Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Uwe Cantner; Maximilian Goethner; Andreas Meder (2007)
Publisher: Universität Jena und Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik Jena
Types: Research
Subjects: Innovation, Technologie, Deutschland, Prior knowledge, Erfolgsfaktor, Entrepreneurship, O31, Networks, L25, Wissen, Entrepreneurship, Networks, Prior knowledge, Z13, Unternehmensgründung
jel: jel:Z13, jel:L25, jel:O31
This paper is concerned with the relationship between innovative success of entrepreneurs and their prior knowledge at the stage of firm formation. We distinguish between different kinds of experience an entrepreneur can possess and find evidence that the innovative success subsequent to firm formation is enhanced by entrepreneur’s prior technological knowledge but not by prior market and organizational knowledge. Moreover we find that prior technological knowledge gathered through embeddedness within a research community has an additionally positive influence on post start-up innovative success. This is a first hint towards the importance of collective innovation activities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Braunerhjelm, P. & Carlsson, B. (2005), 'The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship', Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy. MPI Jena.
    • Acs, Z., L., A. & Varga, A. (2002), 'Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge', Research Policy 31(7), 1069-1085.
    • Agarwal, R. & Bayus, B. (2005), Here today but gone tomorrow: The dissipating advantage of pre-entry experience in a technologically dynamic industry, Technical report, College of Business University of Illinois.
    • Aldrich, H. E. & Martinez, M. A. (2001), 'Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship', Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 25(4), 41-56.
    • Allen, R. (1983), 'Collective invention', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 4, 1-24.
    • Asheim, B. & Coenen, L. (2005), 'Knowledge bases and regional innnovation systems: Comparing nordic clusters', Research Policy 34, 1173-1190.
    • Balconi, M., Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. (2004), 'Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of italian patent data', Research Policy 33(1), 127-145.
    • Belderbos, R., Carree, M. & Lokshin, B. (2004), 'Cooperative R&D and firm performance', Research Policy 33(10), 1477-1492.
    • Borgatti, S., Everett, M. & Freeman, L. (2002), Ucinet 6 for Windows., Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
    • Bruederl, J. & Preisendoerfer, P. (1998), 'Network support and the success of newly founded businesses', Small Business Economics 10, 213-225.
    • Buenstorf, G. (2006), 'Perception and pursuit of entrepreneurial opportunities: An evolutionary economics perspective', Papers on Economics & Evolution. MPI Jena.
    • Burt, R. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Havard University Press: Cambridge.
    • Butts, C. (2006), Tools for social network analysis, Technical report.
    • Cantner, U. & Graf, H. (2004), 'Cooperation and specialization in German technology regions', Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(5), 543-562.
    • Cantner, U. & Graf, H. (2006), 'The network of innovators in jena: An application of social network analysis', Research Policy 35(4), 463- 480.
    • Carroll, G., Bigelow, L., Seidel, M. & Tsai, L. (1996), 'The fates of denovo and de alio producers in the american automobile industry 1885-1981', Strategic Management Journal 17, 117-137.
    • Casson, M. (1982), The Entrepreneur, Barnes&Noble Books: New Jersey.
    • Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D. (1990), 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 128-152.
    • Coleman, J. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Havard University Press: Cambridge.
    • Combs, J. & Ketchen, D. (1999), 'Explaning interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a recounciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics', Strategic Management Journal 20, 867-888.
    • Cowan, R. (2004), 'Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion', MERIT - Infonomicus Research Memorandum Series.
    • Cowan, R. & Jonard, N. (1999), 'Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge', Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 28(8), 1557-1575.
    • Dahl, M. & Reichstein, T. (2005), Are you experienced? prior experience and the survival of new organizations, number 05-1 in 'DRUID Working Paper'.
    • Dasgupta, P. & David, P. (1994), 'Toward a new economics of science', Research Policy 23(5), 487-521.
    • Doloreux, D., Bitard, P. & Hommen, L. (2004), 'Identifying regional innovation systems in a globalising economy'.
