Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Peña-Mora, F; Aziz, ZUH; Chen, A; Plans, A; Foltz, S
Publisher: ICE
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: built_and_human_env
During disaster response and recovery operations,\ud civil engineers can be assigned a multitude of tasks\ud including triage of building search priorities, identifi cation\ud and evaluation of structural hazards, as well as the\ud development of appropriate structural hazard mitigation\ud techniques and monitoring of hazards, while coordinating\ud and reporting this information to the incident command\ud centre (ICC). This paper reviews the role of civil\ud engineers in disaster response with a focus on existing\ud building assessment and marking systems and highlights\ud various limitations of existing approaches. A mobile\ud information technology (IT)-based collaborative\ud framework is discussed to facilitate a coordinated\ud disaster response and recovery operation. It enables\ud engineers to assess building damage better and to make\ud this information available to personnel more quickly and\ud easily within the disaster area and thereby improve\ud disaster response. The deployed architecture is composed\ud of various components including radio frequency\ud identifi cation (RFID)-based structural assessment, a field\ud engineer’s mobility and information support platform\ud and geographic information systems (GIS)-based\ud resource optimisation. Deployed infrastructure enables\ud the on-site and on-demand information provisioning,\ud data processing and computational support required by\ud engineers in the aftermath of a disaster.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. HAMMOND D. Engineering the collapse: making the structure safe. Fire Engineering, 1995, 148, No. 11, 49-63.
    • 2. THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATIONS. SEERPlan Manual. Structural Emergency Response Plan. NCSEA, Chicago, Illinois, 2003.
    • 3. W ALDUNATE R., PEÑA-MORA F., NUSSBAUM M. and OCHOA S. Robust Mobile Ad Hoc Space for Collaboration to Support Disaster Relief Efforts Involving Critical Physical Infrastructure, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Virginia. 2006, 20, No. 1, 13-27.
    • 4. DOMEL A. World Trade Center Disaster: Structural Engineers At Ground Zero. National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, 2001. See http://www.ncsea.com/ downloads/wtcseerp.pdf for further details (accessed 14 May 2008).
    • 5. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. SEE http://www.fema. gov/pdf/emergency/usr/usr_fog_sept_25_2003_color_final. pdf for further details.
    • 6. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY USAR RESCUE STRUCTURES SPECIALIST/US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. Urban Search and Rescue Structures Specialist Field Operations Guide, 4th edn. US Army Corps of Engineers, 2005.
    • 7. PEÑA-MORA F., CHEN A. Y., AZIZ Z., SOIBELMAN L., LIU L. Y., EL-RAYES K., ARBOLEDA C. A., LANTZ JR T. S., PLANS A. P., LAKHERA S and MATHUR S. A mobile ad-hoc network enabled collaborative framework supporting civil engineering emergency response. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2008 (under review).
    • 8. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY. Newsphoto. See http://www.photolibrary.fema.gov for further details.
    • 9. INTERNATIONAL SEARCH AND RESCUE RESPONSE. INSAR: Guidelines. Office for the Co.ordination of Humanitarian Affairs, INSAR Advisory Group. See http://www.reliefweb.int/undac/ documents/insarag/guidelines/Id-mark.html for further details (last accessed 28 August 2008).
    • 10. INTERNATIONAL SEARCH AND RESCUE ADVISORY GROUP. See http:// www.reliefweb.int/undac/documents/insarag/guidelines/ topics.html for further details.
    • 11. VORALBERG. See http://www.vorarlberg.at/jpg/ kennzeichnungnachinsarag_.jpg for further details.
    • 12. APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL. ATC-45 Field Manual: Safety Evaluation of Buildings after Wind Storms and Floods. Applied Technology Council, California. See http://www. atcouncil.org/ATC45.shtml for further details (last accessed 28 August 2008).
    • 13. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK. World Trade Center Emergency Damage Assessment of Buildings. SEAoNY-Guy Nordenson and Associates, New York, 2003.
    • 14. APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL. Users Manual: Mobile PostEarthquake Building Safety Evaluation Data Acquisition System. Applied Technology Council, California, 2003. See http://www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/ATC20i.pdf for further details (last accessed 28 August 2008).
    • 15. SAITO K., SPENCE R. and FOLEY T. Visual damage assessment using high-resolution satellite images following the 2003 Bam, Iran, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 2005, 21, No. S1, S309-S318.
    • 16. MATSUOKA M. and YAMAZAKI F. Use of satellite SAR intensity imagery for detecting building areas damaged due to earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 2004, 20, No. 3, 975-994.
    • 17. SEXTOS A., KAPPOS A. J. and STYLIANIDIS K. A. Computer-aided pre and post earthquake assessment of buildings involving database compilation, GIS visualization and mobile data transmission. Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2008, 23, No. 1, 59-73.
    • 18. EARTHDATA. See http://www.earthdata.com/p-cbre.html for further details.
    • 19. REHOR M. Classification of building damages based on laser scanning data. Proceedings of ISPRS Workshop on Laser Scanning and SilviLaser, Espoo, Finland, 12-14 September 2007.
    • 20. BEHZADAN A. H., AZIZ Z., ANUMBA C. and KAMAT V. R. Ubiquitous location tracking for context specific information delivery on construction sites. Automation in Construction, 2008, 17, No. 6, 737-748.
    • 21. EXPONENT. Wireless Building Monitoring System. 2008. See http://www.exponent.com/practices/techdev/wbms.html for further details (accessed 31/10/2008).
    • 22. INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS. Fire Fighters Doing Their Jobs and The Jobs Of Others. See http://www.iaff.org/ Comm/Katrina/Center0903Press.asp for further details.
    • 23. FOTHERGILL A. Knowledge transfer between researchers and practitioners. Natural Hazards Review, 2000, 1, No. 2, 91-98.
    • 24. NATIONAL ACADEMIC PRESS. Reducing Disaster Losses Through Better Information. NRC, Washington, DC, 1999.
    • 25. SAWYER S., TAPIA A., PESHECK L. and DAVENPORT J. Mobility and the first responder. Communications of the ACM, 2004, 47, No. 3, 62-65.
    • 26. MANSOURIAN A., RAJABIFARD A., VALADAN ZOEJ M. J and WILLIAMSON I. Using SDI and web-based system to facilitate disaster management. COM Computers and Geosciences, 32, No. 3, 303-315.
    • 27. KAMAT V. R. and EL-TAWIL S. Rapid post-disaster evaluation of building damage using augmented situational visualization. Proceedings of Construction Research Congress, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2005.
    • 28. WEGENER S. and DUNAGAN S. UAV Over-the-Horizon Disaster Management Demonstration Projects, White Paper. NASA Ames Research Center, California, 2000.
    • 29. TSAI M. H., LIU L., PEÑA-MORA F. and ARBOLEDA C. A preliminary design of disaster-survivable building black-box system for urban disaster response. Sensors in Construction and Infrastructure Management, Special Issue, 2008, 13, 179-192.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article