animal Ecology, 51, 543–554.
    • Granadeiro JP (1993) Variation in measurements of Cory’s Shearwater between populations and sexing by discriminant analysis. Ringing and Migration, 14, 103–112.
    • Granadeiro JP, Alonso H, Almada V, Menezes D, Phillips RA, Catry P (2009) Mysterious attendance cycles in Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea: an exploration of patterns and hypotheses. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1455–1462.
    • Granadeiro JP, Monteiro LR, Furness RW (1998) Diet and feeding ecology of Cory’s shearwater Calonectris diomedea in the Azores, north east Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 166, 267–276.
    • Granadeiro JP, Dias FMP, Rebelo R, Santos CD, Catry P (2006) Numbers and population trends of Cory’s Shearwater Calonectris odiomedea at Selvagem Grande, northeast Atlantic. Waterbirds, 29, 56–60.
    • Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: a user friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Syrmposium Series, 41, 95 98.
    • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, RdeWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Biological Sciences, 270, 313–321.
    • Jarman SN, Gales NJ, Tierney M, Gill PC, eElliott NG (2002) A DNA based method for identification of krill species and its application to analysing the vdiet of marine vertebrate predators. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2679– 2690. i
    • Jarman SN, McInnes JC, Faux C, Polanowski AM, Mearthick J, Deagle BE, Southwell C, Emmerson L (2013) w Adélie Penguin Population Diet Monitoring by Analysis of Food DNA in Scats. PloS ONE, 8, e82227.
    • Jedlicka JA, Sharma AM, Almeida RP (2013) Molecular tools reveal diets of insectivorous birds from predator fecal matter. Conservation Genetics Resources, 5, 879–885.
    • Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates Oof base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111–120. n
    • Kitowski I (2003) Age related differences in foraging behavior of Montagu's harrier Circus pygargus males in south east Poland. Acta Ethologica, 6, 35–38. l
    • Kochzius M, Seidel C, Antoniou A, Botla SK, Campo D, Cariani A, Vazquez EyG,Hauschild J, Hervet C, Hjorleifsdóttir S, Hreggvidsson G, Kappel K, Landi M, Magoulas A, Marteinsson V, Nolte M, Planes S, Tinti F, Turan C, Venugopal MN, Weber H, Blohm D (2010) Identifying fishes through DNA barcodes and microarrays. PLoS ONE, 5, e12620.
    • Lewallen EA, Pitman RL, Kjartanson SL, Lovejoy NR (2011) Molecular systematics of flyingfishes (Teleostei: Exocoetidae): evolution in the epipelagic zone. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 102, 161–174.
    • Lucifora LO, García VB, Menni RC, Escalante AH, Hozbor NM (2009) Effects of body size, age and maturity stage on diet in a large shark: ecological and applied implications. Ecological Research, 24, 109–118.
    • Moritz C, Cicero C (2004) DNA Barcoding: Promise and Pitfalls. PLoS Biology, 2, e354.
    • Mougin J L, Jouanin C, Roux F (1997) Intermittent breeding in Cory’s Shearwater Calonectris diomedea of Selvagem Grande, North Atlantic. Ibis, 139, 40–44.
    • Naito Y, Costa DP, Adachi T, Robinson PW, Fowler M, Takahashi A (2013) Unravelling the mysteries of a mesopelagic diet: a large apex predator specializes on small prey. Functional Ecology, 27, 710–717.
    • Navarro J, González Solís J, Viscor G (2007) Nutritional and feeding ecology in Cory’s shearwater Calonectris diomedea during breeding. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 351, 261–271.
    • Navarro J, Kaliontzopoulou A, Gonzalez Solis J (2009) Sexual dimorphism in bill morphology and feeding ecology in Cory’s shearwater (Calonectris diomedea). Zoology, 112, 128–138.
    • Neves VC, Nolf D, Clarke M (2012) Spatio temporal variation in the diet of Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea in the Azores archipelago, north east Atlantic. Deep Sea Research Part I, 70, 1–13.
    • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2011) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.0 2. http://CRAN.R project.org/packaFge=vegan
    • Oro D, Torres R, RodríguoezC, Drummond H (2010) Climatic influence on demographic parameters of a tropical seabird varies with age and sex. Ecology, 91, 1205–1214.
    • Paiva VH, Xavier JC , GeraldersP, Ramírez I, Garthe S, Ramos JA (2010) Foraging ecology of Cory’s shearwaters in different oceanic Renvironments of the North Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 410, 257–268.
    • Paiva VH, Geraldes P, Marques V, Rodrígeuez R, Garthe S, Ramos JA (2013) Effects of environmental variability on different trophic levels of the vNorth Atlantic food web. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 477, 15–28. i
    • Palumbi SR (1996) Nucleic acids II: the polymerase echain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Mable BK, Moritz C (eds) w Molecular Systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 205–247.
    • Phillips RA, McGill RAR, Dawson DA, Bearhop S (2011) Sexual segregation in distribution, diet and trophic level of seabirds: insights from stable isotope analysis. Marine Biology, 158, 2199–2208.
    • Phillips RA, Silk JRD, Phalan B, Catry P, Croxall JP (2004) SeasOonalsexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or foraging niche divergence? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Biological Sciences, 2n71,1283–1291.
    • Polis GA (1984) Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific relsource partitioning: can age groups function as ecological species? American Naturalist, 123, 541-564. y
    • Pompanon F, Deagle BE, Symondson WOC, Brown DS, Jarman SD, Taberlet P (2012) Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Molecular Ecology, 21, 1931-1950.
    • Quéro J C, Porché P, Vayne JJ (2003) Guide des Poissons de l’Atlantique Européen. Delachaux & Niestlé, Paris.
    • R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2.10.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
    • Ramos JA, Granadeiro JP, Phillips RA, Catry P (2009) Flight morphology and foraging behaviour of male and female Cory’s Shearwaters. Condor, 111, 424–432.
    • Ramos R, Granadeiro JP, Rodríguez B, Navarro J, Paiva VH, Bécares J, Reyes González JM, Fagundes I, Ruiz A, Arcos P, González Solís J, Catry P (2013) Meta population feeding grounds of Cory’s shearwater in the subtropical Atlantic Ocean: implications for the definition of Marine Protected Areas based on tracking studies. Diversity and Distributions, 19, 1284–1298.
    • Symondson WOC (2002) Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Molecular Ecology, 11, 627–641.
    • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA 6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30, 2725–2729.
    • Thibault J C, Bretagnolle V, Rabouam C (1997) Calonectris diomedea Cory’s Shearwater. Birds of the Western Palearctic Update, 1, 75–98.
    • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighing, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research, 22, 4673–4680.
    • Tuset VM, Lombarte A, Assis CA (2008) Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Scientia Marina, 72, 7–198.
    • Valdez Moreno M, QFuintal Lizama C, Gómez Lozano R, García Rivas MdC (2012) Monitoring an alien invasion: DNA barcodoingand the identification of lionfish and their prey on coral reefs of the Mexican caribbean. PLoS ONE, 7, e36636.
    • Varón A, Vinh LS, Wheeler WrC(2010) POY version 4: phylogenetic analysis using dynamic homologies. Cladistics, 26, 72–85. R
    • Votier SC, Grecian WJ, Patrick S, Newton J (2011) Inter colony movements, at sea behaviour and foraging in an immature seabird: results from GPS PeTTtracking, radiotracking and stable isotope analysis. Marine Biology, 158, 355–362. v i
    • Weimerskirch H, Le Corre M, Ropert Coudert Y, Kato A, Marsac F (2006) Sex specific foraging behaviour in a seabird with reversal sexual dimorphism: the red efooted booby. Oecologia, 146, 681–691.
    • Wilson RP (1984) An improved stomach pump for penguins wand other seabirds. Journal of Field Ornithology, 55, 109–112.
    • Wilson LJ, Daunt F, Wanless S (2004) Self feeding and chick provisioning diet differ in the common guillemot Uria aalge. Ardea, 92, 197–208. O
    • Wilson JJ, Rougerie R, Schonfeld J, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hajibabaei M, Kitching IJ, Haxaire J, Hebert n PDN (2011) When species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly assigned to higher taxa? An assessment using sphingid moths. BMC Ecology, 11, 1–14. l
    • Xavier JC, Croxall JP (2005) Sexual differences in foraging behaviour and diets: yacase study of wandering albatrosses. In: Ruckstuhl KE, Neuhaus P (eds) Sexual segregation in vertebrates: ecology of the two sexes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 74–91.
    • Xavier JC, Magalhães MC, Mendonça AS, Antunes M, Carvalho N, Machete M, Santos RS, Paiva V, Hamer KC (2011) Changes in diet of Cory’s Shearwaters Calonectris diomedea breeding in the Azores. Marine Ornithology, 39, 129–134.
    • Zavalaga CB, Benvenuti S, Dall'Antonia L, Emslie SD (2007) Diving behavior of blue footed boobies Sula nebouxii in northern Peru in relation to sex, body size and prey type. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 336, 291–303.
    • Zhang J, Hanner R (2012) Molecular approach to the identification of fish in the South China Sea. PLoS ONE, 7, e30621.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • FCT | PTDC/MAR/71927/2006

Cite this article