LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Graham-Matheson, L.; Starr, S. (2013)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Journal: Research in Learning Technology
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB2300, assessment, Education, higher education; plagiarism; assessment; Turnitin, Turnitin, plagiarism, higher education, learning technology, L
Plagiarism is a growing problem for universities, many of which are turning to software detection for help in detecting and dealing with it. This paper explores issues around plagiarism and reports on a study of the use of Turnitin in a new university. The purpose of the study was to inform the senior management team about the plagiarism policy and the use of Turnitin. The study found that staff and students largely understood the university’s policy and Turnitin’s place within it, and were very supportive of the use of Turnitin in originality checking. Students who had not used Turnitin were generally keen to do so. The recommendation to the senior management team, which was implemented, was that the use of Turnitin for originality checking should be made compulsory where possible – at the time of the study the use of Turnitin was at the discretion of programme directors. A further aim of the study was to contribute to the sector’s body of knowledge. Prevention of plagiarism through education is a theme identified by Badge and Scott (2009) who conclude an area lacking in research is “investigation of the impact of these tools on staff teaching practices”. Although a number of recent studies have considered educational use of Turnitin they focus on individual programmes or subject areas rather than institutions as a whole and the relationship with policy.Keywords: higher education; plagiarism; assessment; Turnitin(Published: 29 April 2013)Citation: Research in Learning Technology 2013, 21: 17218 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17218
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abasi, A. R. & Graves, B. (2008) 'Academic literacy and plagiarism: conversations with international graduate students and disciplinary professors', Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 221 233.
    • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P. & Thorne, P. (1997) 'Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 187 203.
    • Badge, J. & Scott, J. (2009) 'Dealing with plagiarism in the digital age', [online] Available at: http://evidencenet.pbworks.com/Dealing-with-plagiarism-in-the-digital-age
    • Barrett, D. (2011) 'The epidemic at Britain's universities', The Daily Telegraph, 5 March, [online] Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8363345/Thecheating-epidemic-at-Britains-universities.html
    • Barrett, R. & Malcolm, J. (2006) 'Embedding plagiarism education in the assessment process', International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38 45.
    • Barrie, J. (2008) 'Emerging educational practices for more original writing', Paper presented at the Third International Plagiarism Conference, Gateshead.
    • Blackboard. (2008) 'Blackboard's SafeAssign (TM) used for one million student papers', [online] Available at: http://reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS127286 19-May-2008 MW20080519
    • Carroll, J. (2007) A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education, 2nd edn, Oxford Centre for Learning and Staff Development, Oxford.
    • Crisp, G. T. (2007) 'Staff attitudes to dealing with plagiarism: issues and perspectives from one Australian university', International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 3 15.
    • Culwin, F. (2006a) 'An active introduction to academic misconduct and the measured demographics of misconduct', Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 167 182.
    • Culwin, F. (2006b) 'I think my students are less naughty, but maybe the tools are more effective', Second International Plagiarism Conference, Gateshead, [online] Available at: http://www.plagiarismadvice.org/research-papers/category/2009
    • Dahl, S. (2007) 'Turnitin: the student perspective on using plagiarism detection software', Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 173 191.
    • Davis, M. & Carroll, J. (2009) 'Formative feedback within plagiarism education: is there a role for text-matching software'? International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 58 70, [online] Available at: www.ojs.unisa.edu.au/index.php/IJEI/article/view/614
    • de Jager, K. & Brown, C. (2010) 'The tangled web: investigating academics' views of plagiarism at the University of Cape Town', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 513 528.
    • Devlin, M. (2006) 'Policy, preparation and prevention: proactive minimisation of student plagiarism', Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 45 58.
    • Eckel, E. J. (2010) 'A reflection on Plagiarism, Patchwriting and the Engineering Master's Thesis', Issues and Science and Technology Librarianship, [online] Available at: http:// www.istl.org/10-summer/viewpoint.html
    • Flynn, S. (2010) 'Using Turnitin with large classes to support student writing', Paper presented to the Fourth International Plagiarism Conference, June 2010, [online] Available at: http:// www.plagiarismadvice.org/documents/conference2010/papers/4IPC_0016_final.pdf
    • Hayes, N. & Introna, L. (2005) 'Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: when plagiarism gets in the way of learning', Ethics and Behavior, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 213 231.
    • Howard, R. M. (1999) Standing in the Shadow of Giants: Plagiarists, Authors, Collaborators, Ablex, Stamford, CT.
    • iParadigms. (2012) 'Turnitin celebrates 20 million graded papers in Grademark', [online] Available at: http://www.iparadigms.com/news
    • Larkham, P. J. & Manns, S. (2002) 'Plagiarism and its treatment in higher education', Journal of Further and Higher Education, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 341 349.
    • Ledwith, A. & Rasquez, A. (2008) 'Using anti-plagiarism software to promote academic honesty in the context of peer reviewed assignments', Studies in Higher Education, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 371 384.
    • Mainka, C., Raeburn, S. & Earl, S. (2006) 'A UK institution's university-wide approach to plagiarism: first results and recommendations', International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13 25.
    • Maloney, M. & O'Kane, C. (2007) Using Turnitin in a large class, unpublished, cited in Flynn Martin, I., Stubbs, M. & Troop, H. (2006) 'Weapons of mouse destruction: a 3D strategy for combating cut-and-paste plagiarism using the JISC plagiarism advisory service', Paper presented at the 2nd International Plagiarism Conference, Gateshead, [online] Available at: http://www.plagiarismadvice.org/media/2006papers/IanMartin.pdf
    • McCarthy, G. & Rogerson, A. (2009) 'Links are not enough: using originality reports to improve academic standards, compliance and learning outcomes among postgraduate students', International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 47 57.
    • McGowan, U. (2005) 'Educational integrity: a strategic approach to anti-plagiarism', 2nd AsiaPacific Educational Integrity Conference, University of Newcastle, Australia http:// www.newcastle.edu.au/conference/apeic/papers_pdf/mcgowan_0548_edd.pdf
    • Mulcahy, S. & Goodacre, C. (2004) 'Opening Pandora's box of academic integrity: using plagiarism detection software', in Beyond the Comfort Zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, eds R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips, Perth, Australia: ASCILITE. pp. 688 696.
    • Pecorari, D. (2003) 'Good and original: plagiarism and patchwriting in academic secondlanguage writing', Journal of Second Language Writing, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 317 345.
    • Pecorari, D. & Shaw, M. (2010) 'University teachers discussing plagiarism: divided perspectives on teaching writing and shaping a culture of honesty', Paper presented at the 4th Plagiarism Conference, 4 6 June 2010, Northumbria University, [online] Available at: http://www.plagiarismadvice.org/conference/previous-plagiarism-conferences/4th-plagiarismconference-2010
    • Rolfe, V. (2011) 'Can Turnitin be used to provide instant formative feedback?', British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 701 710.
    • Sutherland-Smith, W. & Carr, R. (2005) 'Turnitin.com: teachers perspectives of anti-plagiarism software in raising issues of educational integrity', Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 2, no. 3, [online] Available at: http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol2/ iss3/10/
    • Tennant, P., Rowell, G. & Duggan, F. (2007) Academic Misconduct Benchmarking Research Project: Part 1: The range and spread of penalties available for student plagiarism among UK Higher Education Institutions, Higher Education Academy, York, [online] Available at: http://www.jiscpas.ac.uk/AMBeR/index
    • Wiggins, C. (2010) 'Turning points: building a framework for active student engagement and learning with Turnitin', Paper presented to the Fourth International Plagiarism Conference, Northumbria University, [online] Available at: http://www.plagiarismadvice. org/conference/previous-plagiarism-conferences/4th-plagiarism-conference-2010
    • Woessner, M. (2004) 'Beating the house: how inadequate penalties for cheating make plagiarism an excellent gamble', PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 313 320.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article