LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Canduela, Jesus; Chandler, Rachel; Elliott, Ian; Lindsay, Colin Dale; Macpherson, Suzi; McQuaid, Ronald W; Raeside, Robert (2010)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: 3304, 3321, 1407

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
This article explores the characteristics, destinations and progression routes of early school leavers – specifically ‘exceptional entry winter leavers’ – in Scotland. Exceptional entry allows students to enter college in the term before their statutory school leaving date – such young people attend college while formally remaining the responsibility of their school. Such arrangements represent an innovative model of supporting transitions to further education among a specific, potentially vulnerable client group, while also offering lessons for the development of school–college collaboration in other areas. Based on an analysis of official data, new survey research with schools and colleges, and in-depth case studies, this article identifies how schools and colleges work in partnership to support these early school leavers. We find that schools and colleges have developed a range of innovative approaches to engaging with winter leavers, and that the majority complete their programmes or achieve other positive end-of-year outcomes. However, the most disadvantaged young people remain least likely to progress. The article concludes by identifying lessons for good practice in school–college partnership-working and considering implications for policies to prevent young people from finding themselves not in employment, education or training.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, S., A. Biggart, K. Deacon, A. Furlong, L. Given, and K. Hinds. 2004. 17 in 2003: Evidence from the Scottish School Leavers Survey. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
    • Ball, S.J., S. Macrae, and M. Maguire. 1999. Young lives, diverse choices and imagined futures in an education and training market. International Journal of Inclusive Education 3, no. 3: 195-224.
    • Bathmaker, A. 2005. Hanging in or shaping a future? Defining a role for vocationally related learning in a knowledge society. Journal of Education Policy 201, no. 1: 81-100.
    • Biggart, A., and A. Walther. 2005. Young adults yo-yo transitions: Struggling for support between family and state in comparative perspective. In A new youth? Young people: Generations and family life, ed. C. Laccardi and E. Ruspini, 41-62. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    • Bynner, J., P. Elias, A. McKnight, H. Pan, and G. Pierre. 2002. Young people's changing routes to independence. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    • Cote, J., and J. Bynner. 2008. Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UK and Canada: The role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies 11, no. 3: 251-68.
    • DCSF (Department for Children, Schools and Families). 2007. Reducing the number of young people not in education, employment or training (NEET) - The strategy. London: DCSF.
    • Dekkers, H., and A. Claassen. 2001. Dropouts: Disadvantaged by definition? A study from the perspective of very early school leavers. Studies in Educational Evaluation 27: 341-54.
    • DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2006. Participation in education, training and employment by 16-18 year olds in England: 2004 and 2005. London: DfES.
    • Fenton, S., and E. Dermott. 2006. Fragmented careers: Winners and losers in young adult labour markets. Work, Employment and Society 20, no. 2: 205-21.
    • Furlong, A. 2006. Not a very NEET solution: Representing problematic labour market transitions among early school leavers. Work, Employment and Society 20, no. 3: 553-69.
    • Furlong, A., and F. Cartmel. 2004. Linearity and labour market transitions in the west of Scotland. Kyoiku (Education): Journal of the Association for the Scientific Study of Education 12: 102-11.
    • Gray, J., and N. Sime. 1990. Patterns of participation in full-time post-compulsory education. Sheffield: Training Agency.
    • Hodgson, A., C. Howieson, D. Raffe, K. Spours, and T. Tinklin. 2004. Post-16 curriculum and qualifications reform in England and Scotland: Lessons from home international comparisons. Journal of Education and Work 17, no. 4: 441-65.
    • Howieson, C. 2003. Destinations of early leavers. Edinburgh: Centre for Educational Sociology, University of Edinburgh.
    • Maguire, S., and J. Thompson. 2007. Young people not in education, employment or training: Where is government policy taking us now? Youth and Policy 96, no. 1: 5-17.
    • McQuaid, R.W., and S. Bond 2004. Gender stereotyping in career choice: Report to Career Development Edinburgh and Lothians. Edinburgh: Napier University.
    • Northern Ireland Executive. 2008. Success through skills progress report. Belfast: Northern Ireland Executive.
    • Pemberton, S. 2008. Tackling the NEET generation and the ability of policy to generate a NEET solution: Evidence from the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26, no. 1: 243-59.
    • QCA (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority). 2006. Report on vocational learning provision at key stage 4. London: QCA.
    • Ramsden, M., R.J. Bennett, and C. Fuller. 2004. Short-term policy and the changing institutional landscape of post-16 education and training: The case of learning partnerships in England, Scotland and Wales. Journal of Education and Work 17, no. 2: 139-65.
    • Scottish Executive. 2004. Building the foundations of a lifelong learning society: A review of collaboration between schools and further education colleges in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
    • Scottish Executive. 2005a. Lifelong partners: Scotland's schools and colleges building the foundations of a lifelong learning society. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
    • Scottish Executive. 2005b. Employability framework for Scotland: Report of the NEET workstream. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
    • Scottish Executive. 2006a. Workforce plus: An employability framework for Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
    • Scottish Executive. 2006b. More choices, more chances: A strategy to reduce the proportion of young people not in education, employment or training in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
    • Scottish Government. 2008a. 16+ learning choices: First step activity and financial support. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
    • Scottish Government. 2008b. Destinations of leavers from Scottish schools, 2006-07. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
    • Scottish Government. 2009. Curriculum for excellence senior phase: Management board discussion paper. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
    • Scottish Government. 2010. 16+ learning choices. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Education/skills-strategy/progress/sg/economic improvement/16PlusLearningChoices (accessed February 1, 2010).
    • Shih, T.H., and X. Fan. 2009. Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 4, no. 1: 26-40.
    • Spielhofer, T., and M. Walker 2008. Evaluation of skills for work pilot courses: Final report. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
    • Thompson, R. 2009. Social class and participation in further education: Evidence from the Youth Cohort Study in England and Wales. British Journal of Sociology of Education 30, no. 1: 29-42.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article