Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Karamshuk, Dmytro; Lokot, Tetyana; Pryymak, Oleksandr; Sastry, Nishanth (2017)
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Contribution for newspaper or weekly magazine
Subjects: Political science, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2600/2614, Theoretical Computer Science, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Computer Science(all), Mass media, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1700, Journalism

In this paper, we are interested in understanding the interrelationships between mainstream and social media in forming public opinion during mass crises, specifically in regards to how events are framed in the mainstream news and on social networks and to how the language used in those frames may allow to infer political slant and partisanship. We study the lingual choices for political agenda setting in mainstream and social media by analyzing a dataset of more than 40M tweets and more than 4M news articles from the mass protests in Ukraine during 2013–2014—known as “Euromaidan”—and the post-Euromaidan conflict between Russian, pro-Russian and Ukrainian forces in eastern Ukraine and Crimea. We design a natural language processing algorithm to analyze at scale the linguistic markers which point to a particular political leaning in online media and show that political slant in news articles and Twitter posts can be inferred with a high level of accuracy. These findings allow us to better understand the dynamics of partisan opinion formation during mass crises and the interplay between mainstream and social media in such circumstances.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. An, J., Cha, M., Gummadi, K.P., Crowcroft, J., Quercia, D.: Visualizing media bias through Twitter. In: Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012)
    • 2. An, J., Cha, M., Gummadi, P.K., Crowcroft, J.: Media landscape in Twitter: A world of new conventions and political diversity. In: ICWSM (2011)
    • 3. An, J., Quercia, D., Cha, M., Gummadi, K., Crowcroft, J.: Sharing political news: the balancing act of intimacy and socialization in selective exposure. EPJ Data Science 3(1), 1-21 (2014)
    • 4. An, J., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Fragmented social media: a look into selective exposure to political news. In: Proc. World Wide Web companion (2013)
    • 5. An, J., Quercia, D., Crowcroft, J.: Partisan sharing: Facebook evidence and societal consequences. In: Proc. ACM COSN (2014)
    • 6. Arag´on, P., Volkovich, Y., Laniado, D., Kaltenbrunner, A.: When a movement becomes a party: Computational assessment of new forms of political organization in social media. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
    • 7. Boutet, A., Kim, H., Yoneki, E.: What's in Twitter, I know what parties are popular and who you are supporting now! Social Network Analysis and Mining 3(4), 1379- 1391 (2013)
    • 8. Brodersen, A., Scellato, S., Wattenhofer, M.: Youtube around the world: geographic popularity of videos. In: Proc. WWW (2012)
    • 9. Chakraborty, A., Ghosh, S., Ganguly, N., Gummadi, K.P.: Dissemination biases of social media channels: On the topical coverage of socially shared news. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
    • 10. Cohen, R., Ruths, D.: Classifying political orientation on Twitter: It's not easy! In: ICWSM (2013)
    • 11. Conover, M.D., Gon¸calves, B., Ratkiewicz, J., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Predicting the political alignment of Twitter users. In: Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT) and 2011 IEEE Third Inernational Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on. pp. 192-199. IEEE (2011)
    • 12. Diuk, N.: Euromaidan: Ukraine's self-organizing revolution. World Affairs 176(6), 9-16 (2014)
    • 13. Goldstein, J.: The role of digital networked technologies in the ukrainian orange revolution. Berkman Center Research Publication (2007)
    • 14. Gonza´lez-Bailo´n, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Moreno, Y.: Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioral Scientist (2013)
    • 15. Gonza´lez-Bailo´n, S., et al.: The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific reports 1 (2011)
    • 16. Hegelich, S., Janetzko, D.: Are social bots on twitter political actors? empirical evidence from a ukrainian social botnet. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
    • 17. Howard, P.N.: The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: Information technology and political Islam. Oxford University Press (2010)
    • 18. Mikolov, T., et al.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: NIPS (2013)
    • 19. Mikolov, T., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of Workshop at ICLR (2013)
    • 20. Oates, S., Lokot, T.: Twilight of the gods?: How the Internet challenged russian television news frames in the winter protests of 2011-12. In: International Association for Media and Communication Research Annual Conference (2013)
    • 21. Onuch, O.: Euromaidan protests in ukraine: Social media versus social networks. Problems of Post-Communism 62, 1-19 (2015)
    • 22. Papacharissi, Z., Chadwick, A.: The virtual sphere 2.0: The internet, the public sphere, and beyond. Routledge handbook of internet politics pp. 230-245 (2009)
    • 23. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. pp. 430-438. ACM (2011)
    • 24. Pennacchiotti, M., Popescu, A.M.: A machine learning approach to Twitter user classification. ICWSM 11(1), 281-288 (2011)
    • 25. Szostek, J.: The media battles of ukraine's euromaidan. Digital Icons 11, 1-19 (2014)
    • 26. Vijayaraghavan, P., Vosoughi, S., Roy, D.: Automatic detection and categorization of election-related tweets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05150 (2016)
    • 27. Zelinska, O.: Who were the protestors and what did they want? Demokratizatsiya 23(4) (2015)
    • 28. Zeng, L., Starbird, K., Spiro, E.S.: # unconfirmed: Classifying rumor stance in crisis-related social media messages. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)
    • 29. Zhukov, Y.M., Baum, M.A.: Reporting bias and information warfare. In: International Studies Association Annual Convention (2016)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article