LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dinh TRAN NGOC HUY (2013)
Publisher: Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence
Journal: Network Intelligence Studies
Types: Article
Subjects: Market manipulation, Board structure, HF5001-6182, Business, Corporate governance standards, Board structure, Code of best practice, Financial crisis, Corporate scandals, Market manipulation, Internal audit, Corporate governance standards, Code of best practice, Financial crisis, Internal audit, Corporate scandals
jel: jel:G30
After the recent global crisis, corporate scandals and bankruptcy in US and Europe, there is some certain evidence on weak auditing, risk management, accounting and audit system. This paper chooses a different analytical approach and among its aims is to give some systematic opinions on corporate governance criteria as a benchmark for stock markets. Firstly, it classifies limited Western European representative corporate governance (CG) standards into two (2) groups: The Netherlands and Belgium latest CG principles covered in group 1 and, group 2, including corporate governance principles from Italy and Austria, so-called relative good CG group, while it uses OECD and ICGN principles as reference. Secondly, it identifies through analysis the differences and advantages between the above set of standards which are and have been used as reference principles for many relevant organizations. Third, it establishes a selected comparative set of standards for Western European representative corporate governance system in accordance to international standards. Last but not least, this paper covers some ideas and policy suggestions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Allen, F., and Gale, D., (1992), Stock Price Manipulation, Review of Financial Studies
    • [2] Bellouma, Meryem., (2012), Governance Mechanisms and Buyer Supplier Relationship in Tunisian Exporting SMEs, International Journal of Corporate Governance
    • [3] Campa, Domenico., and Donnelly, Ray., (2013), Board Structure and Monitoring Effects in Different Institutional Settings: A Comparison between Italy and the UK, International Journal of Corporate Governance
    • [4] Dallas, Lynne., (2011), Short-Termism, The Financial Crisis and Corporate Governance, Journal of Corporation Law
    • [5] Essen, Marc., Engelen, Peter., and Carney, Michael., (2013), Does “Good” Corporate Governance Help in A Crisis? The Impact of Country and Firm Level Governance Mechanisms in the European Financial Crisis, Corporate Governance: An International Review
    • [6] IFRs and US GAPP, Deloitte, 2007.
    • [7] Khwaja, Asim Ijaz., Mian, Atif., (2005), Unchecked intermediaries:Price manipulation in an emerging stock market, Journal of Financial Economics 78 (2005) 243-241
    • [8] Niu, Flora., (20008), Director Cash Compensation, Ownership Structure and Director Pay for Performance, International Journal of Corporate Governance
    • [9] OECD Corporate Governance Guidelines, OECD, 1999
    • [10] www.iasplus.com
    • [11] www.cbc.to
    • [12] www.cii.org/corp_govenance.asp
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article