Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Betts, LR; Bostock, LR; Elder, TJ; Trueman, M (2013)
Publisher: British Psychological Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
There is growing concern among many regarding plagiarism within student writing . This has promoted investigation in to both the factors that predict plagiarism and potential methods of reducing plagiarism. Consequently, we developed and evaluated an intervention to enhance good practice within academic writing through the use of the plagiarism detection software Turnitin. One hundred and sixteen first-year Psychology students submitted work to Turnitin and 71 of these students evaluated their learning experiences. For the next assignment the students completed, there was a reduction in academic misconduct cases compared to the previous year and students evaluated the session positively. The findings have implications for teaching good practice in academic writing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • MacMillian, D. (2007). Looking over Turnitin's shoulder. Bussiness Week Online, 13/3/2007, 6.
    • Maier, P., & Warren, A. (2000). Integr@ting technology in learning & teaching: A practical guide for educators. London: Kogan Page.
    • Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229-241.
    • Norton, L. S., Tilley, A. J., Newstead, S. E., & Franklyn-Stokes, A. (2001). The pressures of assessment in undergraduate courses and their effect on student behaviours. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 269-284.
    • Parameswaran, A., & Devi, P. (2006). Student plagiarism and faculty responsibility in undergraduate engineering labs. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 263-276.
    • Pilon, M. (2006). Anti-plagiarism programs look over students' work. US Today, 23/05/06.
    • Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J., Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2009). Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity and academic writing. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 153-170.
    • Robertson, M. (2007). Post to JISC plagiarism mail list. Retrieved from http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgibin/webadmin?A2=ind0706&L=plagiarism&T=0&F=&S=&P=781accessed 5th July 2007.
    • Rolfe, V. (2011). Can Turnitin be used to provide instant formative feedback?British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 701-710.
    • Royce, J. (2003). Has Turnitin.com got it all wrapped up? Teacher Librarian, 30, 26- 31.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article