Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mackintosh, Nicola; Rance, Susanna; Carter, Wendy; Sandall, Jane (2017)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Obstetric complications, Patient safety, Research Article, Help seeking, Obstetric emergency, Maternity care, User involvement, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2729, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Early warning signs, Safety work
Background\ud \ud Women and their relatives can play an important role in early detection and help seeking for acute perinatal events. Recent UK reports indicate that patient-professional partnership in ‘working for safety’ can be difficult to achieve in practice, sometimes with catastrophic consequences. This research explored the experiences of women and relatives who had experienced early warning signs about their condition and sought help in escalating care.\ud Methods\ud \ud Secondary analysis of case study data which included qualitative interviews with 22 women purposively sampled on account of experiencing a step up in care and 4 of their relatives from two NHS Trusts in England during 2010. Analysis focused on the type of safety work participants engaged in, and the opportunities and challenges reported by women and family members when negotiating safety at home and in hospital.\ud Results\ud \ud Women and relatives took on a dual responsibility for self-diagnosis, self-care and seeking triage, whilst trying to avoid overburdening stretched services. Being informed, however, did not necessarily enable engagement from staff and services. The women’s narratives highlighted the work that they engaged in to build a case for clinical attention, the negotiations that took place with health care professionals and the strategies women and partners drew on (such as objective signs and symptoms, use of verbal insistence and repetition) to secure clinical help. For some women, the events left them with a lasting feeling that their concerns had been disregarded. Some described a sense of betrayal and loss of trust in an institution they believed had failed to care for them.\ud Conclusion\ud \ud The notion of ‘safety partnerships’ which suggests a sense of equality and reciprocity was not borne out by our data, especially with regards to the experiences of teenage women. To enable women and families to secure a rapid response in clinical emergencies, strategies need to move beyond the provision of patient information about warning signs. Effective partnerships for safety may be supported by system level change such as improved triage, continuity of care, self-referral pathways and staff training to address asymmetries of power that persist within the health system.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. CMACE. Saving Mothers' Lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer:2006-08. The Eighth Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG. 2011;118:1-203.
    • 2. Kirkup B. The Report of the Morecambe Bay Investigation. London: Stationery Office; 2015.
    • 3. MBRACE: Knight M, Tuffnell D, Kenyon S, Shakespeare J, Gray R, Kurinczuk J. (Eds.) on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers' Care - Surveillance of maternal deaths in the UK 2011-13 and lessons learned to inform maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009-13. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2015.
    • 4. Gerdik C, Vallish RO, Miles K, Godwin SA, Wludyka PS, Panni MK. Successful implementation of a family and patient activated rapid response team in an adult level 1 trauma center. Resuscitation. 2010;81(12):1676-81.
    • 5. World Health Organisation (WHO). Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks. Copenhagen: WHO; 2013.
    • 6. Schwappach DL. Review: Engaging Patients as Vigilant Partners in Safety A Systematic Review. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(2):119-48.
    • 7. Renedo A, Marston C. Developing patient-centred care: an ethnographic study of patient perceptions and influence on quality improvement. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):122.
    • 8. Sutton E, Eborall H, Martin G. Patient Involvement in Patient Safety: Current experiences, insights from the wider literature, promising opportunities? Public Manag Rev. 2014;17(1):72-89.
    • 9. Johnstone M-J, Kanitsaki O. Engaging patients as safety partners: Some considerations for ensuring a culturally and linguistically appropriate approach. Health Policy. 2009;90(1):1-7.
    • 10. Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. “This does my head in”. Ethnographic study of selfmanagement by people with diabetes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):1.
    • 11. Llanwarne N, Newbould J, Burt J, Campbell JL, Roland M. Wasting the doctor's time? A video-elicitation interview study with patients in primary care. Social Science & Medicine. 2017;176:113-22.
    • 12. Hrisos S, Thomson RG. Seeing It from Both Sides: Do Approaches to Involving Patients in Improving Their Safety Risk Damaging the Trust between Patients and Healthcare Professionals? An Interview Study. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e80759.
    • 13. Entwistle VA, McCaughan D, Watt IS, Birks Y, Hall J, Peat M, et al. Speaking up about safety concerns: multi-setting qualitative study of patients' views and experiences. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):1-7.
    • 14. Peat M, Entwistle V, Hall J, Birks Y, Golder S. Scoping review and approach to appraisal of interventions intended to involve patients in patient safety. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(Suppl 1):17-25.
    • 15. Doherty C, Stavropoulou C. Patients' willingness and ability to participate actively in the reduction of clinical errors: A systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(2):257-63.
    • 16. Davis RE, Sevdalis N, Jacklin R, Vincent CA. An Examination of Opportunities for the Active Patient in Improving Patient Safety. J Patient Safety. 2012;8(1):36-43.
    • 17. S-y H, Godbold N, Collier A, Iedema R. Finding the patient in patient safety. Health. 2013;17(6):567-83.
    • 18. MBRACE, Manktelow BM, Smith LK, Evans TA, Hyman-Taylor P, Kurinczuk JJ, Field DJ, Smith PW, Draper ES, on behalf of the MBRRACE-UK collaboration. Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report UK Perinatal Deaths for births from January to December 2013. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester. p. 2015.
    • 19. Heaton J. Secondary data analysis. In: The AZ of Social Research. London: Sage; 2003. p. 285-8.
    • 20. Carter W. “I was just…all alone by myself”. An exploration of teenage mothers' experiences and perceptions of quality and safety of care when there are complications in labour. London: King's College London; 2010.
    • 21. Mackintosh N, Rainey H, Sandall J. Understanding how rapid response systems may improve safety for the acutely ill patient: Learning from the frontline. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2011;21(2):135-44.
    • 22. Mackintosh N, Watson K, Rance S, Sandall J. Value of a modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) in managing maternal complications in the peripartum period: an ethnographic study. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2013;23(1):26-34.
    • 23. Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2015;42(5):533-44.
    • 24. Freshwater D, Holloway I. Narrative research. The Research Process in Nursing. 2010:188-98.
    • 25. Greenhalgh T, Russell J, Swinglehurst D. Narrative methods in quality improvement research. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2005;14(6):443-9.
    • 26. Dixon-Woods M. Why is patient safety so hard? A selective review of ethnographic studies. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(suppl_1):11-6.
    • 27. Ocloo JE. Harmed patients gaining voice: Challenging dominant perspectives in the construction of medical harm and patient safety reforms. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(3):510-6.
    • 28. Entwistle VA. Differing perspectives on patient involvement in patient safety. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2007;16(2):82-3.
    • 29. Dixon-Woods M, Suokas A, Pitchforth E, Tarrant C. An ethnographic study of classifying and accounting for risk at the sharp end of medical wards. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(3):362-9.
    • 30. Lupton D. The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health. 2013;11:256-70.
    • 31. Lupton D, Pedersen S. An Australian survey of women's use of pregnancy and parenting apps. Women and Birth. 2016;29:368-75.
    • 32. Koteyko N, Hunt D, Gunter B. Expectations in the field of the Internet and health: an analysis of claims about social networking sites in clinical literature. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2015;37(3):468-84.
    • 33. Lagan BM, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. What Is the Impact of the Internet on Decision-Making in Pregnancy? A Global Study Birth. 2011;38(4):336-45.
    • 34. Farrant K, Heazell AE. Online information for women and their families regarding reduced fetal movements is of variable quality, readability and accountability. Midwifery. 2016;34:72-8.
    • 35. Kirkham M. Midwives and information-giving during labour. In: Robinson S., Thomson A.M. (eds) Midwives, Research and Childbirth. Springer: MA; 1989.
    • 36. Stewart M. 'I'm just going to wash you down': sanitizing the vaginal examination. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(6):587-94.
    • 37. Birthrights. UK Supreme Court upholds women's autonomy in childbirth: Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board2015. Available from: http://www. birthrights.org.uk/2015/03/uk-supreme-court-upholds-womens-autonomyin-childbirth-montgomery-v-lanarkshire-health-board/
    • 38. Strauss AL, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C. Social Organisation of Medical Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1985.
    • 39. Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, Annandale E, Arthur A, Harvey J, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):35.
    • 40. Mackintosh N, Sandall J. Overcoming gendered and professional hierarchies in order to facilitate escalation of care in emergency situations: The role of standardised communication protocols. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(9):1683-6.
    • 41. Stewart J. To call or not to call: a judgement of risk by pre-registration house officers. Med Educ. 2008;42(9):938-44.
    • 42. Davis R, Kountanji M, Vincent C. How willing are patients to question health staff on issues related to the quality and safety of their health? An exploratory study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:90-6.
    • 43. Aveling E-L, Parker M, Dixon-Woods M. What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study. Soc Health Illness. 2015;38:216-32.
    • 44. Pilnick A, Dingwall R. On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor/patient interaction: A critical review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(8):1374-82.
    • 45. Bloor MJ, Horobin GW. Conflict and conflict resolution in doctor/patient interactions. A sociology of medical practice. London: Collier-MacMillan; 1975. p. 271-84.
    • 46. Greenhalgh T, Snow R, Ryan S, Rees S, Salisbury H. Six 'biases' against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine. BMC Med. 2015;13:200.
    • 47. Stacey M. The power of lay knowledge. Res People's Health. 1994:85-98.
    • 48. West E. Organisational sources of safety and danger: sociological contributions to the study of adverse events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2000;9:120-6.
    • 49. Vaughan D. The Dark Side of Organizations: Mistake, Misconduct, and Disaster. Annu Rev Sociol. 1999;25:271-305.
    • 50. Silbey SS. Taming Prometheus: Talk About Safety and Culture. Annu Rev Sociol. 2009;35(1):341-69.
    • 51. Ocloo J, Matthews R. From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;
    • 52. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, Ellwood D, Erwich JJ, Coory M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet. 2016;
    • 53. Reid B, Taylor J. A feminist exploration of Traveller women's experiences of maternity care in the Republic of Ireland. Midwifery. 2007;23(3):248-59.
    • 54. Mulherin K, Miller YD, Barlow FK, Diedrichs PC, Thompson R. Weight stigma in maternity care: women's experiences and care providers' attitudes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):19.
    • 55. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The Mistreatment of Women during Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847.
    • 56. NHS Quest. NHS Safety Thermometer: Maternity Dashboard. 2016.
    • 57. Rance S, McCourt C, Rayment J, Mackintosh N, Carter W, Watson K, et al. Women's safety alerts in maternity care: is speaking up enough? BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:348-55.
    • 58. Beck CT. Birth trauma: in the eye of the beholder. Nurs Res. 2004;53:28-35.
    • 59. Binder P, Johnsdotter S, Essén B. Conceptualising the prevention of adverse obstetric outcomes among immigrants using the 'three delays' framework in a high-income context. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(11):2028-36.
    • 60. Sandall, J., Coxon, K., Mackintosh, N., Rayment-Jones, H., Locock, L. Page, L. (writing on behalf of the Sheila Kitzinger symposium) Relationships: the pathway to safe, high-quality maternity care Report from the Sheila Kitzinger symposium at Green Templeton College October 2015. Green Templeton College, Oxford. 2016.
    • 61. Freeman, G., Woloshynowych, M., Baker, R., Boulton, M., Guthrie, B., Car, J., Haggerty, J., & Tarrant, C. 'Continuity of care: what have we learned since 2000 and what are policy imperatives now?' National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO). 2007.
    • 62. Finlay S, Sandall J. “Someone's rooting for you”: Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(8):1228-35.
    • 63. Rayment-Jones H, Murrells T, Sandall J. An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data-a retrospective, observational study. Midwifery. 2015;31(4):409-17.
    • 64. NHS England. National Maternity Review. Better Births. Improving Outcomes of Maternity Services in England. London: NHS England; 2016.
    • 65. The Scottish Government. The Best Start: A Five-Year Forward Plan for Maternity and Neonatal Care in Scotland, Jan 2017. Edinburgh, The Scottish Government
    • 66. The World Health Organisation 'WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience'. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
    • 67. NHSE 'Friends and Family Test' https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/pe/fft/. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • 68. NHSE 'Safety thermometer' https://www.safetythermometer.nhs.uk/. Accessed 15 June 2016.
    • 69. Bourke G. Support overdue: women's experiences of maternity services. In: NCT and the national federation of Women's institutes (NFWI); 2013.
    • 70. Reed R, Sharman R, Inglis C. Women's descriptions of childbirth trauma relating to care provider actions and interactions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):21.
    • 71. Cooper M. Towards a model of safety culture. Saf Sci. 2000;36(2):111-36.
    • 72. Entwistle VA, Mello MM, Brennan TA. Advising Patients About Patient Safety: Current Initiatives Risk Shifting Responsibility. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005;31:483-94.
    • 73. Heijnders M, Van Der Meij S. The fight against stigma: An overview of stigma-reduction strategies and interventions. Psychol Health Med. 2006;11(3):353-63.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article