Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Strhan, Anna (2010)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BL, L
This paper examines the recent shift towards the dominance of the study of philosophy of religion, ethics and critical thinking within religious education in Britain. It explores the impact of the critical realist model, advocated by Andrew Wright and Philip Barnes, in response to prior models of phenomenological religious education, in order to expose the ways in which both approaches can lead to a distorted understanding of religion. Although the writings of Emmanuel Levinas have been used in support of the critical realist model by Wright, here I consider how his and Slavoj Žižek’s writings on religion might challenge the dominance of the critical realist approach and provide a conceptual framework through which it might be possible to develop an alternative approach to religious education that attends to the complexity, ambiguity and demanding nature of engaging with religious traditions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Asad, T. (1993) Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press).
    • Badiou, A. (2001) Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, P. Hallward, trans.
    • Barnes, L. P. (2009) Religious Education: Taking Religious Difference Seriously, IMPACT, No. 17 (PESGB).
    • Beck, R. and D. Worden (2002) Truth, Spirituality and Contemporary Issues: GCSE Religious Studies for AQA (Oxford, Heinemann).
    • Copley, T. (2008) Teaching Religion: New Updated Edition (Exeter, University of Exeter Press).
    • Cox, J. L. (2006) A Guide to the Phenomenology of Religion: Key Figures, Formative Influences and Subsequent Debates (London and New York, Continuum).
    • Critchley, S. (2002) Introduction, in: S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Levinas (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), pp. 1- 32.
    • Jackson, R. (1997) Religious Education: an interpretive approach (London, Hodder & Stoughton).
    • James, W. (2002) The Varieties of Religious Experience (London and New York, Routledge).
    • Jantzen, G. (1998) Becoming Divine: Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Religion (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
    • Levinas, E. (1969) Totality and Infinity, A. Lingis, trans. (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff).
    • Levinas, E. (1981) Otherwise than Being, A. Lingis, trans. (The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff).
    • Levinas, E. (1990) Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism, S. Hand, trans. (Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press).
    • Levinas, E. (1998) Of God Who Comes to Mind, B. Bergo, trans. (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
    • McCutcheon, R. T. (1997) Manufacturing Religion: The Discourse on Sui Generis Religion and the Politics of Nostalgia (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
    • Morgan, M. L. (2007) Discovering Levinas (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
    • OFSTED (2007) Making Sense of Religion (London, Ofsted).
    • Peperzak, A. (1997) Beyond: The Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas (Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press).
    • !i"ek, S. (2006) How to Read Lacan (London, Granta).
    • !i"ek, S. (2008) The Fragile Absolute, or Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting For? (London and New York, Verso).
    • !i"ek, S. (2009) Violence (London, Profile).
    • !i"ek, S. and J. Milbank (2009) The Monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or Dialectic (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article