LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Daniel Berrar; Naoyuki Sato; Alfons Schuster (2010)
Publisher: Hindawi Limited
Journal: Advances in Artificial Intelligence
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Electronic computers. Computer science, Article Subject, QA75.5-76.95
Since its conception in the mid 1950s, artificial intelligence with its great ambition to understand and emulate intelligence in natural and artificial environments alike is now a truly multidisciplinary field that reaches out and is inspired by a great diversity of other fields. Rapid advances in research and technology in various fields have created environments into which artificial intelligence could embed itself naturally and comfortably. Neuroscience with its desire to understand nervous systems of biological organisms and systems biology with its longing to comprehend, holistically, the multitude of complex interactions in biological systems are two such fields. They target ideals artificial intelligence has dreamt about for a long time including the computer simulation of an entire biological brain or the creation of new life forms from manipulations of cellular and genetic information in the laboratory. The scope for artificial intelligence in neuroscience and systems biology is extremely wide. This article investigates the standing of artificial intelligence in relation to neuroscience and systems biology and provides an outlook at new and exciting challenges for artificial intelligence in these fields. These challenges include, but are not necessarily limited to, the ability to learn from other projects and to be inventive, to understand the potential and exploit novel computing paradigms and environments, to specify and adhere to stringent standards and robust statistical frameworks, to be integrative, and to embrace openness principles.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Dubitzky, W., Azuaje, F., Dubitzky, W., Azuaje, F.. Preface. Artificial Intelligence Methods and Tools for Systems Biology. 2004: 221
    • Pfeifer, R., Scheier, C.. Understanding Intelligence. 2000
    • Negnevitsky, M.. Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems. 2004
    • Brighton, H., Selina, H.. Introducing Artificial Intelligence. 2003
    • Iagnemma, K., Buehler, M.. Editorial for Journal of Field Robotics—special issue on the DARPA grand challenge. Journal of Field Robotics. 2006; 23 (9): 655-656
    • Marmanis, H., Babenko, D.. Algorithms of the Intelligent Web. 2009
    • Millington, I.. Artificial Intelligence for Games. 2006
    • Kelly, S., Schuster, A.. Application of a fuzzy controller on a lego mindstorms robot. : 200-203
    • Duch, W., Mandziuk, J.. Quo vadis, computational intelligence?. Machine Intelligence: Quo Vadis? Advances in Fuzzy Systems Applications and Theory. 2004: 3-28
    • Lebedev, M. A., Nicolelis, M. A. L.. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends in Neurosciences. 2006; 29 (9): 536-546
    • Girimonte, D., Izzo, D., Schuster, A.. Artificial intelligence for space applications. Intelligent Computing Everywhere. 2007: 235-243
    • Purves, D., Augustine, G. J., Fitzpatrick, D.. Neuroscience. 2004
    • Kitano, H.. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science. 2002; 295 (5560): 1662-1664
    • Lander, E. S., Linton, L. M., Birren, B.. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 2001; 409 (6822): 860-921
    • Venter, J. C., Adams, M. D., Myers, E. W.. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001; 291 (5507): 1304-1351
    • Rasmussen, S., Chen, L., Deamer, D.. Transitions from nonliving to living matter. Science. 2004; 303 (5660): 963-965
    • Holmes, B.. Alive!. New Scientist. 2005; 185 (2486): 28-33
    • Ainsworth, C.. The facts of life. New Scientist. 2003; 178 (2397): 28-31
    • Schuster, A., Liu, J., Cheung, Y. M., Yin, H.. DNA algorithms for rough set analysis. ; 2690: 498-513
    • Schuster, A.. DNA algorithms for Petri net modeling. Informatica. 2008; 32 (4): 421-427
    • Turing, A. M.. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 1952; 237 (641): 37-72
    • Kitano, H.. Towards a theory of biological robustness. Molecular Systems Biology. 2007; 3, article 137
    • Kitano, H.. Cancer as a robust system: implications for anticancer therapy. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2004; 4 (3): 227-235
    • Schuster, A.. Robust Intelligent Systems. 2008
    • Adami, C.. Digital genetics: unravelling the genetic basis of evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2006; 7 (2): 109-118
    • Schuster, A., Schuster, A.. Robustness in nature as a design principle for artificial intelligence. Robust Intelligent Systems. 2008: 173-197
    • Voit, E., Schwacke, J., Konopka, A.. Understanding through modeling: a historical perspective and review of biochemical systems theory as a powerful tool for systems biology. Handbook of Systems Biology: Principles, Methods, and Concepts. 2007: 27-82
    • Turing, A. M.. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind. 1950; 59: 433-460
    • Harel, D.. A Turing-like test for biological modeling. Nature Biotechnology. 2005; 23 (4): 495-496
    • Saha, D., Mukherjee, A.. Pervasive computing: a paradigm for the 21st century. Computer. 2003; 36 (3): 25-31
    • Kephart, J. O., Chess, D. M.. The vision of autonomic computing. Computer. 2003; 36 (1): 41-50
    • Sato, N., Yamaguchi, Y.. Computational model-based prediction of human episodic memory performance based on eye movements. IEICE Transactions on Communications. 2008; 91B (7): 2142-2143
    • Barabási, A.-L., Bonabeau, E.. Scale-free networks. Scientific American. 2003; 288 (5): 60-69
    • Potter, S. M., Lungarella, M., Bongard, J., Pfeifer, R.. What can artificial intelligence get from neuroscience?. Artificial Intelligence Festschrift: The Next 50 Years. 2007: 174-185
    • Luck, M., Aylett, R.. Applying artificial intelligence to virtual reality: intelligent virtual environments. Applied Artificial Intelligence. 2000; 14 (1): 3-32
    • Huw Arnall, A.. Future technologies, today's choices—nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and robotics: a technical, political and institutional map of emerging technologies. 2003
    • Sgarbas, K. N., Papatheodorou, T., Christodoulakis, D., Karanikolas, N.. The road to quantum artificial intelligence. Current Trends in Informatics. 2007; A: 469-477
    • Kak, S., Schuster, A.. Quantum mechanics and articial intelligence. Intelligent Computing Everywhere. 2007: 81-101
    • Rodriguez, L., Jiang, H., Stark, K., Bell, S., Kortenkamp, D.. Validation of heuristic techniques for design of life support systems.
    • Izzo, D., Pettazzi, L.. Autonomous and distributed motion planning for satellite swarm. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 2007; 30 (2): 449-459
    • Paun, G., Ciobanu, G., Perez-Jimenez, M. J., Paun, G.. Introduction to membrane computing. Applications of Membrane Computing. 2006: 1-42
    • Arbib, M. A.. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. 2003
    • Santhanam, G., Ryu, S. I., Yu, B. M., Afshar, A., Shenoy, K. V.. A high-performance brain-computer interface. Nature. 2006; 442 (7099): 195-198
    • Hochberg, L. R., Serruya, M. D., Friehs, G. M.. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006; 442 (7099): 164-171
    • Roberta, F.. Reverse engineering the brain. Biomedical Computation Review. 2009; 5 (2): 10-17
    • Albus, J. S., Bekey, G. A., Holland, J. H.. A proposal for a decade of the mind initiative. Science. 2007; 317 (5843): 1321
    • Bakkum, D. J., Gamblen, P. M., Ben-Ary, G., Chao, Z. C., Potter, S. M.. Meart: the semi-living artist. Frontiers in NeuroRobotics. 2007; 1 (5)
    • Saigusa, T., Tero, A., Nakagaki, T., Kuramoto, Y.. Amoebae anticipate periodic events. Physical Review Letters. 2008; 100 (1)-4
    • Tagkopoulos, I., Liu, Y.-C., Tavazoie, S.. Predictive behavior within microbial genetic networks. Science. 2008; 320 (5881): 1313-1317
    • Miller, M. B., Bassler, B. L.. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2001; 55: 165-199
    • Brazma, A., Krestyaninova, M., Sarkans, U.. Standards for systems biology. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2006; 7 (8): 593-605
    • Hucka, M., Finney, A., Sauro, H. M.. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19 (4): 524-531
    • Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., Brown, P. O.. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 1995; 270 (5235): 467-470
    • Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J.. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)—toward standards for microarray data. Nature Genetics. 2001; 29 (4): 365-371
    • Dubitzky, W., Granzow, M., Berrar, D.. Fundamentals of Data Mining in Genomics and Proteomics. 2007
    • Troester, M. A., Millikan, R. C., Perou, C. M.. Microarrays and epidemiology: ensuring the impact and accessibility of research findings. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2009; 18 (1): 1-4
    • Goodacre, R., Broadhurst, D., Smilde, A. K.. Proposed minimum reporting standards for data analysis in metabolomics. Metabolomics. 2007; 3 (3): 231-241
    • Savage, L.. Forensic bioinformatician aims to solve mysteries of biomarker studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2008; 100 (14): 983-987
    • Khan, J., Wei, J. S., Ringnér, M.. Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks. Nature Medicine. 2001; 7 (6): 673-679
    • Quackenbush, J., Salzberg, S. L.. It is time to end the patenting of software. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22 (12): 1416-1417
    • Eysenbach, G.. Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology. 2006; 4 (5, article e157)
    • Baggerly, K. A., Coombes, K. R., Neeley, E. S.. Run batch effects potentially compromise the usefulness of genomic signatures for ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2008; 26 (7): 1186-1187
    • Gil, Y., Deelman, E., Blythe, J., Kesselman, C., Tangmunarunkit, H.. Artificial intelligence and grids: workflow planning and beyond. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2004; 19 (1): 26-33
    • Natarajan, J., Berrar, D., Dubitzky, W.. Text mining of full-text journal articles combined with gene expression analysis reveals a relationship between sphingosine-1-phosphate and invasiveness of a glioblastoma cell line. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006; 7, article 373
    • Fidler, I. J.. The organ microenvironment and cancer metastasis. Differentiation. 2002; 70 (9-10): 498-505
    • Taylor, I., Smith, P.. The nature of the creative process. Creativity: An Examination of the Creative Process. 1959: 51-82
    • Kryssanov, V. V., Tamaki, H., Kitamura, S.. Understanding design fundamentals: how synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering. 2001; 15 (4): 329-342
    • Mandelbrot, B. B.. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. 1982
    • Boden, M. A.. Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence. 1998; 103 (1-2): 347-356
    • Koestler, A.. The Act of Creation. 1964
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article