OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Henrekson, Magnus; Waldenström, Daniel (2014)
Publisher: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN) Stockholm
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Ekonomisk historia, D31, H20, Economic History, Entrepreneurship, K34, Inheritance tax, Gift tax, Gift tax; Inheritance tax; Estate tax; Tax avoidance; Excess burden; Entre-preneurship; Ownership transfers of family firms, Ownership transfers of family firms, Excess burden, Tax avoidance, Estate tax, Gift tax; Inheritance tax; Estate tax; Tax avoidance; Excess burden; Entrepreneurship; Ownership transfers of family firms
jel: jel:D31, jel:H20, jel:K34
ddc: ddc:330
Identifiers:doi:10.1111/ehr.12280
This paper studies the evolution of Swedish inheritance taxation since the late nineteenth century to its abolition in 2004. Our contribution is twofold. First, we compute the annual effective inheritance tax rates for different sizes of bequests, if the inherited assets were family firm equity or not, accounting for all relevant exemptions, deductions and valuation discounts. Second, we attempt to explain changes in inheritance taxation over time. Ideology appears to be the main driver of the sharp tax increases of the 1930s through the 1960s. Wartime economies with higher pressures on the people induced politicians to raise inheritance taxes on the wealthy, primarily during the First World War. We also document increased opportunities for tax planning for the wealthy, most notably a series of tax cuts on inherited family firms in the 1970s. This rise in avoidance opportunities for the rich while middle-class heirs face growing inheritance tax rates undermined the legitimacy of the tax and led to its repeal.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Johansson, Anders L., and Lars Magnusson (1998). LO andra halvseklet. Fackföreningsrörelsen och samhället. Stockholm: Atlas.
    • Johansson, Sven-Erik (1963). “Arvs- och förmögenhetsskatt som företagsekonomiskt problem.” Skandinaviska Banken Kvartalsskrift, January, 14-18.
    • Johansson, Sven-Erik, and Jan Werding (1970). “Rate of Return Required in the Family Business with Reference to Growth and Capital Taxes.” Skandinaviska Banken Quarterly Review, January, 31-36.
    • Kopczuk, Woichiech (2013). “Taxation of Intergenerational Transfers and Wealth.” In Alan J. Auerbach, Raj Chetty, Martin S. Feldstein and Emmanuel Saez, eds., Handbook of Public Economics, Volume 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • Lindbeck, Assar (1997). “The Swedish Experiment.” Journal of Economic Literature 35(2), 1273-1319.
    • Lindkvist, Hans (1990). Kapitalemigration. Doctoral Dissertation in Business Administration. Stockholm School of Economics: Ekonomiska Forskningsinstitutet, EFI.
    • Lodin, Sven-Olof (2011). The Making of Tax Law. Uppsala and Amsterdam: Justus Förlag and International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD).
    • Ohlsson, Henry (2011).“The Legacy of the Swedish Gift and Inheritance Tax, 1884- 2004.” European Review of Economic History 15(3), 539-569.
    • Ohlsson, Henry, Jesper Roine and Daniel Waldenström (2014). “Inherited Wealth over the Path of Development: Sweden, 1810-2010.” IFN Working Paper No. 1033. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    • Peacock, Alan T., and Jack Wiseman (1961). The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • Piketty, Thomas (2011). “On the Long-Run Evolution of Inheritance: France 1820-2050.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(3), 1071-1131.
    • Piketty, Thomas, Gilles Postel-Vinay and Jean-Laurent Rosenthal (2013). “Inherited vs. SelfMade Wealth: Theory and Evidence from a Rentier Society (Paris 1872-1927).” Explorations in Economic History 51(1), 21-40.
    • Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez (2013), “A Theory of Optimal Inheritance Taxation.” Econometrica 81(5), 1851-1866.
    • Rodriguez, Enrique (1980). Offentlig inkomstexpansion: en analys av drivkrafterna bakom de offentliga inkomsternas utveckling i Sverige under 1900-talet. Malmö: Liber Läromedel.
    • Roine, Jesper, and Daniel Waldenström (2009). “Wealth Concentration over the Path of Development: Sweden, 1873-2006.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111(1), 151-187.
    • Roine, Jesper and Daniel Waldenström (2014). “Long-Run Trends in the Distribution of Income and Wealth.” Forthcoming in Anthony B. Atkinson and François Bourguignon, eds., Handbook of Income Distribution, Volume 2. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
    • Scheve, Kenneth and David Stasavage (2012). “Democracy, War, and Wealth: Lessons from Two Centuries of Inheritance Taxation.” American Political Science Review 106(1), 82- 102.
    • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: George Allen & Unwin.
    • SOU 1957:48. Arvsbeskattning. Betänkande av Arvsskattesakkunniga. Stockholm: Finansdepartementet.
    • SOU 2002:52. Beskattning av småföretagare, del II. Generationsskiften. Betänkande av 3:12- utredningen. Stockholm: Fritzes.
    • SOU 2004:36. Reformerade egendomsskatter. Stockholm: Fritzes.
    • SOU 2004:66. Egendomsskatter. Reform av arvs- och gåvoskatter. Slutbetänkande av Egendomsskattekommittén. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet/Fritzes.
    • Tulin, Lars (1984). “249 mkr till staten - inte ett öre till hennes arvingar.” Dagens Industri, November 20, p. 7.
    • Wigforss, Ernst (1928). Egendomsutjämning och arvsskatt. Stockholm: Tiden.
    • Wigforss, Ernst (1956). Efter välfärdsstaten. Malmö: Framtiden.
    • Indraneel Chakraborty, Hans A. Holter and Serhiy Stepanchuk, Marriage Stability, Taxation and Aggregate Labor Supply in the U.S. vs. Europe. 64 pp.
    • Karin Edmark och Roger Gordon, Taxes and the Choice of Organizational Form by Entrepreneurs in Sweden. 48 pp.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.
Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok