Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mansour , Sadok (2007)
Publisher: HAL CCSD
Languages: French
Types: Conference object
Subjects: [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, [ SHS.GESTION ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, rationalité, Décision,Jugement,rationalité,Heuristiques, Jugement, Heuristiques, Décision
International audience; Le thème de la décision en situation d'incertitude a été abordé par les recherches en audit en utilisant des approches normatives et descriptives issues des mathématiques et des Sciences économiques. Nous expliquons l'apport en audit des recherches en psychologie de la décision menées par Kahneman et Tversky.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Beach, LR, Barnes, V.E. & Christensen Szalanski, J.J.J. “Beyond heuristics and biases: a contingency model of judgmental forecasting”, Journal of forecasting (1986) PP 143 - 157.
    • Brown, C. (1983) “Effects of dynamic task environment on the learning of standard cost variance significance”. Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 413-431.
    • Brown, C., & Solomon, I. (1990). “Auditor configural information processing in control risk assessment”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9, 17-38.
    • Chapman, L. J., & Chapman, ]. P. “Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1969,74,271-280. (1,15,17)
    • Cohen, J., Chesnick, E. I., & Haran, D. “A confirmation of the inertial effect in sequential choice and decision”. British Journal of Psychology, 1972,63,41-46. (1)
    • Demski, J.S. & Swieringa, R.J, “Discussion of behavioural decision theory : Process of judgment and choice” , journal of accounting research (1981) PP 32-41.
    • Edward J. Joyce and Gary C. Biddle. “ Anchoring and Adjustment in Probabilistic Inference in Auditing”. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 19 N° 1, Spring 1981.
    • Edward J. Joyce and Gary C. Biddle. “ Are Auditors Judgments Sufficiently Regressive”. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 19 N° 2, Autumn 1981.
    • Gaumnitz, B.R., Nunamaker, T.R., Surdick, J.J., & Thomas, M.F. (1982). “Auditor consensus in internaI control evaluation and audit program planning”. Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 745-755.
    • Gibbins, M. “Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting”, Journal of Accounting Research (1984), PP 103-125.
    • Hamilton, R.E., & Wright, W.F. (1982). “Internal control judgments and effects of experience: Replications and extensions”. Journal of Accounting Research, 20, 756-765.
    • Joyce, E.J. (1976). “Expert judgment in audit program planning”. Journal of Accounting Research, 14 (Supplement), 29-60.
    • Kahneman, D, & Tversky, A. “On the psychology of prediction”. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 237- Kahneman, D., & Tversky , A. “ Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness.” Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, PP 430-454.
    • Kahneman, D., & Tversky , A. “Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk.” Econometrica, 1979, 47, PP 263-291.
    • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. “Intuitive prediction-: Biases and corrective procedures.” TIMS Studies in Management Science, 1979, 12, PP 313-327.
    • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. “On prediction and judgment.” ORI Research Monograph,1972, 12(4).
    • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. NY: Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
    • Lesage C. « Proposition d'un modèle linguistique d'évaluation du risque d'audit », Comptabilité, Contrôle, Audit, Tome 5, Volume 2, Septembre 1999.
    • McKean, K. “Decisions, decisions, decisions”, Discover (1985) PP. 22-31 Meixner, W.F., & Welker, R.B. (1988).“Judgment consensus and auditor experience: An examination of organizational relations”. The Accounting Review, 63, 505-513.
    • Messier, W.F. (1983). “The effect of experience and firm type on materiality / disclosure judgments”. Journal of Accounting Reseach, 21, 611-618.
    • Schneider, A. (1984). “Modeling external auditors' evaluations of internal auditing”. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 657-678.
    • Schneider, A. (1985). “The reliance of external auditors on the internal audit function”. Journal of Accounting Research, 23 , 911-919.
    • Shanteau, J “ Cognitive Heuristics and biases in behavioural auditing : Review, comments and observations” Accounting, Organization and Society (1989), PP 165-177.
    • Simon Herbert A [1991a], Organizations and Markets, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, number 2, Spring 1991, pp. 25-44.
    • Simon Herbert A. [1947], Administrative Behavior. A study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, traduction française par Pierre-Emmanuel Dauzat, 1983, Economica.
    • Simon Herbert A. [1955], A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, pp. 99-118.
    • Simon Herbert A. [1959], Theories of Decision-Making in economics and Behavioral Science, American EconomicReview, 49, n° 1, pp. 253-283.
    • Simon Herbert A. [1963b], Problems of Methodology Discussion, American Economic Review, 53, n° 1, pp. 229-231.
    • Simon Herbert A. [1969/1996], The Sciences of The Artificial, Les références citées dans le texte renvoient à la traduction de la troisième édition réalisée par Jean-Louis Le Moigne, Editions Gallimard, 2004.
    • Simon Herbert A. [1976], From Substantive to Procedural Rationality, in Latsis ed., Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge University Press, pp. 129-148.
    • Simon Herbert A. [1978b], On how to decide what to do, The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, n° 2, pp. 494- Simon Herbert A. [1997], Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason, vol. 3, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
    • Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. “Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment”. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1971,6,649-744. (1,3,4,23, 28)
    • Speaking Minds: Interviews with Twenty Eminent Cognitive Scientists, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, pp. 231-248.
    • Srinidhi, B.N., & Vasarhelyi, M.A. (1986). “Auditor judgment concerning establishment of substantive tests based on internal Control reliability”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 5, 64-76.
    • Tabor, R.H. (1983). “Internal control evaluations and audit program revisions: some additional evidence”. Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 348-354.
    • Trotman, K.T., & Wood, R. (1991). “A meta-analysis of studies on internal control judgments”. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 180-192.
    • Trotman, K.T., & Yetton, P.W. (1985). “The effect of the review process on auditor judgments”. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 256-267.
    • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. “Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability”. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, PP 207-232.
    • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. “The belief in the law of small numbers.” Psychological Bulletin, 1971, PP 105-110.
    • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. “The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice”. Science, 1981, PP 453-458.
    • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. “Causal schemas in judgments under uncertainty”. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1980,
    • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases”, Science.1974, 185,1124-1131.
    • Wallsten, T.S. The theoretical status of judgmental heuristics, in R.W. Scholz (ed.) Decision making under uncertainty (Amsterdam : North Holland, 1983).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.
Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok