Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Darty , Kevin; Sabouret , Nicolas (2012)
Publisher: AAAI
Languages: English
Types: Conference object
Subjects: Programing Model, Affective Computing, [ INFO.INFO-AI ] Computer Science [cs]/Artificial Intelligence [cs.AI], AI Problem Solving
International audience; In this paper, we present a programming paradigm for AI problem solving based on computational concepts drawn from Affective Computing. It is believed that emotions participate in human adaptability and reactivity, in behaviour selection and in complex and dynamic environments. We propose to define a mechanism inspired from this observation for general AI problem solving. To this purpose, we synthesize emotions as programming abstractions that represent the perception of the environment's state w.r.t. predefined heuristics such as goal distance, action capability, etc. We first describe the general architecture of this "emotion-oriented" programming model. We define the vocabulary that allows programmers to describe the problem to be solved (i.e. the environment), and the action selection function based on emotion abstractions (i.e. the agent's behaviours). We then present the runtime algorithm that builds emotions out of the environment, stores them in the agent's memory, and selects behaviours accordingly. We present the implementation of a classical labyrinth problem solver in this model. We show that the solutions obtained by this easy-to-implement emotion-oriented program are of good quality while having a reduced computational cost.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, J.; Bothell, D.; Byrne, M.; Douglass, S.; Lebiere, C.; and Qin, Y. 2004. An integrated theory of the mind.
    • Psychological review 111(4):1036.
    • Antos, D., and Pfeffer, A. 2011. Using emotions to enhance decision-making. In Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
    • Barrett, L. F. 2006. Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and social psychology review 10(1):20.
    • Batra, R., and Holbrook, M. 1990. Developing a typology of affective responses to advertising. Psychology and Marketing 7(1):11-25.
    • Baumeister, R. F.; Vohs, K. D.; DeWall, C. N.; and Zhang, L. 2007. How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology review 11:167-203.
    • Darwin, C.; Ekman, P.; and Prodger, P. 2002. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Oxford University Press, USA.
    • De Melo, C.; Gratch, J.; Antos, D.; and Carnevale, P. 2011.
    • de Melo, C.; Zheng, L.; and Gratch, J. 2009. Expression of moral emotions in cooperating agents. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, 301-307. Springer.
    • Gebhard, P. 1996. Alma: A layered model of affect. International Conference On Autonomous Agent 29-39.
    • Gigerenzer, G., and Brighton, H. 2009. Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(1):107-143.
    • Hoffmann, J. 2001. Ff: The fast-forward planning system.
    • AI magazine 22(3):57.
    • James, W.; Burkhardt, F.; and Skrupskelis, I. 1981. The principles of psychology, volume 1. Harvard Univ Pr.
    • Lazarus, R. 1991. Emotion and adaptation. In Handbook of personality: Theory and Research. Oxford University Press.
    • Lisetti, C., and Gmytrasiewicz, P. 2002. Can a rational agent afford to be affectless? a formal approach. Applied Artificial Intelligence 16(7-8):577-609.
    • Loewenstein, G., and Lerner, J. 2003. The role of affect in decision making. Handbook of affective science 619:642.
    • Mehrabian, A. 1996. Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology 14(4):261- 292.
    • Miller, G. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.
    • Psychological review 63(2):81.
    • Minsky, M. 2006. The emotion machine: commensense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. Simon and Schuster.
    • Ortony, A.; Clore, G.; and Collins, A. 1990. The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge Univ Pr.
    • Roseman, I. 1996. Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory.
    • Cognition & Emotion 10(3):241-278.
    • Scherer, K.; Wallbott, H.; and Summerfield, A. 1986. Experiencing emotion: A cross-cultural study. Cambridge University Press; Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
    • Scheutz, M. 2002. Agents with or without emotions. In Proceedings FLAIRS, volume 2, 89-94.
    • Sutton, R., and Barto, A. 1998. Reinforcement learning: An introduction. The MIT press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article