OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wang, Jiayi; Spencer-Oatey, Helen
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HM, T100
Given the small number of existing studies of face in intercultural settings and the increasing attention given to participant perspectives in face research, this paper explores the gains and losses of face as perceived by Chinese government officials during a three-week delegation visit to the United States of America. These perspectives were obtained from the group's spontaneous discussions during regular evening meetings when they reflected on the day's events. Several key features emerged from the discussions. Firstly, face enhancement was a primary goal for the visit – enhancement of their own face as a delegation, of the face of the Ministry they belonged to, as well as the face of their American hosts. Secondly, the delegates attempted to manage these face goals strategically. Thirdly, they spoke of face as a volatile image that could rise and fall sharply and yet endured across incidents, days and weeks. The paper reports on and discusses these participant perspectives in the light of recent theorizing on face.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Gao, Ge, 2009. Face and self in Chinese communication. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Haugh, M. (Eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. Equinox, London, pp. 175- 191.
    • Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar (2013) Face, identity, and im/politeness: Looking backwards, moving forward-from Goffman to Practice Theory. Journal of Politeness Research, 9, 1-33.
    • Goffman, Erving, 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday, New York.
    • Goffman, Erving, 1967. On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. In: Goffman, E., Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Doubleday, New York, pp. 5-45.
    • Grainger, Karen, Mills, Sara, Sibanda, Mandla, 2010. “Just tell us what to do”: Southern African face and its relevance to intercultural communication. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8), 2158-2171.
    • Hammersley, Martyn, Atkinson, Paul, 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice (3rd ed.). Routledge, London.
    • Haugh, Michael, 2009. Face and interaction. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Haugh, M. (Eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. Equinox, London, pp. 1-30.
    • Haugh, Michael, 2010. Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8), 2106-2119.
    • Haugh, Michael, 2012. Epilogue: the first-second order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1), 111-134.
    • Haugh, Michael, 2013. Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics 1 (1), 46-73.
    • Haugh, Michael, Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca, 2010. Face in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8), 2073-2077.
    • Haugh, Michael, Hinze, Carl, 2003. A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of 'face' and 'politeness' in Chinese, English and Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (10-11), 1581-1611.
    • Haugh, Michael, Watanabe, Yasuhisa, 2009. Analysing Japanese 'face-in-interaction': insights from intercultural business meetings. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Haugh, M. (Eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. Equinox, London, pp. 78-95.
    • He, Ming, Zhang, Shao-jie, 2011. Re-conceptualizing the Chinese concept of face from a facesensitive perspective: a case study of a modern Chinese TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (9), 2360-2372.
    • Hernández-Flores, Nieves, 2004. Politeness as face enhancement: an analysis of Spanish conversations between friends and family. In: Márquez-Reiter, R., Placencia, M. E. (Eds.), Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadephia, pp. 265-284.
    • Hernández-Flores, Nieves, 2008. Politeness and other types of facework: communicative and social meaning in a television panel discussion. Pragmatics 18 (4), 681-706.
    • Hinze, Carl, 2012. Chinese politeness is not about 'face': evidence from the business world. Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1), 11-27.
    • Ho, David, 1976. On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology 81, 867-884.
    • Ho, David, 1994. Face dynamics: from conceptualization to measurement. In: Ting-Toomey, S. (Ed.), The Challenge of Facework. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 269-286.
    • Hopf, Christel, 2004. Qualitative interviews: an overview. In: Flick, U., Kardorff, E. v., Steinke, I. (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research. Sage, London, pp. 203-208.
    • Hsun, Lu, 1960. On 'face'. In: Yang, H-y., Yang, G. (Trans. and eds.), Selected Stories of Lu Hsun, Foreign Language Press, Beijing, vol. 4, pp.129-132.
    • Hu, Hsien Chin, 1944. The Chinese concepts of "face". American Anthropologist 41 (1), 45- 54.
    • Kádár, Dániel, Haugh, Michael, 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Leech, Geoffrey, 1983. Principles of Pragmatics, Longman, London.
    • Li, Julie Juan, Su, Chentin, 2007. How face influences consumption. International Journal of Market Research 49 (2), 237-56.
    • Lim, Tae-Seop, 2009. Face in the holistic and relativistic society. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Haugh, M. (Eds.), Face, Communication and Social Interaction. Equinox, London, pp. 250-268.
    • Lin, Yutang, 1935. My Country and My people, Halcyon House, New York.
    • Morisaki, Seiichi, Gudykunst, William, B., 1994. Face in Japan and the United States. In: TingToomey, S. (Ed.), The Challenge of Facework. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, pp. 47-94.
    • Nida, Eugene, Taber, Charles, 1969. The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: Brill.
    • Nwoye, Onuigbo, G., 1992. Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face. Journal of Pragmatics 18 (4), 309-328.
    • Qian, Wang, Razzaque, Mohammed A., Kau, Ah-Keng, 2007. Chinese cultural values and giftgiving behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing 24 (4), 214-228.
    • Ruhi, Şükriye, Işık-Güler, Hale, 2007. Conceptualizing face and relational work in (im)politeness: revelations from politeness lexemes and idioms in Turkish. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4), 681-711.
    • Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1991. Reflections on talk and social structure. In: Boden, D., Zimmerman, D. H. (Eds.), Talk and Social Structure. Polity Press, Oxford, pp. 44-70.
    • Seligman, Scott D., 1999. Guanxi: grease for the wheels of China. China Business Review 26 (5), 34-38.
    • Sifianou, Maria, 2011. On the concept of face and politeness. In: Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Kádár, D.Z. (Eds.), Politeness across Cultures. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 42-58.
    • Sifianou, Maria, 2013. On culture, face and politeness. Again. Paper presented at the cc2013Face Communication across Cultures: Face and Interaction, University of Silesia, Sosnowiec, Poland.
    • Spencer-Oatey, Helen, 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4), 639-656.
    • Spencer-Oatey, Helen, 2008. Rapport Management: A framework for analysis. In: SpencerOatey, H. (Ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd ed.). Continuum, London, pp. 2-47.
    • Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Xing, Jianyu, 2003. Managing rapport in intercultural business interactions: a comparison of two Chinese-British business meetings. Journal of Intercultural Studies 24 (1), 33-46.
    • Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Xing, Jianyu, 2004. Rapport management problems in Chinese-British business interactions: a case study. In House, J., Rehbein, J. (Eds.), Multilingual Communication. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadephia, pp.197-222.
    • Spencer-Oatey, Helen, Xing, Jianyu, 2008. Issues of face in a Chinese business visit to Britain. In: Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory (2nd ed.), Continuum, London, pp. 258-273.
    • St. André, James, 2013. How the Chinese lost 'face'. Journal of Pragmatics 55, 68-85.
    • Terkourafi, Marina. Toward a universal notion of face for a universal notion of co-operation. In: Kecskes, I., Horn, L. (Eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 313-344.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok