LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Giglioni, Guido (2008)
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: PHI, CLL, CLA
This article investigates the reasons behind the disappearance of Francis Glisson’s theory of irritability during the eighteenth century. At a time when natural investigations were becoming increasingly polarized between mind and matter in the attempt to save both man’s consciousness and the inert nature of the res extensa, Glisson’s notion of a natural perception embedded in matter did not satisfy the new science’s basic injunction not to superimpose perceptions and appetites on nature. Knowledge of nature could not be based on knowledge within nature, i.e., on the very knowledge that nature has of itself; or – to look at the same question from the point of view of the human mind – man’s consciousness could not be seen as participating in forms of natural selfhood. Albrecht Haller played a key role in this story. Through his experiments, Haller thought he had conclusively demonstrated that the response given by nature when irritated did not betray any natural perceptivity, any inner life, any sentiment interi´eur. In doing so, he provided a less bewildering theory of irritability for the rising communities of experimental physiology.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Boerhaave, Herman. 1740. Institutions de medicine. Translated by Julian Offray de la Mettrie. Paris: Huart and Briasson.
    • Bordeu, The´ophile de. 1818. Œuvres comple`tes. Paris: Caille et Ravier.
    • Boury, Dominique. 2004. La philosophie me´dicale de The´ophile de Bordeu. Paris: Honore´ Champion.
    • Bouveresse, Rene´e. 1992. L'ide´e d'animisme universel chez Spinoza et Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.
    • Campanella, Tommaso. 1620. De sensu rerum et magia. Edited by Tobias Adami. Frankfurt: Egenolph Emmel and Gottfried Tampach.
    • Canguilhem, Georges. 1977. La formation du concept de reflexe aux XVIIe et XVIIIe sie`cles. Paris: Vrin.
    • Cardoso, Adelino. 2008. Vida e Percep¸ca˜o de Si: Figuras da Subjectividade do Se´culo XVII. Lisboa: Edic¸o˜ es Colibri.
    • Cook, Harold. 2000. “Boerhaave and the Flight from Reason in Medicine.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 74:221-240.
    • Cudworth, Ralph. [1845] 1995. The True Intellectual System of the Universe. London: Tegg (reprint: Bristol: Thoemmes).
    • Cunningham, Andrew. 1990. “Medicine to Calm the Mind: Boerhaave's Medical System and Why It Was Adopted in Edinburgh.” In The Medical Enlightenment of the Eighteenth Century, edited by Andrew Cunningham and Roger French, 40-66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Des Chene, Dennis. 2001. Spirits and Clocks: Machine and Organism in Descartes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    • Douglas, Aileen. 1995. Uneasy Sensations: Smollett and the Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Duchesneau, Franc¸ois. 1982. La Physiologie des Lumie`res: Empirisme, mode`les, et the´ories. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
    • Duchesneau, Franc¸ois. 1998. Les mode`les du vivant de Descartes a` Leibniz. Paris: Vrin.
    • French, Roger Kenneth. 1969. Robert Whytt, the Soul, and Medicine. London: Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine.
    • French, Roger Kenneth. 1994. William Harvey's Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Frixione, Eugenio. 2007. “Irritable Glue: The Haller-Whytt Controversy on the Mechanism of Muscle Contraction.” In Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays on Eighteenth-Century Medicine, edited by Harry Whitaker, Christopher Upham,Murray Smith and Stanley Finger, 115-124. New York: Springer.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 1995a. “Automata Compared: Boyle, Leibniz and the Debate on the Notion of Life and Mind.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 3:249-278.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 1995b. “Panpsychism versus Hylozoism: An Interpretation of Some SeventeenthCentury Doctrines of Universal Animation.” Acta Comeniana 11:25-45.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 1996a. “Anatomist Atheist? The 'Hylozoistic' Foundations of Francis Glisson's Anatomical Research.” In Religio Medici: Medicine and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England, edited by Ole Peter Grell and Andrew Cunningham, 115-135. Aldershot: Scolar Press.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 1996b. “Campanella e Glisson. Motivi ilozoistici nella medicina inglese della seconda meta` del Seicento.” Bruniana & Campanelliana 2:237-245.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 2000a. Immaginazione e malattia. Saggio su Jan Baptiste van Helmont. Milan: Angeli.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 2000b. “The Language of Imagination in Jan Baptiste van Helmont and Francis Glisson.” In Medical Latin: From the Late Middle Ages to the Eighteenth Century, edited by Wouter Bracke and Herwig Deumens, 175-196. Brussels: Koninklijke Academie voor Geneeskunde van Belgie¨.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 2002a. The Genesis of Francis Glisson's Philosophy of Life. Ph.D. diss., Johns Hopkins University.
    • Giglioni, Guido. 2002b. “Francis Glisson's Notion of Confoederatio Naturae in the Context of Hylozoistic Corpuscularianism.” Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 55:239-262.
    • Glisson, Francis. [1650] 1682. De rachitide . . . Editio postrema. Den Haag: Arnold Leer.
    • Glisson, Francis. 1672. De natura substantiae energetica. London: Flesher.
    • Glisson, Francis. 1677. Tractatus de ventriculo et intestinis. Amsterdam: Jacobus Junior.
    • Glisson, Francis. 1996. De inadaequatis rerum conceptibus. In Latin Manuscripts of Francis Glisson (1). Philosophical Papers, edited by Guido Giglioni. Cambridge: Cambridge Wellcome Unit.
    • Gueroult, Martial. 1968. Spinoza. Hildesheim: Olms.
    • Guerrini, Anita. 2003. Experimenting with Humans and Animals: From Galen to Animal Rights. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Haller, Albrecht von. [1755] 1936. A Dissertation on the Sensible and Irritable Parts of Animals, introduction by Owsei Temkin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    • Haller, Albrecht von. 1757-1766. Elementa physiologiae corporis humani, 8 vols. Bern and Lausanne: Bousquet, D'Arnay, Grasset.
    • Haller, Albrecht von. 1776-1777a. “Irritabilite´.” In Supple´ment a` l'Encyclope´die, III. Amsterdam: Rey.
    • Haller, Albrecht von. 1776-1777b. “Sensibilite´.” In Supple´ment a` l'Encyclope´die, IV. Amsterdam: Rey.
    • Haller, Albrecht von. [1786] 1966. First Lines of Physiology. New York: Johnson Reprint.
    • Hartbecke, Karin. 2005. “Natur und Selbstbewegung. Die Umdeutung des galenistischen Naturbegriffs durch den Anatomen Francis Glisson.” In Der Naturbegriff in der Fru¨hen Neuzeit. Semantischen Perspektiven zwischen 1500 und 1700, edited by Thomas Leinkauf and Karin Hartbecke, 283-298. Tu¨ bingen: Niemeyer.
    • Hartbecke, Karin. 2006. Metaphysik und Naturphilosophie im 17. Jahrhundert. Francis Glissons Substanztheorie in ihrem ideengeschichtlichen Kontext. Tu¨ bingen: Niemeyer.
    • Heller-Roazen, Daniel. 2007. The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation. New York: Zone Books.
    • Henry, John. 1987. “Medicine and Pneumatology: Henry More, Richard Baxter, and Francis Glisson's Treatise On the Energetic Nature of Substance.” Medical History 31:15-40.
    • Israel, Jonathan. 2007. “Enlightenment, Radical Enlightenment and the 'Medical Revolution' of the Late Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries.” In Medicine and Religion in Enlightenment Europe, edited by Ole Peter Grell and Andrew Cunningham, 5-28. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • Knoeff, Rina. 2002. Herman Boerhaave (1668-1738): Calvinist Chemist and Physician. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.
    • Koeler, Peter. 2007. “Neuroscience in the Work of Boerhaave and Haller.” In Brain, Mind and Medicine: Essays on Eighteenth-Century Medicine, edited by Harry Whitaker, Christopher Upham Murray Smith and Stanley Finger, 213-232. New York: Springer.
    • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. [1875-1899] 1960-1961. Philosophischen Schriften, edited by C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmann (reprint: Hildesheim: Olms).
    • Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. 1923-. Sa¨mtliche Schriften und Briefe. Darmstadt, Leipzig and Berlin.
    • Lesky, Erna. 1959. “Albrecht von Haller und Anton de Haen im Streit um die Lehre von der Sensibilita¨t.” Gesnerus 16:16-46.
    • Lindeboom, Gerrit Arie. 1968. Herman Boerhaave: The Man and His Work. London: Methuen.
    • Mo¨ ller, Hans-Jurgen. 1975. Die Begriffe “Reizbarkeit” and “Reiz”: Konstanz und Wandel ihres Bedeutungsgehaltes sowie Problematik ihrer exakten Definition. Stuttgart: Fischer.
    • Monti, Maria Teresa. 1990. Congettura ed esperienza nella fisiologia di Haller. La riforma dell'anatomia animata e il sistema della generazione. Florence: Olschki.
    • Monti, Maria Teresa. 1997. “Les dynamismes du corps et les forces du vivant dans la physiologie de Haller.” In Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory, edited by Guido Cimino and Franc¸ois Duchesneau, 41-66. Florence: Olschki.
    • More, Henry. 1679. Ad V. C. epistola altera. In Opera omnia, II, i, 608-609. London: Maycock.
    • Pacchi, Arrigo. 1973. Cartesio in Inghilterra. Rome and Bari: Laterza.
    • Pagel, Walter. 1967. “Harvey and Glisson on Irritability, with a Note on Van Helmont.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 41:497-514.
    • Rees, Graham. 1984. “Francis Bacon and spiritus vitalis.” In Spiritus: IV Colloquio Internazionale del Lessico Intellettuale Europeo, edited by Marta Fattori and Massimo Bianchi, 265-281. Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo.
    • Rees, Graham. 1996. “Introduction.” In Francis Bacon, Philosophical Studies c. 1611-c. 1619, edited with introduction, notes, and commentaries by Graham Rees, translated by Graham Rees and Michael Edwards, xxxvi-lxix. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Rey, Roselyne. 2000. Naissance et de´veloppement du vitalisme en France de la deuxie`me moitie´ du 18e sie`cle a` la fin du Premier Empire. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.
    • Roe, Shirley A. 1981. Matter, Life, and Generation: Eighteenth-Century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Roe, Shirley A. 1984. “Anatomia animata. The Newtonian Physiology of Albrecht von Haller.” In Transformation and Tradition in the Sciences. Essays in Honor of I. Bernard Cohen, edited by Everett Mendelsohn, 273-300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rudolph, Gerhard. 1964. “Hallers Lehre von der Irritabilita¨t und Sensibilita¨t.” In Von Boerhaave bis Berger, edited by Karl E. Rothschuh, 14-34. Stuttgart: Fischer.
    • Schofield, Robert E. 1970. Mechanism and Materialism. British Natural Philosophy in an Age of Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Sonntag, Otto. 1974. “The Motivations of the Scientist: The Self-Image of Albrecht von Haller.” Isis 65:336-351.
    • Sonntag, Otto. 1983. Correspondence between Haller and Bonnet. Bern, Stuttgart and Vienna: Huber.
    • Starobinski, Jean. 2003. Action and Reaction: The Life and Adventures of a Couple. New York: Zone Books.
    • Steinke, Hubert. 2005. Irritating Experiments: Haller's Concept and the European Controversy on Irritability and Sensibility, 1750-90. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
    • Temkin, Owsei. 1964. “The Classical Roots of Glisson's Doctrine of Irritation.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38:297-328.
    • Thomson, Ann. 1991. “La Mettrie, lecteur et traducteur de Boerhaave.” In Dix-huitie`me Sie`cle, special issue: Physiologie et me´decine, edited by Mirko D. Grmek and Roselyne Rey, 23-29. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
    • Toellner, Richard. 1967. “Anima et Irritabilitas. Hallers Abwehr von Animismus und Materialismus.” Sudhoffs Archiv 51:130-144.
    • Toellner, Richard. 1973. “Haller und Leibniz. Zwei Universalgelehrte der Aufkla¨rung.” In Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa), I, 249-260. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
    • Toellner, Richard. 1997. “Principles and Forces of Life in Haller.” In Vitalisms from Haller to the Cell Theory, edited by Guido Cimino and Franc¸ois Duchesneau, 31-39. Florence: Olschki.
    • Walker, Daniel Pickering. 1972. “Francis Bacon and Spiritus .” In Science, Medicine and Society in the Renaissance: Essays to Honor Walter Pagel, edited by Allen G. Debus, II, 121-130. London: Heinemann.
    • Wellman, Kathleen. 1992. La Mettrie: Medicine, Philosophy, and Enlightenment. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
    • Yolton, John W. 1984. Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Yolton, John W. 1991. Locke and French Materialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    • Zac, Sylvain. 1963. L'ide´e de vie dans la philosophie de Spinoza. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article