Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dubois, Sara; Fraser, David (2013)
Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Journal: Animals
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: attitudes, British Columbia, intentional feeding, QL1-991, black bear, human-wildlife conflict, SF600-1100, Article, telephone survey, Veterinary medicine, food-conditioned, Christina Lake, Zoology
Simple Summary The “pot bears” received international media attention in 2010 after police discovered the intentional feeding of black bears during the investigation of an alleged marijuana-growing operation in Christina Lake, British Columbia. Residents of this small community were surveyed by phone twice over the following year, before and after government actions. This study aimed to understand local attitudes on how these bears should be managed and whether they differed from existing bear management policy. Results indicate a significant problem with the public view of wildlife feeding and a gap between public and expert opinion on relocation and killing of food-conditioned wildlife. Abstract The “pot bears” received international media attention in 2010 after police discovered the intentional feeding of over 20 black bears during the investigation of an alleged marijuana-growing operation in Christina Lake, British Columbia, Canada. A two-phase random digit dialing survey of the community was conducted in 2011 to understand local perspectives on bear policy and management, before and after a summer of problem bear activity and government interventions. Of the 159 households surveyed in February 2011, most had neutral or positive attitudes towards bears in general, and supported the initial decision to feed the food-conditioned bears until the autumn hibernation. In contrast to wildlife experts however, most participants supported relocating the problem bears, or allowing them to remain in the area, ahead of killing; in part this arose from notions of fairness despite the acknowledged problems of relocation. Most locals were aware of the years of feeding but did not report it, evidently failing to see it as a serious form of harm, even after many bears had been killed. This underscores the importance of preventive action on wildlife feeding and the need to narrow the gap between public and expert opinion on the likely effects of relocation versus killing.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Hristienko, H.; McDonald, J.E., Jr. Going into the 21st century: A perspective on trends and controversies in the management of the American black bear. Ursus 2007, 18, 72-88.
    • A proposed lexicon of terms and concepts for human-bear management in North America. Ursus 2010, 21, 154-168.
    • Spencer, R.D.; Beausoleil, R.A.; Martorello, D.A. How agencies respond to human-black bear conflicts: A survey of wildlife agencies in North America. Ursus 2007, 18, 217-229.
    • Badry, M. BC Ministry of Environment. Personal communication, 30 April 2010.
    • 6. Harshaw, H.W. Public participation in British Columbia forest management. Forest. Chron. 2010, 86, 697-708.
    • 7. Decker, D.J.; Krueger, C.C.; Baer, R.A.J.; Knuth, B.A.; Richmond, M.E. From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 1996, 1, 70-82.
    • 8. Manfredo, M.J.; Decker, D.J.; Duda, M.D. What is the future for human dimensions of wildlife? In Proceedings of 63rd North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 20-25 March 1998; pp. 278-292.
    • 9. Don Carlos, A.W.; Bright, A.D.; Teel, T.L.; Vaske, J.J. Human-black bear conflict in urban areas: An integrated approach to management response. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2009, 14, 174-184.
    • 10. Lauber, T.B.; Knuth, B.A. Citizen Participation in Natural Resource Management: A Synthesis of HDRU Research; HDRU Series No. 00-7; Human Dimensions Research Unit, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2000.
    • 11. Hoggan, K. Exclusive: Interview with officers who raided bear-protected grow op. The Castlegar Source. Available online: http://castlegarsource.com/node/6806 (accessed on 18 August 2010).
    • 12. Belfast Telegraph. Bears found wandering in marijuana fields. Available online: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/bears-found-wandering-in-marijuana-fields14918357.html (accessed on 20 August 2010).
    • 13. OneIndia News. Royal Canadian Mounted Police shocked to find bears guarding marijuana grow-op. Available online: http://news.oneindia.in/2010/08/20/royalcanadian-mounted-police-shocked-tofind-bearsguarding.html (accessed on 20 August 2010).
    • 14. The Australian. Dope growers' bears face a grisly fate. Available online: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/dope-growers-bears-face-a-grisly-fate/story-e6frg6so1225907947813 (accessed on 21 August 2010).
    • 15. National Post. One 'oddball,' 10 black bears, and $1M worth of pot. Available online: http://news.nationalpost.com/2010/08/19/b-c-marijuana-grow-op-discovered-with-at-least-10-bearson-property/ (accessed on 19 August 2010).
    • 16. The Bear Dude. Available online: http://thebeardude.net/ (accessed 30 August 2010).
    • 17. Government of British Columbia. Ministry of Environment, Conservation Officer Service. Available online: http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/cos/info/bearaware/co_response.html (accessed 8 December 2010).
    • 18. Government of British Columbia. Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks. Black Bears in British Columbia: Ecology, Conservation and Management. Available online: http://env.gov.bc.ca/ wld/documents/blackbear.pdf (accessed 8 December 2010).
    • 19. Wolowicz, M. BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations. Personal communication, 7 June 2011.
    • 20. CBC News. B.C. pot bears can keep feeding until hibernation. Available online: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2010/08/31/bc-christina-lake-black-bears.html (accessed on 31 August 2010).
    • 21. Beckmann, J.P.; Berger, J. Rapid ecological and behavioural changes in carnivores: The responses of black bears (Ursus americanus) to altered food. J. Zool. 2003, 261, 207-212.
    • 22. Merkle, J.A.; Robinson, H.S.; Krausman, P.R.; Alaback, P. Food availability and foraging near human developments by black bears. J. Mammal. 2013, 94, 378-385.
    • 23. Gigliotti, L.M. Comparison of an internet versus mail survey: A case study. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2011, 16, 55-62.
    • 24. Lavrakas, P.J. Telephone Survey Methods-Sampling, Selection, and Supervision, 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1993.
    • 25. Kempf, A.M.; Remington, P.L. New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2007, 28, 113-126.
    • 26. Kuusela, V.; Callegaro, M.; Vehovar, V. The influence of mobile telephones on telephone surveys. In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology; Lepkowski, J.M., Tucker, C., Brick, J.M., de Leeuw, E.D., Japec, L., Lavrakas, P.J., Link, M.W., Sangster, R.L., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 87-112.
    • 27. Tucker, C.; Lepkowski, J.M. Telephone survey methods: Adapting to change. In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology; Lepkowski, J.M., Tucker, C., Brick, J.M., de Leeuw, E.D., Japec, L., Lavrakas, P.J., Link, M.W., Sangster, R.L., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 3-28.
    • 28. Gillham, B. Small-Scale Social Survey Methods; Bloomsbury: London, UK, 2008.
    • 29. Dillman, D.A. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2000.
    • 30. BC Stats. Census Profile 2006-Christina Lake, UNP. Available online: http://www.bcstats. gov.bc.ca/data/cen06/profiles/detailed/05050037.pdf (accessed 8 December 2010).
    • 31. Kalsbeek, W.D.; Botman, S.L.; Massey, J.T.; Liu, P.W. Cost-efficiency and the number of allowable call attempts in the national health interview survey. J. Offic. Stat. 1994, 10, 133-152.
    • 32. Vaske, J.J. Survey Research and Analysis: Applications in Parks, Recreation and Human Dimensions; Venture Publishing, Inc.: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2008; pp. 211-229.
    • 33. Elo, S.; Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008, 62, 107-115.
    • 34. Christina Lake Stewardship Society. Christina Lake Watershed Management Plan Review 2011. Session 1c: Conservation Officer Dave Webster. Available online: http://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=d6XxNCjIWxs&list=PL11EC7B4E40DEFC14&index=3&feature=plpp_video (accessed on 23 February 2012).
    • 35. La Croix, B. Christina Lake becoming bear aware. Grand Forks Gazette. Available online: http://www.bclocalnews.com/kootenay_rockies/grandforksgazette/community/119336649.html (accessed on 6 April 2011).
    • 36. Ericsson, G.; Heberlein, T.A. Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 111, 149-159.
    • 37. Williams, C.K.; Ericsson, G.; Heberlein, T.A. A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their reintroduction (1972-2000). Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2002, 30, 575-584.
    • 38. Songorwa, A.N.; Buhrs, T.; Hughey, F.D. Community-Based Wildlife Management in Africa: A critical assessment of the literature. Nat. Resour. J. 2000, 40, 603-643.
    • 39. Karlsson, J.; Sjostrom, M. Human attitudes towards wolves, a matter of distance. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 137, 610-616.
    • 40. Lancaster, B.-L.; Campbell, M. Public attitudes toward black bears (Ursus americanus) and cougars (Puma concolor) on Vancouver Island. Soc. Anim. 2010, 18, 40-57.
    • 41. Landriault, L.J.; Brown, G.S.; Hamr, J.; Mallory, F.F. Age, Sex and Relocation Distance as Predictors of Return for Relocated Nuisance Black Bears (Ursus americanus) in Ontario, Canada. Wildlife Biol. 2009, 15, 155-164.
    • 42. Dubois, S.; Harshaw, H.W. Exploring “humane” dimensions of wildlife. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 2013, 18, 1-19.
    • 43. Reed, M. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 2417-2431.
    • 44. On March 24, 2011, “The Bear Dude” pleaded guilty to feeding dangerous wildlife [45], an offense under the BC Wildlife Act that carries up to a $100,000 fine and/or a year in jail. Sentencing for the 2010 incident was delayed until December 2011. However, in November 2011 charges were laid again against two individuals for feeding dangerous wildlife again on the same property that year [46]. On May 24, 2012, “The Bear Dude” received a $6,000 fine for feeding dangerous wildlife [47].
    • 45. Shepard, C. 'Bear Dude' pleads guilty to feeding bears. News in the Kootenays. Available online: http://news.inthekoots.com/2011/03/25/bear-dude-pleads-guilty-to-feeding-bears/ (accessed on 25 March 2011).
    • 46. The Province. Christina Lake man charged with resuming his banquet for black bears. Available online: http://www.theprovince.com/news/Christina+Lake+charged+with+resuming+banquet+black+ bears/5720628/story.html (accessed 16 November 2011).
    • 47. CBC News. B.C. man fined $6,000 for feeding 'pot bears'. Available online: http://www.cbc.ca/ news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/05/24/bc-pot-bears-fine-feeding.html (accessed on 24 May 2012).
    • 48. Dubois, S.; Fraser, D. Rating harms to wildlife: A survey showing convergence between conservation. Anim. Welf. 2013, 22, 49-55.
    • 49. Beckmann, J.P.; Lackey, C.W.; Berger, J. Evaluation of deterrent techniques and dogs to alter behavior of “nuisance” black bears. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2004, 32, 1141-1146.
    • 50. Gore, M.L.; Knuth, B.A.; Curtis, P.D.; Shanahan, J.E. Education programs for reducing American black bear-human conflict: Indicators of success? Ursus 2006, 17, 75-80.
    • 51. Merkle, J.A.; Krausman, P.R.; Booth, M.M. Behavioral and attitudinal change of residents exposed to human-bear interactions. Ursus 2011, 22, 74-83.
    • 52. Baruch-Mordo, S.; Breck, S.W.; Wilson, K.R.; Broderick, J. The carrot or the stick? Evaluation of education and enforcement as management tools for human-wildlife conflicts. PloS One 2011, 6, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015681.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok