Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Maguire, Stuart; Ojiako, Udechukwu (2008)
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: N100
Purpose – There has been a great deal of interest in ensuring that organisational strategy is successfully implemented in order to meet business objectives. More recently, reports of the failure of information systems and technology (IS&T) projects have become more regular and the reported failures more spectacular. This has added to a growing perception that IS&T implementation approaches currently utilised are struggling to add value to customers and users, leading to calls for a re-think of how IS&T is introduced into organisations. This paper seeks to develop a customer experience strategy which will give a key group of stakeholders, customers, a major input in the IS&T development process. \ud Design/methodology/approach – The approach taken to examine IS&T implementation at this stage of the development of this theme is empirical. The failed introduction of a new IS&T system in a major service organisation in the UK is used as a case study. Data were gathered from 22 face-to-face interviews with key stakeholders in the IS&T project. Findings – The paper finds that the failure was driven by a number of factors, including poor project management and a lack of understanding of how systems can negatively affect organisations and customer relationships. The paper re-emphasises the need to ensure that customer and user perceptions are taken into consideration during any major systems introduction project. An interesting aspect of these systems is that a version is being used today by the organisation. \ud Research limitations/implications – The customer experience journey (CEJ) framework will be improved by being validated within another organisation. \ud Practical implications – The paper recognises that, in the future, a clear framework to support the CEJ needs to be well thought out before a major systems introduction project commences. This is increasingly important as many roll-outs are trans-national and involve customers and supply chains. Originality/value – The paper contributes to work practice relating to customer-driven IS&T service introduction.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Applegate, L., McFarlan, F. and McKenney, J. (1996), Corporate Information Systems Management:Text and Cases, 4th ed., Times Mirror, New York, NY.
    • Avgerou, C. and Cornford, T. (1988), Developing Information Systems:Concepts, Issues and Practice, MacMillan, Basingstoke.
    • Bhatt, G.D. and Grover, V. (2005), “Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: an empirical study”, Journal ofManagement Information Systems, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 253-77.
    • Brooke, C. and Maguire, S. (1998), “Systems development - a restrictive practice?”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 165-80.
    • CIO Magazine (2000), “ERP training stinks”, CIO Magazine, available at: www.cio.com/archive/ 060100 _erp.html (accessed 24 November 2004).
    • Collins, A. and Bicknell, D. (2000), Crash, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
    • Cook, A. and Davis, C. (2003), “Shifting gears to accommodate diversity: how and why an information systems project manager should customize leadership style to suit multicultural teams”, paper presented at the 2003 Southwest Decision Sciences Institute Conference (SWDSI2003), pp. 126-31.
    • Drug Store News (1998), “FoxMeyer litigation continues with suits against SAP”, Drug Store News, 21 September.
    • Gales, L. and Mansour-Cole, D. (1995), “User involvement in innovation projects: toward an information processing model”,Journal ofEngineering & Technology Management, Vol.12 Nos 1/2, pp. 77-109.
    • Geddes, M. (1990), “Project leadership and the involvement of users in IT projects”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 214-6.
    • Maguire, S. (2000), “Towards a 'business-led' approach to information systems development”, Information Management & Computer Security, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 230-8. Maguire, S. (2002), “Identifying risks during information systems development: managing the process”, Information Management & Computer Security, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 126-34.
    • Maguire, S. (2007), “Reviewing 25 years of national information systems in the N.H.S.”, Public Money & Management, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 135-40.
    • Ojiako, G.U. and Greenwood, D. (2007), “Information systems and technology service introduction success criteria”, Portland International Centre for Management of Engineering and Technology. Management of Converging Technologies. PICMET 2007 Conference. Portland State University, 5-9 August.
    • Ojiako, G.U., Greenwood, D. and Johansen, E. (2004), “The impact of strategy on ICT projects”, Journal of ICT, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 77-86.
    • Saeki, Y. and Watanabe, T. (1999), “Modular implementation technique for efficient reflective programming languages”, IPSJ Transactions on Programming, Vol. 40, SIG10 -008.
    • Santhanan, R. and Hartono, E. (2003), “Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 125-53.
    • Sauer, C. (1993), Why Information Systems Fail: A Case Study Approach, Alfred Waller, Henley-onThames.
    • Southon, G., Sauer, C. and Dampney, C.N.G. (1999), “Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations”, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 55, pp. 33-46.
    • Walsham, G. (1993), Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations, Wiley, Chichester.
    • Yin, R. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. Further reading
    • Maguire, S. and Redman, T. (2007), “The role of human resource management in information systems development”, Management Decision, Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 252-64.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok