Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Samir Okasha; John A. Weymark; Walter Bossert (2013)
Types: Article
Subjects: Hamilton’s rule, inclusive fitness, kin selection, rational choice., /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/pubmedpublicationtype/D016428, /dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/pubmedpublicationtype/D013485, Hamilton’s Rule, inclusive fitness, kin selection, rational choice, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Kin selection theorists argue that evolution in social contexts will lead organisms to behave as if maximizing their inclusive, as opposed to personal, fitness. The inclusive fitness concept allows biologists to treat organisms as akin to rational agents seeking to maximize a utility function. Here we develop this idea and place it on a firm footing by employing a standard decision-theoretic methodology. We show how the principle of inclusive fitness maximization and a related principle of quasi-inclusive fitness maximization can be derived from axioms on an individual’s ‘as if preferences’ (binary choices). Our results help integrate evolutionary theory and rational choice theory, help draw out the behavioural implications of inclusive fitness maximization, and point to a possible way in which evolution could lead organisms to implement it.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Blackwell, D. A., Girshick, M. A., 1954. Theory of Games and Statistical Decisions. Wiley, New York.
    • Bossert, W., Qi, C. X., Weymark, J. A., 2013a. Extensive social choice and the measurement of group fitness in biological hierarchies. Biol. Phil. 28, 75-98.
    • Bossert, W., Qi, C. X., Weymark, J. A., 2013b. Measuring group fitness in a biological hierarchy: An axiomatic social choice approach. Econ. Phil., forthcoming.
    • Bossert, W., Weymark, J. A., 2004. Utility in social choice. In: Barbera`, S., Hammond, P. J., Seidl, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory. Volume 2: Extensions. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 1099-1177.
    • Darwin, C., 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
    • d'Aspremont, C., 1985. Axioms for social welfare orderings. In: Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D., Sonnenschein, H. (Eds.), Social Goals and Social Organizations: Essays in Memory of Elisha S. Pazner. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 19-76.
    • Dugatkin, L. A., 2007. Inclusive fitness theory from Darwin to Hamilton. Genetics 176, 1375-1380.
    • Fisher, R. A., 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
    • Frank, S. A., 1998. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
    • Gardner, A., West, S. A., Wild, G., 2011. The genetical theory of kin selection. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 1020-1043.
    • Grafen, A., 2006. Optimization of inclusive fitness. J. Theor. Biol 238, 541- 563.
    • Grafen, A., 2009. Formalizing Darwinism and inclusive fitness theory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 3135-3141.
    • Haldane, J. B. S., 1932. The Causes of Evolution. Longmans Green, London.
    • Haldane, J. B. S., 1955. Population genetics. In: Johnson, M. L., Abercrombie, M., Fogg, G. E. (Eds.), New Biology 18. Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK, pp. 34-51.
    • Hamilton, W. D., 1963. The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am. Nat. 97, 354-356.
    • Hamilton, W. D., 1964a. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1-16.
    • Hamilton, W. D., 1964b. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 17-52.
    • McElreath, R., Boyd, R., 2007. Mathematical Models of Social Evolution: A Guide for the Perplexed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    • Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., Wilson, E. O., 2010. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057-1062.
    • Okasha, S., 2009. Individuals, groups, fitness and utility: Multi-level selection meets social choice theory. Biol. Philos. 24, 561-584.
    • Wagner, G. P., 2010. The measurement theory of fitness. Evolution 64, 1358- Récents cahiers de recherche du CIREQ Recent Working Papers of CIREQ 08-2012 09-2012 10-2012 11-2012 12-2012 13-2012 14-2012 15-2012 16-2012 17-2012 18-2012 19-2012 Bossert, W., H. Peters, "Single-Basined Choice", juin 2013, 15 pages
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects


Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok