LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
(2007)
Publisher: Portland Press Limited
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Medicine
Abstract Despite its extensive use in physiological and clinical research, the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) is still poorly supported by sound reliability studies. The main aim of this study was to make an in-depth assessment of absolute and relative reliability of standard indexes of HRV from short-term laboratory recordings. In 39 healthy subjects (mean age (min-max): 38 (26-56) years, 18 men and 21 women) we recorded 5 + 5 min of supine ECG during spontaneous and paced (15 breaths/min) breathing. The test was repeated on the next day in the same conditions. From RR intervals we computed standard indexes of HRV: SDNN, RMSSD, LF and HF power (absolute and normalized units) and LF/HF. Absolute reliability was assessed by the 95% limits of random variation (RV); relative reliability was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The sample size needed to detect a mean difference ?30% of the between-subject SD was also estimated. Although there was no significant mean change between the two tests, we found that in individual subjects the second measurement can be as high/low as 1.9/0.5 times (SDNN, best case) and 3.5/0.3 times (LF/HF, worst case) the first measurement, due to pure random variation. For most parameters the ICC was > 0.8 (range: 0.65-0.88). The estimated sample size ranged from 24 to 98 subjects. Reliability indexes tended to improve during paced breathing. We conclude that short-term HRV parameters are subject to large day-to-day random variations. Random error, however, represents a limited portion of between-subject variability; therefore observed differences between individuals reflect mostly differences in the subjects' error-free value rather than random error. Overall, paced breathing improves reliability. (Pinna, Gian Domenico) Department of Biomedical Engineering, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS - ITALY (Pinna, Gian Domenico) ITALY
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Berger AC, Cohen RJ. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science. 1981; 213(4504): 220-222.
    • [2] Sandercock GR, Bromley PD, Brodie DA. The reliability of short-term measurements of heart rate variability. Int J Cardiol.. 2005; 103 (3): 238-247.
    • [4] Schroeder EB, Whitsel EA, Evans GW, Prineas RJ, Chambless LE, Heiss G. Repeatability of heart rate variability measures. J Electrocardiol. 2004; 37 (3): 163-172. 0.5
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.