Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Goodbun, Jon (2016)
Publisher: Ubiquity Press
Journal: ARENA Journal of Architectural Research (AJAR)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: mud; concrete; modernism; Gaudi; Soleri; CADCAM; Cheval; Rodia; Wright, architecture
What is concrete? Loved and loathed in equal measure, this building material, as soon as we try to define it, to specify it, to describe it, becomes, well, not very concrete at all, but rather fluid and surprisingly abstract! Concrete is a material which has been going through an interesting intellectual and practical renaissance in recent years, in no small part driven by the convergence of several different kinds of technology-driven manufacturing changes - ranging from computer aided manufacturing of formworks, to photograph etching, to engineering software, to nano- and bio-chemistry to 3D printing - which have opened up new worlds of realizable, expressive and performance optimised form. The demands posed by anthropogenic climate change, energy use, resource scarcity, and the environmental question more generally, have equally transformed the technologies and industries that are now feeding into developments in this material. On its own though, that is not enough to understand the revival in interest. In this paper I will argue that there are indeed profound relationships between capital, modernity and concrete. However, I will suggest that in order to really start to grasp these relations, we will need to explore some ways of thinking about concrete that have not been developed so far within the recent literature on the material. Notably I will develop an ecological approach to thinking about what concrete is, and in so doing redefine this material as a particular form of mud, or mudcrete: a material which is deployed by both human and non-human builders. I will note the ecological energetics and extended materialities of mudcrete, and will reflect upon the conceptual 'forms' or ‘patterns’ of this matter as a particular modality of the production of nature. Mudcretes always internalise in particularly interesting ways I argue, their external relations, the extended networks of materials, skills, labours and energies that go into their production. Mudcretes frequently stage fascinating bio-semiotic performances, whichever species or processes are dominant. But when the mudcretes in question are the product of human labour, they always act as social media.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Forty, A. Concrete and Culture: A Material History. London: Reaktion; 2012.
    • 2. Cohen, JL. Modern Architecture and the saga of concrete. In Cohen JL, Moeller M (eds). Liquid Stone: New Architecture in Concrete. Basel-Berlin-Boston: Birkhauser; 2006, p. 20-33.
    • 3. Wigley, M. Foreword. In Bell M, Buckley C (eds.). Solid State: Concrete in Transition. New York: Princeton Architectural Press; 2010, p. 6-7.
    • 4. Kwinter, S. Concrete: Dead or Alive? In Bell M, Buckley C (eds.). Solid State: Concrete in Transition. New York: Princeton Architectural Press; 2010, p. 39-46.
    • 5. Picon, A. Architecture and Technology: Two centuries of creative tension. In Cohen JL, Moeller M (eds). Liquid Stone: New Architecture in Concrete. Basel-Berlin-Boston: Birkhauser; 2006, p. 8-19.
    • 6. Lloyd-Thomas, K. Jigging with Concrete. In Chandler A, Pedreschi R (eds.). Fabric Formwork. London: RIBA Publishing; 2007.
    • 7. Hatherley, O. Militant Modernism. London: Zero; 2009.
    • 8. Marx, K. Capital. Volume 1. London: Penguin; 1976.
    • 9. Loos, A. Architecture (first published in Der Sturm). 1910. Retrieved from http://thecharnelhouse. org/2014/03/17/someone-is-buried-here-adolf-loos-on-architecture-and-death/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 10. Forty, A. The Material without a History. In Cohen JL, Moeller M (eds). Liquid Stone: New Architecture in Concrete. Basel-Berlin-Boston: Birkhauser; 2006. pp. 34-45.
    • 11. Bateson, G. Metalogue: Why do things have outlines? In Bateson G, Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago; Chicago University Press; 2000.
    • 12. Guattari, F. The Three Ecologies. London: Athlone Press, 2000.
    • 13. Koolhaas, R. Delirious New York: A retroactive manifesto for Manhattan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.
    • 14. Burry, M. Paramorph: anti-accident methodologies. Architectural Design (AD Profile 140) . 1999; 69(9/10): 78-83.
    • 15. Thomas, M. Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete. Portland Cement Association. 2007. Retrieved from http://www.cement.org/docs/default-source/fc_concrete_technology/is548-optimizing-the-useof-fly-ash-concrete.pdf (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 16. Martino, J. Hempcrete could change the way we build everything. Collective Evolution. 2013. http:// www.collective-evolution.com/2013/02/03/hempcrete-worlds-strongest-building-material/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 17. Froelich, A. Nigerians Are Building Fireproof, Bulletproof, and Eco-Friendly Homes With Plastic Bottles and  Mud. Films For Action. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.filmsforaction.org/articles/fireproofbulletproof-ecofriendly-homes/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 18. Rauch, M and Heringer, A. Mudworks. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=TzQh82mwwUQ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 19. Chandler, A and Pedreschi, R (eds.). Fabric Formwork. London: RIBA Publishing; 2007.
    • 20. West, M. C.A.S.T. 2012. Retrieved from http://fabricform.wordpress.com/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 21. Moretti, M. WASP's Big Delta Returns. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.wasproject.it/w/en/waspsbigdelta-returns/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 22. Rudenko, A. 3D Printed Concrete Castle is Complete. 2016. Retrieved from http://www.totalkustom. com/3d-castle-completed.html (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 23. Dini, E. D-Shape System. 2016. Retrieved from http://d-shape.com/what-is-it/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 24. Frearson, A. Yingchuang New Materials Factory. Dezeen. 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dezeen. com/2014/04/24/chinese-company-3d-prints-buildings-construction-waste/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 25. Frearson, A. Foster + Partners reveals concept for 3D-printed Mars habitat built by robots. Dezeen. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.dezeen.com/2015/09/25/foster-partners-concept-3d-printed-mars-habitatrobots-regolith/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 26. Armstrong, R. Architecture that repairs itself? TED Global. 2009. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/ talks/rachel_armstrong_architecture_that_repairs_itself?language=en (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 27. Jonker, H. TU Delft self-healing bio-concrete nominated for European Inventor Award. TU Delft. 2015. Retrieved from http://www.tudelft.nl/en/current/latest-news/article/detail/zelfherstellend-biobetontu-delft-genomineerd-voor-european-inventor-award/ (accessed 12 April 2016).
    • 28. Scheerbart, P and Taut, B (Sharp, D ed.). Glass Architecture. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger; 1972.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article