LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
van Herk, H.; Poortinga, Y.H.; Verhallen, T.M.M. (2004)
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

ACM Ref: ComputingMilieux_LEGALASPECTSOFCOMPUTING
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bachman, J.G. & O'Malley P.M. (1984). Yea-saying, nay-saying, and going to extremes: Black-white differences in response styles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 491-509.
    • Bagozzi, R.P & Yi Y. (1991). Multitrait-multimethod matrices in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(March), 426-439.
    • Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp J.B.E.M. (2001). Response styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 143- 156.
    • Bentler, P.M., Jackson D.N., & Messick S. (1971). Identification of content and style: A two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 76(3), 186-204.
    • Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y.H., Segall, M.H., Dasen, P.R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Broen, W.E., & Wirt R.D. (1958). Varieties in response sets. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 22(3), 237-240.
    • Campbell, D.T., & Fiske D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validity by the multitrait - multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
    • Chen, C., Lee S-Y., & Stevenson H.W. (1995). Response style and crosscultural comparisons of rating scales among east Asian and north American students. Psychological Science, 6(3), 170-175.
    • Cheung, G.W., & Rensvold R.B. (2000). Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equations modeling. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(2), 188-213.
    • Chinese Culture Connection (1987). Chinese values and the search for culturefree dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143-164.
    • Chun, K-T, Campbell J.B., & Yoo J.H. (1974). Extreme response style in crosscultural research. A reminder. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5(4), 465-480.
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Craig C.S., & Douglas S.P. (2000). International Marketing Research. Second Edition, New York: Wiley.
    • Crandall, J.E. (1982). Social interest, extreme response style, and implications for adjustment, Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 82-89.
    • Cronbach, L.J. (1946). Response sets and test validity, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 475-494.
    • Cronbach, L.J. (1950). Further evidence on response sets and test design,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 3-31.
    • Ellis, B.B., & Kimmel, H.D. (1992). Identification of unique cultural response patterns by means of item response theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 177-184.
    • Euromonitor (1994, 1997). Consumer Europe. London: Euromonitor International.
    • Fazio, R.H. (1986). How do Attitudes Guide Behavior? In: Handbook of Motivation and Cognition. Foundations of Social Behavior. R.M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), 204-243.
    • Forsman, L. (1993). Giving Extreme Responses to Items in Self-Esteem Scales: Response Set or Personality Trait? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9(1), 33-40.
    • Greenleaf, E.A. (1992a). Improving rating scale measures by detecting and correcting bias components in some response styles. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(2), 176-188.
    • Greenleaf, E.A. (1992b). Measuring extreme response style. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 176-188.
    • Grimm, S.D., & Church, A.T., (1999). A Cross-Cultural Study of Response Biases in Personality Measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 415-441.
    • Hamilton, D.L. (1968). Personality attributes associated with extreme response style. Psychological Bulletin, 69(3) , 192-203.
    • Hofstede, G.H. (1980). Culture's consequences International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
    • Hofstede, G.H. (2001). Culture's consequences comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Second Edition. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, California.
    • Hui, C.H., & Triandis H.C. (1985). The instability of response sets. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 253-260.
    • Hui, C.H., & Triandis H.C. (1989). Effects of culture and response format on extreme response style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20(3), 296-309.
    • Jackson D.N., & Messick S. (1958). Content and style in personality assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 243-252.
    • Johnson, T.P., & Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2003). Social desirability in crosscultural research. In: Cross-cultural survey research. J.A. Harkness, F.J.R. Van de Vijver, & P.Ph. Mohler (Eds.), 195-204.
    • Kahle, L.R. (1983). Social values and social change: Adaptation to life in America. New York: Praeger Publishers.
    • Knowles, E.S., & Nathan K.T. (1997). Acquiescent Responding in Self-Reports: Cognitive Style or Social Concern. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 293-301.
    • Lee, C & Green R.T. (1991). Cross-cultural examination of the Fishbein behavioral intentions model. Journal of International Business Studies, 2, 289-305.
    • Marín, G., Gamba R.J., & Marín B.V. (1992). ”Extreme response style and acquiescence among Hispanics. The role of acculturation and education. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23(4), December, 498-509.
    • Marsh H.W., & Byrne B.M. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis of multigroup-multi-method self-concept data: Between group and within-group variance constraints,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 313-349.
    • Messick, S. (1968). Response sets. In: D.L. Sills (Ed.) International encyclopedia of the social sciences, 492-496. New York: Macmillan.
    • Messick, S. (1991). Psychology and methodology of response styles. In: Improving inquiry in social science: A volume in honor of Lee J. Cronbach. Snow, R.E. and D.E. Wiley, 161-200.
    • Mick, D.G. (1996). Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(2), 106-119.
    • Paulhus, D.L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In: Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, Volume 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Inc.
    • Peterson, R.A, G. Albaum and R.F. Beltramini (1985), “A meta-analysis of effect sizes in consumer behavior experiments,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12(June), 97-103.
    • Ray, J.J. (1983). Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. The Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 81-96.
    • Schuman, H., & Presser S. (1996). Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.
    • Soueif, M.I. (1968). Extremeness, indifference and moderation response sets: a cross-cultural study. Acta Psychologica, 28, 63-75.
    • Steenkamp, J.B.E.M. & Baumgartner H. (1998). Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(June), 78-90.
    • Ten Berge, J.M.F. (1999). A legitimate case of component analysis of ipsative measures, and partialling the mean as an alternative to ipsatization. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(1), 89-102.
    • Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
    • Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
    • Tucker, L.R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section Report No. 984. Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
    • Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for crosscultural research. In: Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2nd Ed., Volume I. Theory and Method, Berry, J.W., Y.H. Poortinga and J. Pandey (Eds.), 257-300. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. : : : : g g g g
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok