Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hufflen, Jean-Michel (2006)
Publisher: HAL CCSD
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: [INFO.INFO-MO] Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation, [INFO.INFO-SE] Computer Science [cs]/Software Engineering [cs.SE]

Classified by OpenAIRE into

International audience; Using XML-like syntax for documents gives them a tree structure, inducing a notion of structured document. Defining domain-dependent tags introduces a notion of semantics-oriented writing. These two points result in a new view about document production. In fact, they have already existed within TeX, but in another shape. This article aims to point out these notions and the differences between them. It ends with some proposals about the evolution of the tools belonging to TeX's world.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Neil Bradley: The Concise sgml Compan8 eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations, the language of transformations used for xml texts.
    • 9 eXtensible Stylesheet Language - Formatting Objects: this language aims to describe high-quality print outputs. See [9] for an introduction, the official document being [13]. ion. Addison-Wesley. 1997.
    • [2] The Chicago Manual of Style. The University of Chicago Press. The 14th edition of a manual of style revised and expanded. 1993.
    • [3] Michel Goossens, Sebastian Rahtz, Eitan M. Gurari, Ross Moore and Robert S. Sutor: The LATEX Web Companion. Addison-Wesley Longmann, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts. May 1999.
    • [4] Hans Hagen: ConTEXt, the Manual. November 2001. http://www.pragma-ade.com/ general/manuals/cont-enp.pdf.
    • [5] Jean-Michel Hufflen: “MlBibTEX: beyond LATEX”. In: Apostolos Syropoulos, Karl Berry, Yannis Haralambous, Baden Hugues, Steven Peter and John Plaice, eds., International Conference on TEX, xml, and Digital Typography, Vol. 3130 of lncs, pp. 203-215. Springer, Xanthi, Greece. August 2004.
    • [6] International Standard iso/iec 10179:1996(e): dsssl. 1996.
    • [7] Leslie Lamport: LATEX. A Document Preparation System. User's Guide and Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts. 1994.
    • [8] Oren Patashnik: BibTEXing. February 1988. Part of BibTEX's distribution.
    • [9] Dave Pawson: xsl-fo. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. August 2002.
    • [10] Erik T. Ray: Learning xml. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. January 2001.
    • [11] Thomas Schraitle: DocBook-xml - Medienneutrales und plattformunabhändiges Publizieren. SuSE Press. 2004.
    • [12] W3C: xsl Transformations ( xslt). Version 1.0. w3c Recommendation. Edited by James Clark. November 1999. http://www.w3. org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116.
    • [13] W3C: Extensible Stylesheet Language ( xsl). Version 1.0. w3c Recommendation. Edited by James Clark. October 2001. http://www.w3. org/TR/2001/REC-xsl-20011015/.
    • [14] W3C: Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 2.0, 2nd edition. w3c Recommendation. Edited by David Carlisle, Patrick Ion, Robert Miner, and Nico Poppelier. October 2003. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/ REC-MathML2-20031021.
    • [15] Norman Walsh and Leonard Muellner: DocBook: The Definitive Guide. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. October 1999.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article