LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Klijn, Erik-Hans; Edelenbos, Jurian (2011)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
textabstractAbstract The literature on (governance) networks and network management in general focuses on the performance of these networks or the way networks are constructed or decision-making or collaborative processes in these networks unfold. Some authors assert that most of the new forms of governance networks have a distinct managerial bias (see, for instance, Pollitt’s 2003 discussion of joint up government or Sullivan & Skelcher, 2002). This certainly is evident in the US literature, which, with some exception (see for instance: O Toole, 1997), pays little attention to the democratic character of networks, or to the possible tensions between governance networks and the traditional institutions of representative democracy. As compared to the American literature, a greater level of attention is paid in the European literature to the tensions that exist between governance networks, institutions of representative democracy and the overarching need to involve stakeholders in decision making. There is however very little empirical work on the democratic nature of these networks although theoretical work on this is growing (Sorensen and Torfing, 2007). This paper elaborates on the notion of democratic legitimacy and develops a framework for analyzing this phenomenon in governance networks. The paper distinguishes three dimensions of democratic legitimacy drawing upon different theories of democracy. These are accountability (tied to more representational theories of democracies), voice (tied to more participative theories of democracies) and due deliberation (tied to more deliberate theories of democracies). The paper operationalizes each form of democratic legitimacy and then looks how these various forms of democratic legitimacy influence the outcomes in governance networks. We test this with a survey done in the first half of 2010 among respondents in environmental projects/water management projects (n=220). Regression analyses with various forms of outcomes (process or content outcomes) and the forms of democratic legitimacy as independent variables show that democratic legitimacy in general has a significant positive effect on outcomes in governance networks and that more deliberate dimensions of democratic legitimacy have much stronger impact than for instance representational dimensions of democratic legitimacy. The paper also shows a fairly strong correlation between network management strategies and democratic legitimacy. The paper ends with a reflection on the findings for theories of governance networks and network management.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Agranoff, R., M. McGuire, (2001), Big questions in public network management research, Journal of Public administration research and Theory, vol 11 (2001), no. 3: 295-326
    • Agranoff, R. and M. McGuire (2003) Collaborative Public Management; new strategies for local governments, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    • Arnstein, S.R. (1971) Eight rungs on the ladder of citizen participation, in: Edgar S.C. en B.A. Passett (red.), Citizen Participation: Effecting Community Change, Praeger Publishers, New York, 69-91.
    • Berry, J.M., K.E. Portney & K. Thomson (1993) The Rebirth of Urban Democracy, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
    • Dahl, R.A. (1961) Who governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven: Yale University Press.
    • Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper: New York.
    • Drysek, J.S. (2000), Deliberate democracy and beyond; liberals, critics, contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Edelenbos, J., B. Steijn, E.H. Klijn (2010), Does democratic anchorage matter? In American Review of Public Administration volume 40 (no1): 46-63
    • Hanf, K, and F.W. Scharpf (eds.) (1978), Interorganisational Policy Making, London: sage
    • Held, D. (2006), Models of democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press
    • Hirst, P., (1997), From statism to pluralism; democracy, civil society and global politics, London: UCL Press
    • Hirst (2000), democracy and governance in Pierre (ed.) 2000: 13-35
    • Huang, K., K.G. Provan (2007), Structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed mental health service network, Public Management Rieview, vol 9 nr.2: 169-189
    • Klijn, E.H. (2008), Governance and Governance Networks in Europe: An Assessment of 10 years of research on the theme, Public Management Review, vol, 10, issue 4: 505-525
    • Klijn, E.H., J. Edelenbos, B. Steijn (2010b), Trust in governance networks; its impact and outcomes, Administration and Society, vol 42 (2): 193-221
    • E.H. Klijn, C.K. Skelcher (2007), Democracy and governance networks: compatible or not? Four conjectures and their implications, Public Administration, vol 85, no 3,2007: 1-22
    • Koppenjan, J.F.M., E.H. Klijn, (2004), Managing uncertainties in networks; a network perspective on problem solving and decision making, London: Routledge
    • MacPherson, C.B. 1977. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Mandell, M. (ed.) (2001), Getting results trough collaboration; networks and network structures for public policy and management, Westport: Quorum Books
    • Marcussen, M. & J. Torfing (red.) (2007). Democratic network governance in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
    • Marsh, D. (ed.), (1998), Comparing policy networks, Buckingham: Open University Press
    • Meier, K. L.J. O‟Toole (2007), Modelling Public Management: empirical analysis of the management-performance nexus Public Administration Review, 9(4), 503-527.
    • Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenhal:Edgar Elgar
    • O'Toole, L.J. (1988) Strategies for Intergovernmental Management: Implementing Programs in Interorganizational Networks, in: Journal of Public Administration, 11 (4): 417-441.
    • O'Toole, L.J. (1997), Treating networks seriously: practical and research based agendas in public administration, Public Administration Review, 57: 1 (pp. 43-57)
    • Pateman, C., (1970), Participation and democratic theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Pierre, J. (ed.) (2000). Debating Governance; authority steering and democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997), Understanding Government, Open University Press, Buckingham.
    • Schumpeter, G.A. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.
    • Skelcher, C. (2005), Public-Private partnerships and hybridity in: E. Ferlie, L. Lynn, C. Pollitt (eds.), The Handbook of public management, Oxford: Oxford University Press: pp347-370
    • Skelcher, C., N. Mathur and M. Smith. 2005. „The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy.‟ Public Administration 83, 3, 573-96.
    • Skelcher, S.K., H. Sullivan (2007), Public partnhership, citizen participation and democratic governance, Paper for the „Public Partnerships and Collaborative Governance - the citizenship challenge‟ seminar, Manchester University. 18th May, 2007
    • Sorenson, E., J. Torfing (eds.), (2007), Theories of democratic network governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
    • Sullivan, H. and C. Skelcher. 2002. Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
    • Truman, D. (1964) The Governmental Process, New York: Knopf.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Collected from

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok