Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Castro, Cornélia; Andrade, António (2011)
Publisher: ICERI
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: chemistry, 97C70, education, engagement, student-generated content, social learning environment, Computer Science - Other Computer Science, web 2.0, cognitive tools, F.2.2

Classified by OpenAIRE into

The Portuguese Technological Plan for Education (TPE) was established to modernize schools and to consolidate the role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in order to promote the academic success of students and allow schools to be transformed into technological enhanced environments through a significant learning and knowledge building in a participatory, collaborative and sharing logic. With this work we aimed to establish dynamical interactions students-content-teacher in order to overcome a diagnosed students’ lack of effort towards studying curriculum chemistry content. Our methodology design is a non experimental and descriptive one, carried out in a secondary school during a whole school year, in order to answer the question “How to improve the engagement of K-12 students in chemistry classes?”. Students, gathered in small groups, were asked to create digital learning resources (DLR) during classes. The teacher assumed the role of the supervisor, coacher and facilitator of every task that had to be taken or chosen by the students. To enhance interaction student-student and student-teacher, a Twitter account and a Ning community were created for the class. Both supported the Social Learning Environment (SLE) that was intended to be created. The data collected – DLR created, participation of each student in the Ning community, teacher observations and students’ opinions – led us to satisfactory results in what concerns the goals of this exploratory study. We based our research in the following facts: i) the development of a technological basis in education is a social demand and therefore its adoption in a systemic way is no longer a matter of choice; ii) our “digital native” students have different learning styles not considered by traditional instructional practices; iii) SLE promotes and supports collaborative learning through the use of student-created content; iv) involving innovative pedagogical approaches opens up opportunities to engage students in creative learning and can possibly help bridge gaps between innovative and conventional pedagogical approaches and v) the use of well-structured technology, in certain contexts, may have a significant and positive effect on students’ achievements. SLE has been shaped by experience and this study is about that: web 2.0 tools, social media and student-generated content were used to answer to a combination of curriculum very specific skills and the needs and desires of the students. The affordances and constraints of SLE as an open architecture that has potential to facilitate collaborative learning are delineated. The methodology followed out allowed an interaction from many to many and an increased students’ engagement in the proposed tasks. SLE developed ICT skills and established itself as a cognitive tool: students accessed information about learning content and turned it into knowledge. The results seem to demonstrate that TPE, by allowing the ubiquity of computers in schools, let students to be more engaged in working and came out to be a facilitator for integrating ICT in the curriculum. Our findings are important for the Portuguese teachers who still withstand, before these “Net Generation” students, to experimenting pedagogical approaches that integrate ICT into real teaching contexts which is now an imperative cause. Future work should focus on mechanisms that allow assessment both of the methodology used and the students’ generated content in order to improve students’ learning in this environment.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On The Horizon, 9(5), pp. 1-6.
    • White, D. (2008). TALL blog. Online education with the University of Oxford. Retrieved on the 12th March 2011 from http://tallblog.conted.ox.ac.uk/index.php/2008/07/.
    • Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L. (2008). The Digital Natives' Debate: A Critical Review of the Evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, pp. 775-786. doi:10.1111/j.1467- -8535.2007.00793.x.
    • Alves, J. M. (2000). O primeiro de todos os ofícios. 1.ª ed.. Porto: ASA.
    • Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching Digital Natives. Partnering for Real Learning. CORWIN. SAGE.
    • Martins, I., Costa, J. A. L., Lopes, J. M. G., Simões, M. O., Claro, P. R. & Simões, T. S. (2004).
    • Programa de Química 12.o Ano. Ministério da Educação. Retrieved on the 16th August 2004 from http://www.esffl.pt/documentos/programas/Quimica12.pdf.
    • Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R. & Stone, S. (2010). The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved on the 02nd March 2010 from http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2010/.
    • Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating Strategies Used to Incorporate Technology Into Preservice Education: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), pp. 383-408.
    • Balanskat, A., Blamire, R. & Kefala, S. (2006). ICT Impact Report - A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. European Commission, Ed.. European Communities: European Schoolnet. Retrieved on the 01st November 2009 from http://ec.europa.eu/education/pdf/doc254_en.pdf.
    • [10] Casulleras, R. P., Lagarón, D. C. & Rodríguez, M. I. H., (2010). An inquiry-oriented approach for making the best use of ICT in the classroom. eLearning Papers, 20, pp. 1-14.
    • [11] Jonassen, D. H. (2005). Modelling with Technology: Mindtools for Conceptual Change. Prentice Hall, Ed., 3.ª ed..
    • [12] Cross, J. (2007). Informal Learning. Rediscovering the Natural Pathways that Inspire Innovation and Performance. J. Wiley & Sons, Ed.. Pfeiffer.
    • [13] Cann, A., Dimitriou, K. & Hooley, T. (2011). Social Media: A guide for researchers. Leicester, UK: Research Information Network. Retrieved on the 14th April 2011 from www.rin.ac.uk/socialmedia-guide.
    • [14] Lorenzo, G., Oblinger, D. & Dziuban, C. (2006). How Choice, Co-Creation and Culture Are Changing What It Means to Be Net Savvy. EDUCAUSE, ELI Paper, 4, October 2006.
    • [15] Redecker, C., Mutka, K. A., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A. & Punie, Y. (2009). Learning 2.0: The Impact of Web 2.0 Innovations on Education and Training in Europe. Luxembourg: European Communities. doi: 10.2791/33043. Retrieved on the 28th February 2010 from http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/publications/pub.cfm?id=3099
    • [16] Sampieri, R. H., Collado, C. H., & Lucio P. B. (2006). Metodologia de Pesquisa (Vol. 3). Colombia: McGraw Hill.
    • [17] Vilelas, J. (2009). Investigação. O Processo de Construção do Conhecimento (Vol. 1). Lisboa: Edições Sílabo.
    • [18] Silva, R. & Andrade, A. (2009). Development of a Web Application for Management of Learning Styles. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 15(7), pp. 1508-1525.
    • [19] Plano Tecnológico (n. d.), Programa e-escola [online], http://www.planotecnologico.pt/InnerPage.aspx?idCat=71&idMasterCat=30&idLang=1&idConte nt=1521&idLayout=4&site=planotecnologico
    • [20] Go!Animate (n. d.) [online], http://goanimate.com/movie/056ty9_P1Z5g?utm_source=embed
    • [21] Vimeo (n. d.) [online], http://vimeo.com/12132693
    • [22] Helmstedt, C. & Ehlers, U. D. (2010). CONtent Creation Excellence through Dialogue in Education D3.1 Concede Quality Framework. EFQUEL & European Commission. Retrieved on the 09th September 2011 from www.concede.cc/wpcontent/uploads/2011/05/D3_1_CONCEDE_QUALITY_FRAMEWORK_12052011.pdf
    • [23] Casa das Ciências (s. d.). [online]. http://www.casadasciencias.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=3860&Ite mid=23&limitstart=5
    • [24] FCG (s.d.). Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, [online]. http://www.gulbenkian.pt/historia
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article