Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Publisher: Iconarp International Journal of Architecture Planning
Journal: Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: NA1-9428, Urban landscape, HT165.5-169.9, City planning, Landscape Architecture, Open-Green Areas, Urban, Urban Landscape, Urban Life, Landscape, Architecture
The issues of urban and urbanization emerged after the industrial revolution. Thus, cities that have increased rapidly in population have become points of attraction for people. Over the past century, the world population has begun to gather quickly in urban areas. Cities are transforming into unhealthy living environments with distorted ecological balance, lost green areas and aesthetic qualities. The value of accessible green spaces in urban areas is increasing to the unprecedented levels. The green space system seen as a necessity in the cities have provided the emergence of the "urban landscape" phenomenon. The issue of urban landscape is now a very serious concept. The landscape change is moving along with the level of civilization. Primarily, guidance service should be offered for more efficient, comfortable and protective areas. An interdisciplinary approach is needed in the creation of urban spaces. In this study, the term of urban landscape was explained and the researches about the contributions of urban landscape to urban life were examined and suggestions were made about the subject.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Acar, G. (2006). Alışveriş merkezlerinde peyzaj tasarımı. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
    • Akbari, H., Rosenfeld, A., & Taha, H. (1989). Recent developments in heat island studies: technical and policy. Controlling Summer Heat Islands, 15-30.
    • Aksoy, Y. (2001). İstanbul Kenti Yeşil Alan Durumunun İrdelenmesi, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 233.
    • Anonymous. (1999). 1999 tarih 23804 Sayılı İmar Yönetmeliği. Ankara.
    • Atay, İ. (1990). Kent Ormanları ve Çevre İle Etkileşimleri. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, B40(1), 2-5.
    • Barıs, E. M., Yazgan, E. M., & Sahin, S. (2004). Açık Alanların Ankara Kentinde Kent iklimi ve Hava Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri Üzerine Bir Arastırma. Ankara Üniversitesi Bilimsel Arastırma Projesi Kesin Raporu, s, Ankara.
    • Başal, M., & Özdemir, A. (2008). Sustainable Site Design Approaches-Sürdürebilir Peyzaj Tasarım Yaklaşımları (Vol. 1563). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
    • Beattie, J., Kollin, C., & Moll, C. (2000). Trees help cities meet clean water regulations. American Forests (summer 2000), 18.
    • Bernatzky, A. (1982). The contribution of tress and green spaces to a town climate. Energy and Buildings, 5(1), 1-10 0378- 7788.
    • Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological economics, 29(2), 293-301 0921-8009.
    • Bruch, S. P. (2006). Environmental Equity of Lansing's Urban Park Policy. (Doctorate Thesis), Michigan State University
    • 81 Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and urban planning, 68(1), 129-138 0169- 2046.
    • Çubuk, M. (2001). Kentsel Peyzaj Ders Notları. MSÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Şehircilik Anabilim Dalı Kentsel Tasarım Y.Lisans Programı. İstanbul.
    • Deloya, M. C. (1993). Urban forestry activities in Mexico. Unasylva, 173(44), 28-32.
    • Dochinger, L. S. (1980). Interception of airborne particles by tree plantings. Journal of Environmental Quality, 9(2), 265-268 0047-2425.
    • Doygun, H., & İlter, A. A. (2007). Kahramanmaraş Kentinde Mevcut ve Öngörülen Aktif Yeşil Alan Yeterliliğinin İncelenmesi. Ekoloji Dergisi, 16(65 1300-1361).
    • Dunnett, N., Swanwick, C., & Woolley, H. (2002). Improving urban parks, play areas and green spaces: Department for transport, local government and the regions London.
    • Dwyer, J. F., McPherson, E. G., Schroeder, H. W., & Rowntree, R. A. (1992). Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 18, 227-227 0278-5226.
    • Fang, C.-F., & Ling, D.-L. (2003). Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and urban planning, 63(4), 187-195 0169-2046.
    • Federer, C. A. (1976). Trees modify the urban microclimate. Journal of Arboriculture, 2(7), 121-127.
    • Gül, A., & Küçük, V. (2001). Kentsel Açık-Yesil Alanlar ve Isparta Kenti Örneginde İrdelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, A(2), 27-48
    • Hasler, B., Damgaard, C. K., Erichsen, E. H., Jørgensen, J. J., & Kristoffersen, H. E. (2002). The recreational values of forest, lake and nature restoration-valuation of nature goods using the hedonic price method. Energy and Environment. www. akf. dk/dk2002/summary/nature_restoration. htm.
    • Heisler, G. M. (1986). Energy savings with trees. Journal of Arboriculture, 12(5), 113-125.
    • Hepcan, Ş., Kaplan, A., Küçükerbaş, E. V., & Özkan, B. (2001). Kemalpaşa (İzmir) Kentsel Dış Mekanlarının Yeterliliği Üzerine Bir Araştırma. E. Ü Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(2- 3), 143-150.
    • Karaman, A. (1992). Kentsel Peyzaj Ders Notları. MSGÜ, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Bölümü. İstanbul.
    • Kızılaslan, S. (2007). Trabzon Kenti Park Ve Bahçelerinin Peyzaj Tasarım Kriterleri Açısından İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı.
    • Knapp, M., & Jordan, A. (1995). What are urban woodlands worth. Urban forest benefits analysis. Fairfax ReLeaf. Inc. Room, 828, 12011.
    • Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Aggression and violence in the inner city effects of environment via mental fatigue. Environment and behavior, 33(4), 543-571 0013-9165.
    • Levent, T. B., & Nijkamp, P. (2005). Evaluation of Urban Green Spaces. In D. Miller & D. Patassini (Eds.), Beyond benefit cost analysis: accounting for non-market values in planning evaluation (pp. 63-87): Gower Publishing, Ltd.
    • Loures, L., Santos, R., & Panagopoulos, T. (2007). Urban parks and sustainable city planning-The case of Portimão, Portugal. population, 15, 23.
    • Luttik, J. (2000). The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and urban planning, 48(3), 161-167 0169-2046.
    • Maco, S. E., & McPherson, E. G. (2003). A practical approach to assessing structure, function, and value of street tree populations in small communities.
    • Marsh, W. M. (2005). Landscape planning: Environmental applications: Wiley New York.
    • McPherson, & Gregory, E. (1994). Cooling urban heat islands with sustainable landscapes The ecological city: preserving and restoring urban biodiversity. Boston, MA: Univ of Massachusetts Press.
    • McPherson, E. G. (2004). Trees and energy conservation. Urban Forest Cut Energy Costs. www. americanforest. org.
    • Melchert, L. (2007). The Dutch sustainable building policy: A model for developing countries? Building and Environment, 42(2), 893-901 0360-1323.
    • Mutlu, Z., & Onder, S. (2012). Investigation of the Noise Reduction Provided by Bush Belts in Konya, Turkey. Journal Of International Environmental Application And Science, 7(1), 48.
    • Müderrisoğlu, H., Eroğlu, E., Özkan, Ş., & Ak, K. (2006). Visual perception of tree forms. Building and Environment, 41(6), 796-806 0360-1323.
    • Nowak, D. J. (2002). The effects of urban trees on air quality. USDA Forest Service, 96-102.
    • Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., & Stevens, J. C. (2006). Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban forestry & urban greening, 4(3), 115-123 1618- 8667.
    • Oğuz, D. (1998). Kent Parkı Kavramı Yönünden Ankara Kent Parklarının Kullanım Olgusu Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı.
    • Onder, S., Polat, A. T., & Korucu, S. (2011). The evaluation of existing and proposed active green spaces in Konya Seluklu District, Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(3), 737-747 1991-1637X.
    • Ortaçeşme, V., Karagüzel, O., Atik, M., & Sayan, M. S. (2000). Antalya Kentinin Aktif Yeşil Alan Varlığı Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Akdeniz Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 11-22.
    • Önder, S., & Polat, A. T. (2007). Yollarda Bitkisel Tasarım, Konya Kenti Örneği. Paper presented at the Kentsel Yeşil Dokunun Analizi ve Bakım Esasları Semineri, Konya.
    • Önder, S., & Polat, A. T. (2012). Kentsel Açık-Yeşil Alanların Kent Yaşamındaki Yeri ve Önemi. Paper presented at the Kentsel Peyzaj Alanlarının Oluşumu ve Bakım Esasları Semineri, Konya.
    • Özbilen, A. (1991). Kentiçi Açık Alanlar ve Dağılımı, Tarihi Eserler ve Gelişen Yeni Yapılaşma. Orman Fakültesi, Genel Yayın(155).
    • Özcan, K. (2006). Sürdürülebilir Kentsel Gelişmede Açık-Yeşil Alanların Rolü, Kırıkkale, Türkiye Örneği. Ekoloji, 15(60), 37-45.
    • Öztürk, B. (2004). Kentsel Açık ve Yeşil Alan Sistemi Oluşturulması: Kayseri Kent Bütünü Örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü-Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü. Ankara, 88.
    • Pamay, B. (1978). Kentsel peyzaj planlaması. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayınları, İÜ Yayın(2487).
    • Peters, K., Elands, B., & Buijs, A. (2010). Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban forestry & urban greening, 9(2), 93-100 1618-8667.
    • Polat, A. T. (2010). Kentsel Çevrenin Görsel Kalitesi ve Bitkiler. Plant, Peyzaj ve Süs Bitkileri Dergisi, 1(3), 20-23.
    • Polat, A. T., & Önder, S. (2012). Kentsel Peyzaj: Tasarım ve Uygulamaya Yönelik Bazı Öneriler. Paper presented at the Kentsel Peyzaj Alanlarının Oluşumu ve Bakım Esasları Semineri, Konya.
    • Richter, G. (1981). Formen und Funktionen des Stadtgrüns. In G. Richter (Ed.), Handbuch StadtgrünLandschaftsarchitektur im städtischen Freiraum. BLV München: München, Wien, Zürich. BLV.
    • Sanesi, G., Lafortezza, R., Bonnes, M., & Carrus, G. (2006). Comparison of two different approaches for assessing the psychological and social dimensions of green spaces. Urban forestry & urban greening, 5(3), 121-129 1618- 8667.
    • Scott, K. I., McPherson, E. G., & Simpson, J. R. (1998). Air pollutant uptake by Sacramento's urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture, 24, 224-234 0278-5226.
    • Sherer, P. M. (2006). The Benefits of Parks. San Francisco, CA: The Trust for Public Land.
    • Simpson, J. R., & McPherson, E. G. (1998). Simulation of tree shade impacts on residential energy use for space conditioning in Sacramento. Atmospheric Environment, 32(1), 69-74 1352-2310.
    • Sommer, R., Learey, F., Summit, J., & Tirrell, M. (1994). Social benefits of resident involvement in tree planting: Comparison with developer-planted trees. Journal of Arboriculture, 20, 323-323 0278-5226.
    • Tajima, K. (2003). New estimates of the demand for urban green space: implications for valuing the environmental benefits of Boston's big dig project. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(5), 641-655 1467-9906.
    • Taplin, D. H. (2002). Art, Nature, And People: Landscape Valves of An Urban Park. (Doctorate), The City University of New York New York
    • Taylor, D., Bozeat, N., Parkinson, M., & Belil, M. (2000). The urban audit: towards the benchmarking of quality of life in 58 European cities (Volume 3: The urban audit manual). Luxembourg, European Commission (http://www. inforegio. cec. eu. int/urban/audit/ftp/volume3. pdf).
    • Tilt, J. H. (2010). Walking trips to parks: exploring demographic, environmental factors, and preferences for adults with children in the household. Preventive medicine, 50, S69- S73 0091-7435.
    • Trzesicka-Mlynarz, D. (2005). Integrating Industrial Legacy Into Contemporary Urban Park Design: An Exploratory Study: University of Guelph.
    • Uslu, A. (2007). Kent Ekolojisi. In S. Gökmen (Ed.), Genel Ekoloji (Vol. 1160, pp. 353-401). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
    • Uzun, S. (2005). Kırsal Ve Kentsel Alanlardaki Parklarda Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti: Gölcük Orman İçi Dinlenme Alanı Ve İnönü Parkı Örneği. Yüksek Lisans Tezi Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı.
    • Walker, C. (2004). The public value of urban parks: Citeseer.
    • Wong, K. K. (2009). Urban park visiting habits and leisure activities of residents in Hong Kong, China. Managing Leisure, 14(2), 125-140 1360-6719.
    • Yenice, M. S. (2012). Kentsel Yeşil Alanlar İçin Mekânsal Yeterlilik ve Erişilebilirlik Analizi; Burdur Örneği, Türkiye. SDÜ Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 41-47.
    • Yıldız, N. D., & Yılmaz, H. (2003). Kars Kenti Açık ve Yeşil Alanlarının Sayısal Analizi/The Numerical Analysis of Kars City Open and Green Areas. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 34(3 1300-9036).
    • Yıldızcı, A. C. (1988). Bitkisel Tasarım. Atlas Ofset, İstanbul.
    • Yılmaz, S., Bulut, Z., & Yeşil, P. (2006). Kent Ormanlarının Kentsel Mekana Sağladığı Faydalar, Atatürk Üniversitesi. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(1), 131-136.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.