    • Dunne, T., Roberts, M. & Samuelson, L. (1988), 'Patterns of firm entry and exit in u.s. manufacturing industries', RAND Journal of Economics 19, 495-515.
    • Elfring, T. & Hulsink, W. (2003), 'Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms', Small Business Economics 21(4), 409-422.
    • Encaoua, D., Guellec, D. & Martinez, C. (2006), 'Patent systems for encouraging innovation: Lessons from economic analysis', Research Policy 35(9), 1423-1440.
    • Fritsch, M. & Franke, G. (2004), 'Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation', Research Policy 33(2), 245-255.
    • Granovetter, M. (1973), 'The strength of weak ties', American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360-1380.
    • Griliches, Z. (1990), 'Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey', Journal of Economic Literature 28, 1661-1707.
    • Hannan, M. & Freeman, J. (1986), 'Where do organizational forms come from?', Sociological Forum 1, 50-57.
    • Hayek, F. (1945), 'The use of knowledge in society', American Economic Review 35(4), 519-530.
    • Helfat, C. & Lieberman, M. (2002), 'The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history', Industrial and Corporate Change 11(4), 725-760.
    • Hills, G., Lumpkin, G. & Singh, R. (1997), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College, chapter Opportunity Recognition: Perceptions and Behaviors of Entrepreneurs, p. 330344.
    • Kakati, M. (2003), 'Success criteria in high-tech new ventures', Technovation 23(5), 447-457.
    • Kirzner, I. (1997), 'Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: An austrian approach', Journal of Economic Literature 35, 60-85.
    • Klepper, S. (2001), 'Employee startups in high tech industries', Industrial and Corporate Change 10, 639-674.
    • Klepper, S. & Simons, K. (2000), 'Dominance by birthright: Entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the u.s. television receiver industry', Strategic Management Journal 21, 997-1016.
    • Klepper, S. & Sleeper, S. (2005), 'Entry by spinoffs', Management Science 51, 1291-1306.
    • Koppl, R. & Minniti, M. (2003), Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, Kluwer: Boston, chapter Market Process and Entrepreneurial Studies, pp. 81-102.
    • Morone, P. & Taylor, R. (2004), 'Knowledge diffusions dynamics and network properties of face-to-face interactions', Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14, 327-351.
    • Pavitt, K. (1991), 'What makes basic research economically useful?', Research Policy 20, 109-119.
    • Ronstadt, R. (1988), 'The corridor principle', Journal of Business Venturing 3, 31-40.
    • Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Havard University Press: Havard.
    • Shane, S. (2000), 'Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities', Organization Science 11(4), 448-469.
    • Shane, S. (2004), Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA.
    • Shane, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2000), 'The promis of entrepreneurship as a field of research', Academy of Management Review 25-1, 217- 226.
    • Shepherd, D. & DeTienne, D. (2005), 'Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and opportunity identification', Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 29(1), 91-112.
    • Sorenson, O. (2003), 'Social networks and industrial geography', Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13, 513-527.
    • Taylor, R. & Morone, P. (2005), 'Innovation, networks and proximity: an applied evolutionary model', (Emaee Utrecht 2005).
    • Teece, D. (1986), 'Profiting from technological innovation: Implication for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy', Research Policy 15, 285-305.
    • Terza, J. (2006), 'Optimal discrete prediction in parametric binary response models', Economics letters 91, 72-75.
    • Thompson, P. (2005), 'Selection and firm survival: Evidence from the shipbuilding industry 1825-1914', Review of Economics and Statistics 87, 26-36.
    • Venkataraman, S. (1997), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth, JAI Press: Greenwich, chapter The Distinctive Domain of Entrepreneurship Research, pp. 119-138.
    • Watts, D. & Strogatz, S. (1998), 'Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks', Nature 393, 440-442.
    • Westhead, P. & Wright, M. (1998), 'Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs: Are they different?', Journal of Business Venturing 13, 173-204.
    • Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M. & Binks, M. (2005), 'Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions', Small Business Economics 25(2), 109-132.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article