LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pinto, Carlos Eduardo; da Silva, Adriana; Duran Cordeiro, Guaraci; Alves-dos-Santos, Isabel (2015)
Publisher: Pensoft Publishers
Types: Article
Subjects: Tetrapedia, cell provisions, Solitary bee, Arthropoda, morphometry, Tetrapedia diversipesAnimalia, Animalia, Apidae, parental investment, trap nest, Solitary bee morphometry cell provisions parental investment trap nest, Hymenoptera, Insecta, Apoidea

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: fungi, behavior and behavior mechanisms
The body size of bees can affect their fitness in many ways. There is an indirect relationship between the size of the mother and the size of her progeny. This is so because large mothers use larger nests and brood cells and have higher foraging capacity than small mothers, and consequently large mothers supply a larger amount of food to their larvae, which grow larger. We analyzed the relationship between body size of individual oil-collecting bees of the species Tetrapedia diversipes and the size of their brood cells from Boracéia and Ilhabela, southeastern Brazil. In addition, we manipulated 26 brood cells of a population at the campus of Universidade de São Paulo by removing food from 13 brood cells. In this case, we checked the relationship between the body size of these bees and the amount of food consumed. We measured 241 individuals: 135 males and 106 females. No significant size difference was found between males and females. Only a weak relationship between body size and brood cell volume was detected, possibly due to the low variation in both female size and brood cell size. In the food manipulation experiment, the unmanipulated individuals were larger than individuals for whom part of the provisions were removed but no correlation was found between amount of food removed and offspring size.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alcock J (1995) Body size and its efect on male-male competition in Hylaeus alcyoneus (Hymenoptera: Colletidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 8: 149-159. doi: 10.1007/BF01988901
    • Alcock J (1999) eTh nesting behavior of Dawson's burrowing bee, Amegilla dawsoni (Hymenoptera: Anthophorini), and the production of osfpring of diefrent sizes. Journal of Insect Behavior 12: 363-384. doi: 10.1023/A:1020843606530
    • Alves dos Santos I, Machado IC, Gaglianone MC (2007) História natural das Abelhas coletoras de óleo. Oecologia Brasilienses 11: 544-557.
    • Alves dos Santos I, Melo GAR, Rozen JG (2002) Biology and Immature Stages of the Bee Tribe Tetrapediini (Hymenoptera: Apidae). American Museum Novitates 3377: 1-45. doi: 10.1206/0003-0082(2002)377<0001:BAISOT>2.0.CO;2
    • Amssalu B, Nuru N, Radlof SE, Hepburn HR (2004) Multivariate morphometric analysis of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ethiopian region. Apidologie 35: 71-81. doi: 10.1051/ apido:2003066
    • Araújo ED, Costa M, Chaud-Netto J, Fowler HG (2004) Body size and flight distance in stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini): inference of flight range and possible eco - logical implications. Brazilian Journal of Biology 64: 563-568. doi: 10.1590/S1519- 69842004000400003
    • Boomsma JJ, Eickwort GC (1993) Colony structure, provisioning and sex allocation in the sweat bee Halictus ligatus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48: 355-377. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb02097.x
    • Bosch J, Vicens N (2002) Body size as an estimator of production costs in a solitary bee. Ecological Entomology 27: 129-137. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00406.x
    • Borsuk G, Olszewski K (2010) Morphometric traits of Buckfast and Caucasian bees. Journal of Apicultural Science 54: 43-48.
    • Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? The Quar - terly Review of Biology 75: 385-407. doi: 10.1086/393620
    • Buckle GR (1982) Diferentiation of queens and nestmate interactions in newly established colonies of Lasioglossum zephyrum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Sociobiology 7: 8-20.
    • Bullock SH (1999) Relationships among Body Size, Wing Size and Mass in Bees from a Tropical Dry Forest in Mexico. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 72: 426-439.
    • Camillo E (2000) Biologia de quatro espécies de Tetrapedia em ninhos armadilha (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Tetrapediini). Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto.
