LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Osborne, Peter (2015)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Journal: Theory, Culture & Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: dialectical, transversality, humanities, transdisciplinarity, disciplinarity, generalization, philosophy, Articles, theory
This article situates current debates about transdisciplinarity within the deeper history of academic disciplinarity, in its difference from the notions of inter- and multi-disciplinarity. It offers a brief typology and history of established conceptions of transdisciplinarity within science and technology studies. It then goes on to raise the question of the conceptual structure of transdisciplinary generality in the humanities, with respect to the incorporation of the 19th- and 20th-century German and French philosophical traditions into the anglophone humanities, under the name of ‘theory’. It identifies two distinct – dialectical and anti-dialectical, or dialectical and transversal – transdisciplinary trajectories. It locates the various contributions to the special issue of which it is the introduction within this conceptual field, drawing attention to the distinct contribution of the French debates about structuralism and its aftermath – those by Serres, Foucault, Derrida, Guattari and Latour, in particular. It concludes with an appendix on Foucault’s place within current debates about disciplinarity and academic disciplines.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abbott A (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Adorno TW (1973 [1966]) Negative Dialectics, trans. Ashton EB. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    • Alliez E (2011) Rhizome (with no return): From structure to rhizome: Transdisciplinarity in French thought (2). Radical Philosophy 167: 36-42.
    • Alliez E (2015) Structuralism's afters: Tracing transdisciplinarity through Guattari and Latour. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 139-158.
    • Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A and Michaud G (eds) (1972) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Paris: OECD.
    • Appaduri A (1996) Diversity and disciplinarity as cultural artifacts. In: Nelson C and Gaonkar DP (eds) Disciplinarity and Dissent in Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 23-36.
    • Bachelard G (2012 [1949]) Corrationalism and the problematic, trans. Tiles M. Radical Philosophy 173: 27-32.
    • Bal M (2002) Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    • Balibar E´ (2004) We, The People of Europe? Reflections on Transnational Citizenship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Balibar E´ (2015) Foucault's point of heresy: 'Quasi-transcendentals' and the transdisciplinary function of the episteme. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 45-77.
    • Balibar E´ , et al. (2011a) From structure to rhizome: Transdisciplinarity in French thought (1). Radical Philosophy 165: 17-40.
    • Balibar E´ , et al. (2011b) From structure to rhizome: Transdisciplinarity in French thought (2). Radical Philosophy 167: 15-42.
    • Ball JS (ed.) (1990) Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge. London: Routledge.
    • Balsiger PW (2004) Supradisciplinary research practice: History, objectives, rationale. Futures 36: 407-21.
    • Baraitser L (2015) Temporal drag: Transdisciplinarity and the 'case' of psychosocial studies. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 207-231.
    • Barry A and Born G (eds) (2013a) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Barry A and Born G (2013b) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the social and natural sciences. In: Barry and Born (eds) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1-56.
    • Becher T (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    • Biagioli M (2009) Postdisciplinary liaisons: Science studies and the humanities. Critical Inquiry 35(4): 816-833.
    • Brewer GD (1999) The challenges of interdisciplinarity. Policy Sciences 32: 327-337.
    • Bruce A, Lyall C, Tait J and Williams R (2004) Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the fifth framework programme. Futures 36: 457-70.
    • Castel R (1994) 'Problemization' as a mode of reading history, trans. Wissing P. In: Goldstein J (ed.) Foucault and the Writing of History. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 237-52.
    • Chandler J (2008) Foucault and disciplinary authority. In: Donovan S, et al. (eds) Authority Matters: Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Authorship. New York: Rodopi, pp. 47-63.
    • Chandler J (2009) Introduction: Doctrine, disciples, discourses, departments. Critical Inquiry 35(4): 729-46.
    • Chandler J and Davidson AI (eds) (2009) Special issue of Critical Inquiry 35(4): The Fate of Disciplines.
    • Clark W (2006) Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Cunningham D (2015) Logics of generalization: Derrida, grammatology and transdisciplinarity. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 79-107.
    • Cusset F (2008 [2003]) French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States, trans. Fort J. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Deleuze G (2004 [1967]) How do we recognize structuralism? In: Lapoujade D (ed.) Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953-1974), trans. Taormina M. New York: Semiotext(e), pp. 170-192.
    • Derrida J (1982 [1968]) The ends of man. In: Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass A. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 109-136.
    • Derrida J (2004 [1990]) Eyes of the University: Right to Philosophy 2, trans. Plug J et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    • Dosse F (2010) Gilles Deleuze and Fe´lix Guattari: Intersecting Lives, trans. Glassman D. New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Dubiel H (1985) Theory and Practice: Studies in the Development of Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Feyeraband P (1978a [1975]) Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.
    • Feyeraband P (1978b) Science in a Free Society. London: New Left Books.
    • Foucault M (1970 [1966]) The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock.
    • Foucault M (1972 [1969]) The Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. Sheridan Smith AM. London: Tavistock.
