LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Johnston, Bridget (2014)
Publisher: Dove Press
Journal: Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: R855-855.5, Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth, Medical technology
Bridget M Johnston Sue Ryder Care Centre for the Study of Supportive, Palliative, and End of Life Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK Abstract: This critical review paper explores the concept of palliative home-based technology from a practitioner's perspective. The aim of the critical review was to scope information available from published and unpublished research on the current state of palliative home-based technology, practitioner-focused perspectives, patient-focused perspectives, quality of life, and the implications for clinical practice. Published and unpublished studies were included. An example of one UK patient-centered home-based technology is explored as an exemplar. The evidence suggests that despite the challenges, there are numerous examples of good practice in relation to palliative home-based technology. Improvements in technology mean that telehealth has much to offer people being cared for at home with palliative needs. However, some of the evaluative evidence is limited, and further rigor is needed when evaluating future technology-based solutions innovations. Keywords: technology, telehealth, telemedicine, information technology, palliative care, hospice, terminal illness
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Scottish Government. Living and Dying Well: A National Action Plan for Palliative and End of Life Care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2008.
    • 2. Martin-Moreno J, Harris M, Gorgojo L, Clark D, Normand C, Carlos C. Palliative Care in the European Union. European Parliament Economic and Scientific Policy Department; 2008.
    • 3. Ahmedzai S, Costa A, Blengini C, et al. A new international framework for palliative care. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(15):2192-2200.
    • 4. World Health Organization. WHO denfiition of palliative care [web page on the Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/ definition/en /. Accessed September 9, 2014.
    • 5. Brown S. Next generation telecare and its role in primary and community care. Health Soc Care Community. 2003;11(6):4.
    • 6. Hughes R. Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(4):340-346.
    • 7. Scottish Government. Better Health, Better Care: Action Plan. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2007.
    • 8. Weinstein RS, Lopez AM, Joseph BA, et al. Telemedicine, telehealth, and mobile health applications that work: opportunities and barriers. Am J Med. 2014;127(3):183-187.
    • 9. Smith AC. Telemedicine: challenges and opportunities. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4(1):5-7.
    • 10. Smith AC, Gray LC. Telemedicine across the ages. Med J Aust. 2009;190(1):15-19.
    • 11. Higginson I. Priorities and Preferences for End of Life Care in England, Wales and Scotland. London, UK: National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care Services; 2003.
    • 12. Dying Matters Coalition. ComRes Survey on Attitudes Towards Dying, Death and Bereavement Commissioned by the Dying Matters Coalition; 2011.
    • 13. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Higginson IJ. Reversal of the British trends in place of death: time series analysis 2004-2010. Palliat Med. 2012;26(2):102-107.
    • 14. Gomes B, Higginson IJ. Where people die (1974-2030): past trends, future projections and implications for care. Palliat Med. 2008;22(1):33.
    • 15. Ekfors H, Petersson K. A qualitative study of the experiences during radiotherapy of Swedish patients suffering from lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31(2):329-334.
    • 16. Freir V, Kirkwood K, Peck D, Robertson S, Scott-Lodge L, Zeffert S. Telemedicine for clinical psychology in the Highlands of Scotland. J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5(3):157.
    • 17. Lind L, Karlsson D. A system for symptom assessment in advanced palliative home healthcare using digital pens. Inform Health Soc Care. 2004;29(3-4):199-210.
    • 18. Demiris G, Oliver D, Courtney K. Ethical considerations for the utilization of telehealth technologies in home and hospice care by the nursing profession. Nurs Adm Q. 2006;30(1):56-66.
    • 19. McCall K, Keen J, Farrer K, et al. Perceptions of the use of a remote monitoring system in patients receiving palliative care at home. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2008;14(9):426-431.
    • 20. Johnston B, Kidd L, Wengstrom Y, Kearney N. An evaluation of the use of telehealth within palliative care settings across Scotland. Palliat Med. 2011;26(2):152-161.
    • 21. Maudlin J, Keene J, Kobb R. A road map for the last journey: home telehealth for holistic end-of-life care. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006;23(5):399-403.
    • 22. Watanabe SM, Fairchild A, Pituskin E, Borgersen P, Hanson J, Fassbender K. Improving access to specialist multidisciplinary palliative care consultation for rural cancer patients by videoconferencing: report of a pilot project. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(4):1201-1207.
    • 23. van Gurp J, Hasselaar J, van Leeuwen E, Hoek P, Vissers K, van Selm M. Connecting with patients and instilling realism in an era of emerging communication possibilities: a review on palliative care communication heading to telecare practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(3):504-514.
    • 24. Kamal AH, Swetz KM, Dy S, Tien AY, Temel JS, Abernethy AP. Integrating technology into palliative care research. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2012;6(4):525-532.
    • 25. Andre B, Ringdal GI, Loge JH, Rannestad T, Kaasa S. The importance of key personnel and active management for successful implementation of computer-based technology in palliative care: results from a qualitative study. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008;26(4):183-189.
    • 26. Roberts D, Tayler C, MacCormack D, Barwich D. Telenursing in hospice palliative care. Can Nurse. 2007;103(5):24.
    • 27. May C, Harrison R, Finch T, MacFarlane A, Mair F, Wallace P. Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. BMJ. 2003;10(6):596.
    • 28. May C, Mort M, Williams T, Mair F, Gask L. Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(4):697-710.
    • 29. Fischer S, Stewart T, Mehta S, Wax R, Lapinsky S. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10(2):139.
    • 30. Jerant A, Azari R, Nesbitt T. Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure: a randomized trial of a home telecare intervention. Med Care. 2001;39(11):1234-1245.
    • 31. Field M, Grigsby J. Telemedicine and remote patient monitoring. JAMA. 2002;288(4):423.
    • 32. Mooney K, Beck S, Friedman R, Farzanfar R. Telephone-linked care for cancer symptom monitoring. Cancer Pract. 2002;10(3):147-154.
    • 33. Kearney N, McCann L, Norrie J, et al. Evaluation of a mobile phonebased, advanced symptom management system (ASyMS©) in the management of chemotherapy-related toxicity. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(4):437-444.
    • 34. Regnard C. Using videoconferencing in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2000;14(6):519.
    • 35. Norum J, Jordhoy M. A university oncology department and a remote palliative care unit linked together by email and videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(2):92.
    • 36. Coyle N, Khojainova N, Francavilla J, Gonzales G. Audio-visual communication and its use in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;23(2):171-175.
    • 37. Oliver P, Debra R, Demiris G, Porock D. The usability of videophones for seniors and hospice providers: a brief report of two studies. Comput Biol Med. 2005;35(9):782-790.
    • 38. van Gurp J, van Selm M, van Leeuwen E, Hasselaar J. Transmural palliative care by means of teleconsultation: a window of opportunities and new restrictions. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14(1):12.
    • 39. Young G. Implementing a patient administration system. European Journal of Palliative Care. 2000;7(1):26-28.
    • 40. Marie Curie Cancer Care. Telemedicine Supporting Delivering Palliative Care Services and Education In Rural Wales: London: Marie Curie Cancer Care; 2008.
    • 41. Saysell E, Routley C. Telemedicine in community-based palliative care: evaluation of a videolink teleconference project. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003;9(11):489.
    • 42. Lloyd-Williams M, Rashid A. An analysis of calls to an out-of-hours palliative care advice line. Public Health. 2003;117(2):125-127.
    • 43. Yardley S, Codling J, Roberts D. Experiences of 24-hour advice line services: a framework for good practice and meeting NICE guidelines. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2009;15(6):266.
    • 44. Salt S. Letter to the Editor: What kind of requests do healthcare professionals make of a telephone out of hours specialist palliative care advice service? The experience of one hospice over a year. Palliat Med. 2007;21(1):61.
    • 45. Kuziemsky C, Jahnke J, Lau F. The e-hospice: beyond traditional boundaries of palliative care. Telematics and Informatics. 2006;23(2):117-133.
