LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Golec de Zavala, Agnieszka; Cichocka, Aleksandra; Eidelson, Roy; Jayawickreme, Nuwan (2009)
Publisher: American Psychological Association
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF
Identifiers:doi:10.1037/a0016904
This paper introduces the concept of collective narcissism - an emotional investment in an \ud unrealistic belief about the in-group’s greatness – aiming to explain how feelings about an ingroup shape a tendency to aggress against out-groups. The results of 5 studies indicate that \ud collective, but not individual, narcissism predicts inter-group aggressiveness. Collective \ud narcissism is related to high private and low public collective self esteem and low implicit \ud group esteem. It predicts perceived threat from out-groups, unwillingness to forgive outgroups and preference for military aggression over and above social dominance orientation, \ud right wing authoritarianism, and blind patriotism. The relationship between collective \ud narcissism and aggressiveness is mediated by perceived threat from out-groups and perceived \ud insult to the in-group. In sum, the results indicate that collective narcissism is a form of high \ud but ambivalent group esteem related to sensitivity to threats to the in-group’s image and \ud retaliatory aggression.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
    • Sedikides, C., Rudich, E.A., Gregg, A. P., Kumashiro, M., & Rusbult, C. (2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy?: Self- esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 400-416.
    • Sidanius, J., Feshbach, S., Levin, S. & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance? Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 103-133.
    • Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Sidanius J., Pratto, F., van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social Dominance Theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845-880.
    • Silvan-Ferrero, M., & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptación de la escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social al castellano: validación de la Dominancia Grupal y la Oposición a la Igualdad como factores subyacentes. [Castillan adaptation of the Social Dominance Orientation Scale: validation of the group-based dominance and opposition to equality as underlying factors]. Revista de Psicología Social, 22, 3-16.
    • Simms, L. J., & Watson, D. (2007). The construct validation approach to personality scale construction. In R. Robins, C. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.). Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology. Guilford Press.
    • Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Struch, N., & Schwartz, S.H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from in-group bias. Journal of Personally and Social Psychology, 56(3), 364-373.
    • Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways. New York: Ginn.
    • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chigago: Nelson-Hall.
    • Vaknin, S. (2003). Narcissistic leaders and corporate narcissism. Internet resources: managernewz.com/managernewz-21- 0030203NarcissisticLeadersandCorporateNarcissism.html. derived 12.07.2007.
    • Viroli, M. (1995). For love of country: An essay on patriotism and nationalism. Oxford: Clarendon.
    • Warren, M. & Capponi, A. (1996). The role of culture in the development of narcissistic personality disorders in American, Japan and Denmark. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 20, 77-82.
    • Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T.Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126.
    • Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Leyens, J.-Ph., & Paladino, P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257-295.
    • Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (Eds.). (2004). The psychology of group perception. Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism. London: Psychology Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article