    • Foucault M (1977 [1975]) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan Smith AM. London: Penguin.
    • Foucault M (1981a [1971]) The order of discourse. In: Young R (ed.) Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralism Reader. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 51-78.
    • Foucault M (1981b) Sexuality and solitude. London Review of Books 3: 9, 21 (reprinted in Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984, Volume 1: Ethics, London: Penguin, pp. 175-84).
    • Foucault M (2000 [1984]) Polemics, politics and problematizations. In: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. Essential Works of Michel Foucault. New York: The New Press, pp. 111-19.
    • Frodeman R, Klein JT and Mitcham K (eds) (2010) The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Frank R (1988) Interdisciplinarity: The first half-century. In: Stanley EG and Hoad TF (eds) Words. Cambridge: Brewer, pp. 91-102.
    • Funtowicz SO and Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7): 739-55.
    • Funtowicz SO and Ravetz JR (2003) Post-normal science. Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics. Available at: http://isecoeco.org/pdf/pstnormsc.pdf (accessed 23 June 2015).
    • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, et al. (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE.
    • Goffey A (2015) Introduction to Guattari on trandisciplinarity. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 125-130.
    • Goldstein J (1984) Foucault amongst sociologists: The 'disciplines' and the professions. History and Theory 23(2): 170-92.
    • Graham L, Lepenies W and Weingart P (eds) (1983) Functions and Uses of Disciplinary Histories. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
    • Hacking I (2004) The complacent disciplinarian. Available at: https://apps.lis. illinois.edu/wiki/download/attachments/2656520/Hacking.complacent.pdf (accessed 23 June 2015).
    • Hall S (1990) The emergence of cultural studies and the crisis of the humanities. October 53: 11-23.
    • Hall S, Osborne P and Segal L (1997) Culture and power: An interview with Stuart Hall. Radical Philosophy 86: 24-41.
    • Hessels LK and van Lente H (2008) Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy 37: 740-60.
    • Hirsch Hadorn G, et al. (2008a) Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Vienna: Springer.
    • Hirsch Hadorn G, et al. (2008b) The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, et al. (eds) Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Vienna: Springer, pp. 19-39.
    • Horkheimer M (1993 [1931]) The present situation of social philosophy and the tasks of an Institute of Social Research. In: Between Philosophy and Social Science: Selected Early Writings, trans. Hunter GF et al. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Hunt L (1994) The virtues of disciplinarity. Eighteenth-Century Studies 28: 1-7.
    • Jahn T, Bergmann M and Keil F (2012) Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Economics 79: 1-10.
    • Jantsch E (1970) Inter- and transdisciplinary university: A systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sciences 1: 403-28.
    • Jantsch E (1972) Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In: Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A and Michaud G (eds) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Paris: OECD, pp. 97-121.
    • Kant I (1979 [1798]) The Conflict of the Faculties, trans. Gregor MJ. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska University Press.
    • Kant I (1996 [1784]) An answer to the question: 'What is Enlightenment?' In: Kant I (ed.) Practical Philosophy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-22.
    • Kelley DR (ed.) (1997) History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
    • Kim Y (ed.) (1998) Transdisciplinarity: 'Stimulating Synergies, Integrating Knowledges'. Paris: UNESCO.
    • Kockelmans JJ (ed.) (1979) Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvannia Press.
    • Ko¨ tter R and Balsiger PW (1999) Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity: A constant challenge to the sciences. Issues in Integrative Studies 17: 87-119.
    • Lakatos I and Musgrave A (eds) (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to ActorNetwork-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Latour B (2013) An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns, trans. Porter C. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Lawrence RJ and Despre´ s C (2004) Introduction: Futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures 36: 397-405.
    • Lichnerowicz A (1972) Mathematic and transdisciplinarity. In: Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A and Michaud G (eds) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Paris: OECD, pp. 121-7.
    • Maniglier P (2012a) Problem-sharing: The role of problems in transdisciplinarity from the standpoint of the French epistemological tradition. Paper presented to the workshop 'From Science and Technology Studies to the Humanities: The State of the Field and the Concept of “Problem”', Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy, Kingston University London, 26 January.
    • Maniglier P (2012b) What is a problematic?. Radical Philosophy 173: 21-23.
    • Maniglier P (2014) A metaphysical turn? Bruno Latour's An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Radical Philosophy 187: 37-44.
    • Marx K and Engels F (1970) The German Ideology (1845-6), ed. Arthur C. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    • Mercier L (2015) Introduction to Serres on trandisciplinarity. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 37-40.
    • Messer-Davidow E, Shumway DR and Sylvan DJ (eds) (1993) Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
    • Mitchell WJT (1995) Interdisciplinarity and visual culture. Art Bulletin 77: 540-44.
    • Mitchell WJT (2009) Art, fate, and the disciplines: Some indicators. Critical Inquiry 35(4): 1023-1031.
    • Mittelstrass J (2011) On transdisciplinarity. Trames 15(4): 329-38.
    • Mobjo¨ rk M (2010) Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: A refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42: 866-73.
    • Mowitt J (1992) Text: The Genealogy of an Anti-Disciplinary Object. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    • Nelson C and Gaonkar DP (eds) (1996a) Disciplinarity and Dissent in Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.
    • Nelson C and Gaonkar DP (1996b) Cultural studies and the politics of disciplinarity: An introduction. In: Nelson C and Gaonkar DP (eds) Disciplinarity and Dissent in Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 1-19.
    • Nicolescu B (2002 [1996]) Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, trans. Voss K-C. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    • Nicolescu B (ed.) (2008) Transdisciplinarity - Theory and Practice. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    • Nowotny H (2003) The potential of transdisciplinarity. Available at: http:// www.helga-nowotny.eu/downloads/helga_nowotny_b59.pdf (accessed 23 June 2015).
    • Nowotny H, Scott P and Gibbons M (2001) Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    • October (1990) Issue 53. Special Issue on The Humanities as Social Technology.
    • Osborne P (2000) Philosophy in cultural theory. In: Philosophy in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 1-19.
    • Osborne P (2009) Hegemonic, inter-, anti- and trans-disciplinarities. Paper presented to the Conference of the Network of Editors of Interdisciplinary Journals, 'Interdisciplinarity in the Arts and Humanities: Research, Policy, Publishing', London, 20 March. Unpublished.
    • Osborne P (2011a) Introduction: From structure to rhizome: Transdisciplinarity in French thought (1). Radical Philosophy 165: 15-16.
    • Osborne P (2011b) Philosophy after theory: Transdisciplinarity and the new. In: Elliott J and Attridge D (eds) Theory After 'Theory'. London: Routledge, pp. 19-33.
    • Osborne P and Alliez A (2013) Introduction. In: Osborne P and Alliez A (eds) Spheres of Action: Art and Politics. London: Tate Publishing, pp. 7-17.
    • Piaget J (1972) The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships. In: Apostel L, Berger G, Briggs A and Michaud G (eds) Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Paris: OECD, pp. 127-39.
    • Pickering A (1993) Antidisciplines or narratives of illusion. In: Messer-Davidow E, Shumway DR and Sylvan DJ (eds) Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, pp. 103-23.
    • Pickering A (2013) Ontology and antidisciplinarity. In: Barry A and Born G (eds) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 209-25.
    • Pohl C and Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research: Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Munich: oekom Verlag.
    • Power N (2015) Reading transdisciplinarily: Sartre and Althusser. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 109-124.
    • Prost R (2009) Debating disciplinarity. Critical Inquiry 35(4): 749-770.
    • Pulkkinen T (2015) Identity and intervention: Disciplinarity as transdisciplinarity in gender studies. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 183-205.
    • Reese TF (1995) Mapping interdisciplinarity. Art Bulletin 77: 544-549.
    • Russell AW, Wickson F and Carew AL (2008) Transdisciplinarity: Context, contradictions and capacity. Futures 40: 460-472.
    • Sandford S (2015) Contradiction of terms: Feminist theory, philosophy and transdisciplinarity. Theory, Culture & Society 32(5-6): 159-182.
    • Schaffer S (2013) How disciplines look. In: Barry and Born (eds) Interdisciplinarity: Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 57-81.
    • Schwartz M (1998) Critical reproblemization: Foucault and the task of modern philosophy. Radical Philosophy 91: 19-29.
    • Shumway DR and Messer-Davidow E (1991) Disciplinarity: An introduction. Poetics Today 12(2): 201-225.
    • Slaughter S and Leslie LL (1997) Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Somerville M and Rapport D (eds) (2000) Transdisciplinarity: Recreating Integrated Knowledge. Oxford: EOLSS.
    • Sperber D, Nowotny H, et al. (2003-4) Rethinking interdisciplinarity. Available at: http://www.interdisciplines.org/medias/confs/archives/archive_3.pdf
    • Spivak GC (2003) Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Stills DL (1986) A note on the origin of 'interdisciplinary'. Item 40(1): 17-18.
    • Strathern M (2004) Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge. Wantage: Sean Kingston.
    • Taka´ cs A (2004) Between theory and history: On interdisciplinary practice in Michael Foucault's work. MLN 119: 869-884.
    • Thompson Klein J (2004) Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 36: 515-526.
    • Thompson Klein J (2005) Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity: The Changing American Academy. Albany: SUNY Press.
    • Thompson Klein J et al. (eds)(2001) Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society: An Effective Way of Managing Complexity. Basel: Birkh a¨user.
    • Valenza R (2009) Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciples in Britain, 1680-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Wallerstein I (1996) Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commision on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    • Wallerstein I (2004) Dilemmas of the disciplines. In: The Uncertainties of Knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 109-90.
    • Wellbery DE (2009) The general enters the library: A note on disciplines and complexity. Critical Inquiry 35(4): 982-96.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article