    • 46. Demiris G, Oliver D, Fleming D, Edison K. Hospice staff attitudes towards telehospice. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2004;21(5):343.
    • 47. Chochinov H, Stern A. The Canadian Virtual Hospice http://www. virtualhospice.ca. J Palliat Care. 2005;20(1):5-6.
    • 48. Canadian Virtual Hospice [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: http://www.virtualhospice.ca/. Accessed September 9, 2014.
    • 49. ehospice [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: http://www. ehospice.com/uk/en-gb/aboutus.aspx. Accessed September 9, 2014.
    • 50. Colvin J, Chenoweth L, Bold M, Harding C. Caregivers of older adults: advantages and disadvantages of internet based social support. Fam Relat. 2004;53(1):49-57.
    • 51. Demiris G, Parker ODR, Courtney KL, Porock D. Use of technology as a support mechanism for caregivers of hospice patients. J Palliat Care. 2005;21(4):303.
    • 52. White MH, Dorman SM. Online support for caregivers: analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. Comput Nurs. 2000;18(4):168-180.
    • 53. Johnston BM, Maguire R, Connaghan J, Kotronoulas G, Taylor A, Kearney N. Developing and testing an intervention to monitor symptoms in patients receiving palliative care at home using the mobile phone based remote monitoring Advanced Symptom Management System (Palliative Care). The ASyMS©-P Study. Dundee: University of Dundee; 2011.
    • 54. Thekkumpurath P, Venkateswaran C, Kumar M, Newsham A, Bennett M. Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: performance of touch screen questionnaires compared with semistructured psychiatric interview. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38(4):597-605.
    • 55. Maguire R, Cowie J, Leadbetter C, et al. The development of a side effect risk assessment tool (ASyMS©-SERAT) for use in patients with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. J Res Nurs. 2009;14(1):27.
    • 56. Bedini R, Belardinelli A, Giansanti D, Guerriero L, Macellari V, Morelli S. Quality assessment and cataloguing of telemedicine applications. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12(4):189.
    • 57. Sealy T, Perry F, Stockdale S. Audit of a specialist palliative care triage advice line within South Tees. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2014;4:A87-A88.
    • 58. Wye L, Lasseter G, Percival J, Duncan L, Simmonds B, Purdy S. What works in 'real life' to facilitate home deaths and fewer hospital admissions for those at end of life? Results from a realist evaluation of new palliative care services in two English counties. BMC Palliat Care. 2014;13(1):37.
    • 59. Campbell C, Harper A, Elliker M. Introducing 'Palcall': an innovative out-of-hours telephone service led by hospice nurses. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2005;11(11):586.
    • 60. Laila M, Rialle V, Nicolas L, Duguay C, Franco A. Videophones for the delivery of home healthcare in oncology. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:39.
    • 61. Hebert MA, Paquin M-Je, Whitten L, Cai P. Analysis of the suitability of 'video-visits' for palliative home care: implications for practice. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(2):74-78.
    • 62. Doolittle GC, Whitten P, Mccartney M, Cook D, Nazir N. An empirical chart analysis of the suitability of telemedicine for hospice visits. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(1):90-97.
    • 63. Gagnon M-P, Lamothe L, Hebert M, Chanliau J, Fortin J-P. Telehomecare for vulnerable populations: the evaluation of new models of care. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(3):324-331.
    • 64. Finch T, May C, Mair F, Mort M, Gask L. Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study. BMJ. 2003;327(7425):1205.
    • 65. Jennett P, Gagnon M, Brandstadt H. Preparing for success: readiness models for rural telehealth. J Postgrad Med. 2005;51(4):279.
    • 66. Becker R. Can the palliative care services of today keep up and match the expectations of the 'baby boomer' generation? Int J Palliat Nurs. 2009;15(3):108.
    • 67. Brigden M, MintyA, Pilatzke S, dellaVedova L, Sherrington L, McPhail K. Strengths and weaknesses of teleoncology. Oncology Exchange. 2008;7:8-12.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article