Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Ricketts, Jessie; Bishop, D. V. M. (Dorothy V. M.); Nation, Kate (2009)
Publisher: Psychology Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: PE, LB
An experiment investigated whether exposure to orthography facilitates oral vocabulary learning. A total of 58 typically developing children aged 8-9 years were taught 12 nonwords. Children were trained to associate novel phonological forms with pictures of novel objects. Pictures were used as referents to represent novel word meanings. For half of the nonwords children were additionally exposed to orthography, although they were not alerted to its presence, nor were they instructed to use it. After this training phase a nonword-picture matching posttest was used to assess learning of nonword meaning, and a spelling posttest was used to assess learning of nonword orthography. Children showed robust learning for novel spelling patterns after incidental exposure to orthography. Further, we observed stronger learning for nonword-referent pairings trained with orthography. The degree of orthographic facilitation observed in posttests was related to children's reading levels, with more advanced readers showing more benefit from the presence of orthography.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Allerup, P., & Elbro, C. (1998). Comparing differences in accuracy across conditions or individuals: An argument for the use of log odds. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 409- 424.
    • Bates, T. C., Castles, A., Coltheart, M., Gillespie, N., Wright, M., & Martin, N. G. (2004). Behaviour genetic analyses of reading and spelling: A component processes approach. Australian Journal of Psychology, 56, 115-126.
    • Beck, I., McKeown, M., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York: Guildford Press.
    • Bowers, J., Davis, C., & Hanley, D. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? Journal of Memory and Language, 52(1), 131-143.
    • Bowey, J. A., & Miller, R. (2007). Correlates of orthographic learning in third-grade children's silent reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 115-128.
    • Burt, J. S. (2006). What is orthographic processing skill and how does it relate to word identification in reading? Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 400-417.
    • Burt, J. S., & Blackwell, P. (2008). Sound-spelling consistency in adults' orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 77-96.
    • Caravolas, M., Kessler, B., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Effects of orthographic consistency, frequency, and letter knowledge on children's vowel spelling development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 307-321.
    • Castles, A., Holmes, V., Neath, J., & Kinoshita, S. (2003). How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology, 56, 445-467.
    • Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., & Kl├╝ppel, D. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • WT

Cite this article