Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
O'Regan, Michael (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
This article, by exploring an approach to research, argues a case for bricolage as an acceptable approach in tourism research. Tourism researchers thinking about utilizing methodological bricolage as a research approach have little scholarly literature to draw from; therefore, it remains relatively underused and misunderstood as a means of qualitative inquiry. This article presents an account of getting to grips with a multiparadigmatic methodological bricolage as a way of understanding the world of backpacking and its inhabitants, who actively constitute, distinguish, and label themselves as backpackers. It is an approach that delivered a coherent conceptual scaffold, producing a rich, but always partial, understanding of a social world, those who inhabit it, and how they sustain it. It doing so, the research design adds to methodological innovation and diversification in tourism research.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society, 7(2), 295-310.
    • Ateljevic, I., & Doorne, S. (2005). Tourism as a performance: Enacting backpacker tourism in Fiji. In A. Jaworski & A. Pritchard (Eds.), Discourse, communication and tourism (pp. 173-198). Clevedon, UK: Channel View Publications.
    • Beck, U. (2000). What is globalization? Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    • Berdichevsky, L., Poria, Y., & Uriely, N. (2013). Sexual behavior in women's tourist experiences: Motivations, behaviors, and meanings. Tourism Management, 35, 144-155.
    • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bourdieu, P. (2004). Esquisse pour une auto-analyse. Paris: Éditions Raisons d'Agir.
    • Büscher, M., & Urry, J. (2009). Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 99-116.
    • Callon, M. (1999). Actor-network theory-The market test. In J. Hassard & J. Law (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 181-195). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
    • D'Andrea, A. (2006). Neo-nomadism: A theory of postidentitarian mobility in the global age. Mobilities, 1(1), 95-119.
    • Davidson, K. J. (1999). Traveller acts: A critical ethnography of backpacker India. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland.
    • de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: The University of Berkeley Press.
    • Deleuze, G. (1992). Societies of control. October, 59, 3-7.
    • Denzin, N. (2009). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
    • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and issues (pp. 1-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). London: Sage.
    • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
    • Edensor, T. (1998). Tourists at the Taj: Performance and meaning at a symbolic site. London: Routledge.
    • Franklin, A. (2003). Tourism: An introduction. London: Sage.
    • Galani-Moutafi, V. (2000). The self and the other: Traveler, ethnographer, tourist. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(1), 203-224.
    • Garfinkel, H. (1984). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. (Original publication 1967).
    • Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & S. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175-206). New York: Sage.
    • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    • Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
    • Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters. Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
    • Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
    • Grossberg, L. (1989). On the road with three ethnographers. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 13(2), 23-26.
    • Guthrie, C. (2007). On learning the research craft: Memoirs of a journeyman researcher. Journal of Research Practice, 3(1), Article M1.
    • Hammersley, M. (1999). Not bricolage but boatbuilding: Exploring two metaphors for thinking about ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28, 574-585.
    • Havitz, M., & Dimanche, F. (1997). Leisure involvement revisited: Conceptual conundrums and measurement advances. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(3), 245-278.
    • Hollinshead, K. (1999). Tourism as public culture: Horne's ideological commentary on the legerdemain of tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research, 1(4), 267-292.
    • Hollinshead, K. (2004). A primer in ontological craft: The creative capture of people and place through qualitative research. In J. Phillimore & L. Goodson (Eds.), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 63-82). London: Routledge.
    • Jensen, O. B. (2009). Foreword: Mobilities as culture. In P. Vannini (Ed.), The cultures of alternative mobilities: Routes less travelled (pp. 1-20). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
    • Johnson, D. P. (2008). Contemporary sociological theory: An integrated multi-level approach. New York: Springer.
    • Kincheloe J. L. (2001). Describing the bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 679-692.
    • Kincheloe, J. L. (2004). Critical pedagogy primer. New York/Oxford: Peter Lang.
