Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Wood, Jane L.; Williams, Graham Ross; James, Mark (2010)
Publisher: Routledge Journals
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H
The impact of incapacitation on prisoners’ offending behavior is a neglected area of research. The aim of this study was to examine the extent and nature of prisoners’ involvement in community-based crime in the U.K. Participants were selected from nine prisons in the UK and consisted of 360 prisoners, 81 females and 279 males. Offenders were interviewed to assess levels and forms of involvement in community-based crime and perceptions of other prisoners’ involvement. Levels of prisonization and institutional and demographic characteristics were used to identify vulnerability to involvement in community-based crime. Twenty-five percent of the sample admitted personal involvement and 63% reported other prisoners’ involvement in a diverse range of crimes. Analyses revealed prisoners involved in community-based crime are likely to be young, male recidivists who hold prisonized attitudes. Prisoners who are white, prisonized and recidivist reported highest levels of other prisoners’ involvement in community-based crime. No age or gender differences delineated prisoners’ reports of others’ involvement. The results show that incarcerating offenders may not prevent their involvement in community-based offending. Discussion centres on the characteristics of involved prisoners and considers the implications of the results for rehabilitation and penal policy.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bobrowski, L. J. (1988). Collecting, Organizing and Reporting Street Gang Crime. Chicago: Chicago Police Department Special Functions Group.
    • Buentello, L. S., Fong, R. S. & Vogel, R. E. (1991). Prison gang development: A theoretical model. The Prison Journal Vol. LXX1 (2): 3-9.
    • released from prison under Home Secretary Michael Howard. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43 (4), 390-404.
    • Camp, G. M. & Camp, C. G. (1985). Prison Gangs: Their extent, nature and impact on prisons. South Salem, NY: Criminal Justice Institute.
    • Cavadino, M. & Dignan, J. (2002). The Penal System (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
    • Clemmer, D. (1940). The Prison Community. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
    • Crewe, B. (2005) Codes and conventions: the terms and donditions of contemporary inmate values. In Liebling, A. & Maruna, S. (Eds.) The Effects of Imprisonment, Cullompton: Willan.
    • Crouch, B. M. & Marquart, J. W. (1989). An Appeal to Justice: Litigated reform of Texas prisons. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Prisons.
    • DiIulio, J. J. & Piehl, A. M. (1991). Does prison pay? The stormy national debate over the cost effectiveness of imprisonment. The Brookings Review, Fall, 28-35.
    • Drago, F., Galbrati, R. & Vertovs, P. (2007). The deterrent effects of prison: Evidence from a natural experiment. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2912. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from Social Science Research Network website: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1001201.
    • Duff, A. & Garland, D. (1994). A Reader on Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Elkins, M. & Olagundoye, J. (2001). The prison population in 2000: a statistical review. Home Office Publications, 154.
    • Farrington, D. (1986). The Cambridge Study on Delinquency: Long term follow-up. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    • Fong, R. S. & Buentello, S. (1991). The detection of prison gang development. Federal Probation 55 (1), 66-9.
    • Goodstein, L., MacKenzie, D. L. & Shotland, R. L. (1984). Personal control and inmate adjustment to prison. Criminology, 22 (3), 343-69.
    • Gover, A. R., MacKenzie, D. L. & Armstrong, G. S. (2000). Importation and deprivation explanations of juvenile adjustment to correctional facilities. International Journal of Offender Theory and Comparartive Criminology, 44 (4), 450-67.
    • Green, D. (2003). Crime is falling - because prison works. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from the Guardian Newspaper website: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/jul/20/prisonsandprobation.ukcrime.
    • Gudjonsson, G. (1992). The Psychology of Interrogation, Confessions and Testimony. Chichester: John Wiley.
    • Haney, C. (2005) The contextual revolution in psychology and the question of prison ethics. In Liebling, A. & Maruna, S. (Eds.) The Effects of Imprisonment, Cullompton: Willan.
    • Home Office (1991). Prison Disturbances April 1990, report of an inquiry by the Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Woolf (Parts I and II) and His Honour Judge Stephen Tumin (Part II), Cm. 1456, February, 1991. London: HMSO.
    • Huff, C. R. (1996). Gangs in America (2nd edn). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    • Irwin, J. & Owen, B. (2005). Harm and the contemporary prison. In Liebling, A. & Maruna, S. (Eds.) The Effects of Imprisonment, Cullompton: Willan.
    • Irwin, J. & Cressey, D. (1964). Theories, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems 10, 142-55.
    • Johnson, R. (2005). Brave new prisons: the growing social isolation of modern penal institutions. In Liebling, A. & Maruna, S. (Eds.) The Effects of Imprisonment, Cullompton: Willan.
    • King, R.D. & McDermott, K. (1995). The State of Our Prisons. Oxford: Clarendon
    • Koehler, R. (2000). The organisational structure and function of La Nuestra Familia within Colorado state correctional facilities. Deviant Behavior, 21, 155-79.
    • Knox, G. (1994). An Introduction to Gangs (3rd ed.). Bristol: Wyndham Hall press.
    • Marvel, T. B. & Moody, C. E. (1994). Prison population growth and crime reduction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10 (2), 109-40.
    • Mares, D. (2001). Gangstas or lager louts? Working class street gangs in Manchester. In M.W. Klein, H.J. Kerner, C.L. Maxson & E.G.M. Weitekamp (Eds.), The Eurogang Paradox (pp. 153-64). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
    • Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research: A review of the evidence and a research agenda for the outset of the 21st Century. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: An annual review of research, (Vol. 23, pp.1-42). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Paternoster, R. & Bynum, T. (1982). The Justice Model as ideology: A critical look at the impetus for sentencing reform. Contemporary Crises, 6, 7-24.
    • Pratt, D., Piper, M., Appleby, L., Webb, R., & Shaw, J. (2006) Suicide in recently released prisoners: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet, 368, 119-122
    • Ralph, P., Hunter, R. J., Marquart, J. W., Cuvelier S. J. & Merianos, D. (1996). Exploring the differences between gang and nongang prisoners. In R.C. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    • Sheldon, R. G. (1991). A comparison of gang members and non-gang members in a prison setting. The Prison Journal Vol. LXX1, 2, 50-60.
    • Sikes, G. (1997). 8 Ball Chicks. A year in the violent world of girl gangs. New York: Doubleday.
    • Sullivan, C. A. (1991). A look at the deadly gangs that receive little publicity. Police (Nov): 38-40, 91-92.
    • Swan, R. & James, P. (1998). The effect of the prison environment upon inmate drug taking behaviour. The Howard Journal, 37 (3), 252-65.
    • Thomas, C. W. & Zingraff, M. T. (1976). Organizational structure as a determinant of prisonization: An analysis of the consequences of alienation. Pacific Sociological Review, 19 (1), 98-117.
    • Visher, C. A. (1987). Incapacitation and crime control: D crime? Justice Quarterly, 4, 513-43.
    • West, D. J. (1982). Delinquency: Its roots, careers and prospects. London: Heinemann.
    • Wilson, D. & Ashton, J. (2001). What Everyone in Britain Should Know about Crime and Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Wood, J. & Adler, J. (2001). Gang activity in English prisons: The staff perspective. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7 (2), 167-92.
    • Wood, J. (2006). Gang activi Psychology, Crime and Law, 12 (6), 605-17.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article