Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Coupaud, S.; McLean, A.N.; Allan, D.B. (2009)
Publisher: Springer
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: T1, R1

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: musculoskeletal diseases, musculoskeletal system
Objective: Disuse osteoporosis is a major long-term health consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI) that still needs to be addressed. Its management in SCI should begin with accurate diagnosis, followed by targeted treatments in the most vulnerable subgroups. We present data quantifying disuse osteoporosis in a cross-section of the Scottish paraplegic population to identify subgroups with lowest bone mineral density (BMD).\ud Materials and Methods: Forty-seven people with chronic SCI at levels T2-L2 were scanned using peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) at four tibial sites and two femoral sites, at the Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Glasgow (U.K.). At the distal epiphyses, trabecular BMD (BMDtrab), total BMD, total bone cross-sectional area (CSA), and bone mineral content (BMC) were determined. In the diaphyses, cortical BMD, total bone CSA, cortical CSA, and BMC were calculated. Bone, muscle and fat CSAs were estimated in the lower leg and thigh.\ud Results: BMDtrab decreased exponentially with time since injury, at different rates in the tibia and femur. At most sites, female paraplegics had significantly lower BMC, total bone CSA and muscle CSA than male paraplegics. Subjects with lumbar SCI tended to have lower bone values and smaller muscle CSAs than in thoracic SCI. \ud Conclusion: At the distal epiphyses of the tibia and femur, there is generally a rapid and extensive reduction in BMDtrab after SCI. Female subjects, and those with lumbar SCI, tend to have lower bone values than males or those with thoracic SCI, respectively.\ud Keywords: Bone loss, osteoporosis, paraplegia, peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography, spinal cord injury
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Chen B and Stein A. Osteoporosis in acute spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2003; 9(1): 26-35.
    • Clin Endocrin 2006; 65: 555-565.
    • Frey-Rindova P, de Bruin E, Stüssi E, Dambacher M and Dietz V. Bone mineral density in upper and lower extremities during 12 months after spinal cord injury measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Spinal Cord 2000; 38: 26-32.
    • Relationship between the duration of paralysis and bone structure: a pQCT study of spinal cord injured individuals. Bone 2004; 34(5): 869-880.
    • Freehafer AA. Limb fractures in patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 823-827.
    • Vestergaard P, Krogh K, Rejnmark L and Mosekilde L. Fracture rates and risk factors for fractures in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 1998; 36: 790-796.
    • Eser P, Frotzler A, Zehnder Y and Denoth J. Fracture threshold in the femur and tibia of people with spinal cord injury as determined by peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 498-504.
    • Giangregorio L, McCartney N. Bone loss and muscle atrophy in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, fracture prediction, and rehabilitation strategies. J Spinal Cord Med 2006; 29: 489-500.
    • Increased bone mineral density after prolonged electrically induced cycle training of paralyzed limbs in spinal cord injured man. Calcified Tissue Int 1997; 61: 22-25.
    • [10] de Bruin ED, Frey-Rindova P, Herzog RE, Dietz V, Dambacher MA and Stüssi E (1999) Changes of tibia bone properties after spinal cord injury: effects of early intervention. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 214-220.
    • [11] Bélanger M, Stein RB, Wheeler GD, Gordon T, Leduc B. Electrical stimulation: can it increase muscle strength and reverse osteopenia in spinal cord injured individuals? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1090-1098.
    • [12] Frotzler A, Coupaud S, Perret C, Kakebeeke TH, Hunt KJ, Donaldson N de N, Eser P. High-volume FES-cycling partially reverses bone loss in people with chronic spinal cord injury. Bone 2008; 43: 169-176.
    • [13] Dudley-Javoroski S, Shields RK. Muscle and bone plasticity after spinal cord injury: review of adaptations to disuse and to electrical stimulation. J Rehab Res Dev 2008; 45(2): 283-296.
    • [14] Bolotin HH. Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral densitometry may flaw osteopenic/osteoporotic interpretations and mislead assessment of antiresorptive therapy effectiveness. Bone 2001; 28(5): 548-555.
    • [15] Ferretti JL. Noninvasive assessment of bone architecture and biomechanical properties in animals and humans employing pQCT technology. J Jpn Soc Bone Morphom 1997; 7: 115-125.
    • [16] Eser P, Frotzler A, Zehnder Y, Schießl H and Denoth J. Assessment of anthropometric, systemic, and lifestyle factors influencing bone status in the legs of spinal cord injured individuals. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 26-34.
    • [17] Rittweger J, Beller G, Ehrig J, et al.. Bone-muscle strength indices for the human lower leg. Bone 2000; 27(2): 319-326.
    • [18] Frost HM. Perspectives: a proposed general model of the “Mechanostat” (suggestions from a new skeletal-biologic paradigm). The Anatomical Record 1996; 244:139-147.
    • [19] Maimoun L, Fattal C, Micallef J-P, Peruchon E and Rabischong. Bone loss in spinal cord-injured patients: from physiopathology to therapy. Spinal Cord 2006; 44: 203-210.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article