    • Kincheloe, J. L. (2005). On to the next level: Continuing the conceptualization of the bricolage. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(3), 323-350.
    • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
    • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
    • Loker-Murphy, L. (1996). Backpackers in Australia: A motivation-based segmentation study. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 5(4), 23-45.
    • Lorimer, H. (2005). Cultural geography: The busyness of being 'more than representational.' Progress in Human Geography, 29(1), 83-94.
    • Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher, a sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Lozanski, K., & Beres, M. (2007). Temporary transience and qualitative research: Methodological lessons from fieldwork with independent travelers and seasonal workers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/back issues/6_2/lozanski.htm
    • Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • Marcus, G. A. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
    • McCormack, D. (2005). Diagramming practice and performance. Environment and Planning D, 23(1), 119-147.
    • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original publication Phenomenologie de la Perception, 1945)
    • Nietzsche, F. (1969). The genealogy of morals. New York: Random House.
    • Nóvoa,A. (2012). Musicians on the move: Mobilities and identities of a band on the road. Mobilities, 7(3), 349-368.
    • O'Gorman, K. D., MacLaren, A. C., & Bryce, D. (2012). A call for renewal in tourism ethnographic research: The researcher as both the subject and object of knowledge. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(1), 45-59.
    • Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups (Rev. Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • O'Regan, M. (2012). Alternative mobility cultures and the resurgence of hitchhiking. In S. Fullagar, K. Markwell, & E. Wilson (Eds.), Slow tourism: Experiences and mobilities (pp. 128-142). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
    • O'Reilly, C. C. (2006). From drifter to gap year tourist: Mainstreaming backpacker travel. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(4), 998-1017.
    • Pearce, P. L. (1988). The Ulysses factor: Evaluating visitors in tourist settings. New York: Springer-Verlag.
    • Relph, E. (1981). Phenomenology. In M. E. Harvey & B. P. Holly (Eds.), Themes in geographic thought (pp. 99-114). London: Croom Helm.
    • Richardson, L. (1993). Poetics, dramatics, and transgressive validity: The case of the skipped line. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(4), 695-710.
    • Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516-529). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Richardson, L. (1995). Narrative and sociology. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Representation in ethnography (pp. 198-221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Richardson, L. (2000). Evaluating ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(2), 253-255.
    • Richardson, M. (1980). Culture and the urban stage: The nexus of setting, behavior, and image in urban places. In I. Altman, A. Rapoport, & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research. Vol. 4: Environment and culture (pp. 209-241). New York: Plenum Press.
    • Riley, R. W., & Love, L. L. (2000). The state of qualitative tourism research. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(1), 164-187.
    • Rogers, M. (2012). Contextualizing theories and practices of bricolage research. The Qualitative Report, 17, 1-17.
    • Rüling, C., & Duymedjian, R. (2014). Digital bricolage: Resources and coordination in the production of digital visual effects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 83, 98-110.
    • Shanks, M., & Tilley, C. (1992). Re-constructing archaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207-226.
    • Sorensen, A. (2003). Backpacker ethnography. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(4), 847-867.
    • Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific Sociological Review, 25(2), 251-272.
    • Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 455-486).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Thrift, N. (1994). Inhuman geographies: Landscapes of speed, light and power. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Writing the rural: Five cultural geographies (pp. 191-250). London: Paul Chapman.
    • Tribe, J. (2006). The truth about tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 33, 360-381.
    • Unruh, D. R. (1980). The nature of social worlds. Pacific Sociological Review, 23(3), 271-296.
    • Uriely, N. (2009). Deconstructing tourist typologies: The case of backpacking. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(4), 306-312.
    • Van Egmond, T. (2007). Understanding Western tourists in developing countries. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI.
    • Wacquant, L. (2005). Symbolic power in the rule of the “state nobility.” In L. Wacquant (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu and democratic politics: The mystery of ministry (pp. 133-150). Cambridge, UK: Polity.
    • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article