    • Cordeiro GD (2009) Abelhas solitárias nidificantes em ninhos-armadilha em quatro áreas de Mata Atlântica do Estado de São Paulo. Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto.
    • Danforth BN (1990) Provisioning behavior and the estimation of investment ratios in a solitary bee, Calliopsis (Hypomacrotera) persimilis (Cockerell) (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 27: 159-168. doi: 10.1007/BF00180299
    • Garófalo CA, Martins CF, Alves dos Santos I (2004) eTh Brazilian solitary bee species caught in trap nests. International Workshop on solitary bees and their role in pollination, Beberibe, CE. Solitary Bees: conservation, rearing and management for pollination. Impresa Universitária, Fortaleza, 77-84.
    • Johnson MD (1990) Female size and fecundity in the small carpenter bee, Ceratina calcarata (Robertson) (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 63: 414-419.
    • Kamm DR (1974) Efects of temperature, day length, and number of adults on the sizes of cells and ofspring in a primitively social bee (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 47: 8-18.
    • Klostermeyer EC, Mech SJ Jr, Rasmussen WB (1973) Sex and weight of Megachile rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) progeny associated with provision weights. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 46: 536-548.
    • Krombein KV (1967) Trap-Nesting Wasps and Bees. Smithsonian Press, Washington (DC).
    • Michener CD, Lange RB (1958) Observations on the ethology of neotropical Anthophorine bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 39: 69-96.
    • Neves CML (2012) Nidificação, recursos polínicos e caracterização morfométrica de Tetrapedia diversipes KLUG, 1810 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) no Recôncavo da Bahia. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Cruz das Almas.
    • O'Neill KM, Pearce AM, O'Neill RP, Miller RS (2010) Ofspring size and sex ratio variation in a feral population of alfalfa leafcutting bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Annals of hTe Entomological Society of America 103: 775-784. doi: 10.1603/AN09183
    • Peterson JH, Roitberg BD (2006) Impact of resource levels on sex ratio and resource allocation in the solitary bee, Megachile rotundata. Environmental Entomology 35: 1404-1410. doi: 10.1093/ee/35.5.1404
    • R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
    • Ribeiro MF (1994) Growth in bumble bee larvae: relation between development time, mass, and amount of pollen ingested. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72: 1978-1985. doi: 10.1139/z94-270
    • Rooijakkers EF, Sommeijer MJ (2009) gender specific brood cells in the solitary bee Colletes halophilus (Hymenoptera; Colletidae). Journal of Insect Behaviour 22: 492-500. doi: 10.1007/s10905-009-9188-x
    • Roulston TH, Cane JH (2000) The efect of diet breadth and nesting ecology on body size variation in bees (Apiformes). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 73: 129-142.
    • Seidelmann K (2014) Optimal progeny body size in a solitary bee, Osmia bicornis (Apoidea: Megachilidae). Ecological Entomology 39: 656-663. doi: 10.1111/een.12145
    • Tengo J, Baur B (1993) Number and size of oocytes in relation to body size and time of day in the kleptoparasitic bee Nomada lathburiana (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). Entomologia Generalist 18: 19-24.
    • Tepedino VJ, Torchio PF (1989) Influence of nest hole selection on sex ratio and progeny size in Osmia lignaria propinqua (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 82: 355-360. doi: 10.1093/aesa/82.3.355
    • Tepedino VJ, Torchio PF (1982) Phenotypic variability in nesting success among Osmia lignaria propinqua females in a glasshouse environment (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Ecological Entomology 7: 453-462. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1982.tb00688.x
    • Tepedino VJ, Thompson R, Torchio PF (1984) Heritability for size in the megachilid bee Osmia lignaria propinqua. Apidologie 15: 83-88. doi: 10.1051/apido:19840108
    • Bees measures that emerged in seven brood cell with 0.8 cm diameter
    • Copyright notice: This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from