OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hara, K.; Allport, P.P.; Baca, M.; Broughton, J.; Chisholm, A.; Nikolopoulos, K.; Pyatt, S.; Thomas, J.P.; Wilson, J.A.; Kierstead, J.; et al, (2016)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

arxiv: Physics::Instrumentation and Detectors
The ATLAS group has evaluated the charge collection in silicon microstrip sensors irradiated up to a fluence of 1×1016 neq/cm2, exceeding the maximum of 1.6×1015 neq/cm2 expected for the strip tracker during the high luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) period including a safety factor of 2. The ATLAS12, n+-on-p type sensor, which is fabricated by Hamamatsu Photonics (HPK) on float zone (FZ) substrates, is the latest barrel sensor prototype. The charge collection from the irradiated 1×1 cm2 barrel test sensors has been evaluated systematically using penetrating β-rays and an Alibava readout system. The data obtained at different measurement sites are compared with each other and with the results obtained from the previous ATLAS07 design. The results are very consistent, in particular, when the deposit charge is normalized by the sensor's active thickness derived from the edge transient current technique (edge-TCT) measurements. The measurements obtained using β-rays are verified to be consistent with the measurements using an electron beam. The edge-TCT is also effective for evaluating the field profiles across the depth. The differences between the irradiated ATLAS07 and ATLAS12 samples have been examined along with the differences among the samples irradiated with different radiation sources: neutrons, protons, and pions. The studies of the bulk properties of the devices show that the devices can yield a sufficiently large signal for the expected fluence range in the HL-LHC, thereby acting as precision tracking sensors.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] ATLAS Collaboration, J. Instrum. 3 (2008) S08003.
    • [2] S. McMahon, 2015, Presented at this symposium.
    • [3] M. Backhous, 2015, Presented at this symposium.
    • [4] I.-M. Gregor, 2015, Presented at this symposium.
    • [5] K. Hara, Y. Ikegami, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 731 (2013) 242.
    • [6] ATLAS Collaboration, CERN-2012-022, LHCC-1-023 (2012).
    • [7] I. Dawson, P. Miyagawa, ATL-GEN-2014-003 (2014).
    • [8] A. Vasilescu (INPE Bucharest), G. Lindstroem (University of Hamburg), Displacement damage in silicon, on-line compilation, 2000. 〈http://rd50.web. cern.ch/RD50/NIEL/default.html〉.
    • [9] I. Dawson, P. Miyagawa (U. Sheffield), 2015 August, Private Communication.
    • [10] K. Hara, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 636 (2011) S83.
    • [11] Y. Unno, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 636 (2011) S24.
    • [12] Y. Unno, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 765 (2014) 80.
    • [13] Alibava Systems, 2015, Homepage〈http://www.alibavasystems.com/〉.
    • [14] G. Kramberger, et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS 57 (2010) 2294.
    • [15] L. Snoj, G. Žerovnik, A. Trikov, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 70 (2012) 483.
    • [16] H. Bichsel, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60-3 (1988) 663.
    • [17] G. Lindstroem, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 512 (2003) 30.
    • [18] I. Mandic, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 629 (2011) 101.
    • [19] M. Moll, ROSE Collaboration, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 426 (1999) 87.
    • [20] RD50 Collaboration, CERN-LHCC-2010-012 and LHCC-SR-003 (2010).
    • [21] T. Affolder, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 623 (2010) 177.
    • [22] G. Kramberger, et al., J. Instrum. 9 (2014) P10016.
    • [23] V. Eremin, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 535 (2004) 622.
    • [24] T. Affolder et al., Communication with ATLAS ITk Strip Module group, September 2015.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • RCUK | ATLAS SCT Upgrade Module P...
  • EC | AIDA-2020
  • EC | AIDA

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok